Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Dialogic Matters: Interrelating Dialogue, the Material, and Social Change
Edited by Theresa Castor
[Language and Dialogue 11:1] 2021
► pp. 1–7
Introduction

Dialogic matters

Interrelating dialogue, the material, and social change

| University of Wisconsin – Parkside , USA


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 22 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00081.int
References
Arnett, Ronald C.
2017 “Language as the originative house of dialogic ethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue ed. by Edda Weigand, 307–317. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin
1923; 1996 I and Thou. New York, Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
Caronia, Letizia, and Arturo Chieregato
2016 “Polyphony in a ward: Tracking professional theories in members’ dialogues.” Language and Dialogue 6 (3): 395–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia and Vittoria Colla
2021 “Objects that matter: the hybrid and distributed agency in parent-assisted homework interactions.” Language and Dialogue 11 (1): 8–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2015 “In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality.” Communication Research and Practice 1 (4): 307–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 278–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur C.
1973 Analytical Philosophy of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1963 “Actions, reasons and causes.” Journal of Philosophy 601: 685–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dollar, Natalie J.
2021 “Engaging contested community issues: Community dialogue in one USAmerican community.” Language and Dialogue 11 (1): 125–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmond, Charlotte
2020 January 15. “These are the top risks facing the world in 2020.” World Economic Forum. [URL]
Gee, James P.
2017 “Discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 62–77. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno
2004 “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.” Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Létourneau, Alain
2014 “An example of the plurality of levels of communication ethics analysis in a newspaper article.” In Philosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other, ed. by Ronald C. Arnett and Pat Arneson, 233–252. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University.Google Scholar
2017 “The Bakhtin case: An apparent tension between two traditions in dialogue studies.” Language and Dialogue 7 (2): 236–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 109–126. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
1965 Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2017 “Conversation analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 26–45. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noy, Chaim
2015 Thank you for dying for our country: Commemorative texts and performances in Jerusalem. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha
2011 Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Boston, Belknap at Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parks, Elizabeth S. and Jessica S. Robles
2021 “Perpetuating ableist constructions of the ‘real world’ through complaints about new communication technologies”. Language and Dialogue 11 (1): 35–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya
2004 “Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation.” Feminist Economics 10 (3): 77–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharonova, Svetlana and Elena Avdeeva
2021 “Dialogue between smart education and classical education.” Language and Dialogue 11 (1): 151-171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N.
1973 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by Ladislav Metejka and I.R. Titunik. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N.
1989 “Dialogue theory for critical thinking.” Argumentation 31: 169–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2009 Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar