Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp.246270
Ainsworth, Scott and Marcus Flathman
1995 “Unanimous Consent Agreements as Leadership Tools.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(2): 177–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arminen, Ilkka
2017Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Farnham, UK: Ashgate. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody C., Jonathan S. Morris, and Jeffrey Michael Coleman
2018 “Did the ‘Road to the White House Run Through’ Letterman? Chris Christie, Letterman, and Other- Disparaging Versus Self-Deprecating Humor.” Journal of Political Marketing 17(3): 282–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B.
2012 “Comedy Types and Political Campaigns: The Differential Influence of Other-Directed Hostile Humor and Self-Ridicule on Candidate Evaluations.” Mass Communication and Society, 15(6): 791–812. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Anthony J. Madonna, and Mark E. Owens
2016 “Regulating the Floor: Tabling Motions in the U.S. Senate, 1865–1946.” American Politics Research 44(1): 56–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Ariel Shuk-ling and Foong Ha Yap
2015 “ ‘Please Continue to be an Anime Lover’: The Use of Defamation Metaphors in Hong Kong Electoral Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 871(2015): 31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaturvedi, Neilan S.
2018 “Filling the Amendment Tree: Majority Party Control, Procedures, and Polarization in the U.S. Senate.” American Politics Research 46(4): 724–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chefneux, Gabriela
2015 “Humor at Work.” Language & Dialogue 5(3): 381–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clymer, Adam
1999Edward M. Kennedy: A Biography. New York: William & Morrow.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, Anatolii Vasil’evich
2008 “Humor and Politics.” Russian Social Science Review 49(1): 53–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Ofer and Peter Bull
2012 “Understanding Audience Affiliation in Response to Political Speeches in Japan.” Language & Dialogue 2(3): 375–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard and William Housley
2015Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Angela Cora
2013An Introduction to Interaction: Understanding Talk in Formal and Informal Settings. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip
2003Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halkowski, Timothy
1990 “Role as an Interactional Device.” Social Problems 371: 564–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, Andrea C.
2011 “The Electoral Risks of Senate Majority Leadership, or How Tom Daschle Lost and Harry Reid Won.” The Forum 9(4): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Jessica M., Matthew J. Geras, Nathan M. Gerth, and Michael H. Crespin
2017 “Land, Wood, Water, and Space: Senator Robert S. Kerr, Congress, and Selling the Space Race to the American Public.” Social Science Quarterly 98(4): 1189–1203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny
2010 “Trait Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Politics Research 38(6): 1102–1129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Steven E. Clayman
2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Boston, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Steven and Peter Eglin
1997Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: IIECA & University Press of America.Google Scholar
Innocenti, Beth, and Elizabeth Miller
2016 “The Persuasive Force of Political Humor.” Journal of Communication 661(2016): 366–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inya, Onwu
2021 “ ‘The Legislature is the Engine Room of Democracy’: Constructing Ideological Worldviews through Proximisation Strategies in Nigerian Senate Debates.” Discourse & Society 32(2): 196–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1979 “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and its Subsequent Acceptance Declination. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79–96. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 43–59. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kadkhodaee, Elham and Zeinab Ghasemi Tari
2019 “Otherising Iran in American Political Discourse: Case Study of a Post-JCPOA Senate Hearing on Iran Sanctions.” Third World Quarterly 40(1): 109–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayam, Orly
Mann, Rafi
2016 “The Bibi Sitter and the Hipster: The New Comical Political Discourse.” Israel Affairs 22(3/4): 788–801. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Joseph S.
2009 “Humour and Insult in the House of Commons: The Case of Palmerston and Disraeli.” Parliamentary History 281, pt. 21 (2009): 228–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2016 “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin and Lauren C. Bell
2004 “Rational Behavior or the Norm of Cooperation?: Filibustering Among Retiring Senators.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 906–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred-Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Marissa Caldwell, Lisa Mikesell, Innhwa Park, and Nicholas Williams
2019 “Turn-taking and the Structural Legitimization of Bias: The Case of the Ford-Kavanaugh Hearing by the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary.” Language & Communication 691(2019): 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossing, Jonathan P.
2017 “No Joke: Silent Jesters and Comedic Refusals.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 20(3): 545–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1972 “On the Analysability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 325–345. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1984 “On Doing Being Ordinary.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 314–429. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 11, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Gene H. Lerner
2009 “Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced responses to Wh-Questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(2): 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Jeannine
2010Linguistic Aspects of Verbal Humor in Stand-up Comedy. PhD dissertation in English. Saarland: Department of English, University of Saarland. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2010Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Soulaimani, Dris
2018 “Talk, Voice and Gestures in Reported Speech: Toward an Integrated Approach.” Discourse Studies 20(3): 361–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Timothy
2010Kennedy vs. Carter: The 1980 Battle for the Democratic Party’s Soul. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Stewart, Patrick A.
2010 “Presidential Laugh Lines: Candidate Display Behavior and Audience Laughter in the 2008 Primary Debates.” Politics and the Life Sciences 29(2): 55–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ten Have, Paul
2007Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide, Second Edition. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, Maykel and Wybren Nooitgedagt
2019 “Parliamentary Identity and the Management of the Far-Right: A Discursive Analysis of Dutch Parliamentary Debates.” British Journal of Social Psychology 581(2019): 495–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waisanen, Don
2015 “Comedian-in-Chief: Presidential Jokes as Enthymematic Crisis Rhetoric.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45(2): 335–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Jon
2019Camelot’s End: Kennedy vs. Carter, and the Fight that Broke the Democratic Party. New York City, New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
Winiecki, Donald
2008 “The Expert Witnesses and Courtroom Discourse.” Discourse & Society 19(6): 765–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar