Discussion article
A mural that helped to bring down Jeremy Corbyn
How hegemonic discourse silences dialogue
In the 2017 elections, the Labour party under Jeremy Corbyn did much better than expected, in spite of being
denounced by the established British media for its radical anti-capitalist agenda. To turn the tables, the media then shifted
their attack from this political programme to Corbyn’s alleged blindness towards antisemitic manifestations. The resulting loss of
sympathy with voters cost Labour dearly in the 2019 elections and brought his leadership to an end. As key evidence for his moral
failure to tackle the antisemitism issue, the media cited, in a barrage of pieces, his 2012 comments on a short lived London
mural. Was it anti-capitalist or antisemitic? In the absence of any serious dialogue between contrary views, the judgment passed
reasserted the underlying media agenda.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Democratic discourse is dialogic, hegemonic discourse speaks in one voice only
- 3.The mural and what it means
- 4.Artistic images between anti-capitalism and antisemitism
- 5.The Guardian and the mural
- 6.Without a plurivocal dialogue no progress
- Notes
-
References