Discussion articles
Instrumental dialogue and the ethics of expressing solicitude for each other’s existence
Dialogue is about forgoing control and possession when interacting with the Other. In comparison, the notion of
instrumentality appears contrary to the very notion of dialogue. This paper suggests, however, that mutual instrumentalization is
necessary for dialogue to be a space where participants express solicitude for each other and promote each other’s voice, action,
and existence. Building on the work of French philosopher Étienne Souriau, we argue that promoting another’s existence
requires taking their actions and speech into our own. This enables them to also exist through us as we allow them to instrumentalize us. Such a view better accounts for what goes on in tangible dialogue situations, as we show by revisiting an empirical
case. Our proposal extends current research on the conditions of productive dialogue, invites being careful about who or what
populates the dialogical scene, and turns our attention to what they may need to pursue their existence.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Dialogical ethics as the absence of control and instrumentalization
- 3.Ethics in dialogue: In defense of instrumentalization and cultivation
- 4.Étienne Souriau and the different modes of existence
- 5.The everyday ethics of solving a problem in a work context
- 6.Instrumental dialogue’s ethics of care
-
References
References (82)
References
Arnett, Ronald C. 2001. “Dialogic Civility as Pragmatic Ethical Praxis: An Interpersonal Metaphor for the Public Domain.” Communication Theory 11 (3): 315–338.
Arnett, Ronald C. 2015. ‘The Dialogic Necessity: Acknowledging and Engaging Monologue.” Ohio Communication Journal 531 (October): 1–10.
Arnett, Ronald C. 2016a. “An Immemorial Obligation: Countering the Eclipse of the Other.” Journal of Communication and Religion 39 (2): 7–21.
Arnett, Ronald C. 2016b. “Dialogue Theory.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, ed. by Klaus Bruhn Jensen, Eric W. Rothenbuhler, Jefferson D. Pooley, and Robert T. Craig, 1–13. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Arnett, Ronald C. and Pat Arneson (eds). 2016. Philosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ashcraft, Karen Lee, Timothy Kuhn, and François Cooren. 2009. “Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication.” The Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 1–64.
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barnes, Marian. 2020. “Community Care: The Ethics of Care in a Residential Community.” Ethics and Social Welfare 14 (2): 140–155.
Bencherki, Nicolas, Boris H. J. M. Brummans, and Camille Vézy. 2020. “Agency without Agents: Individuation, Communication, and the Reordering of Organizational Becomings.” Paper presented at the 70th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Gold Coast, Australia.
Bencherki, Nicolas, François Cooren, Boris H. J. M. Brummans, Chantal Benoit-Barné, and Frédérik Matte. 2020. “La culture en tant que cultivation : vers une conception communicationnelle de la culture organisationnelle.” Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique, no. 29 (June): 89–109.
Bencherki, Nicolas, and Kasper Trolle Elmholdt. 2022. “The Organization’s Synaptic Mode of Existence: How a Hospital Merger Is Many Things at Once.” Organization 29 (4): 521–543.
Bencherki, Nicolas, and Andrew Iliadis. 2021. “The Constitution of Organization as Informational Individuation.” Communication Theory 31 (3): 442–462.
Bencherki, Nicolas, Frédérik Matte, and Émilie Pelletier. 2016. “Rebuilding Babel: A Constitutive Approach to Tongues-in-Use.” Journal of Communication 66 (5): 766–788.
Bencherki, Nicolas, Viviane Sergi, François Cooren, and Consuelo Vásquez. 2021. “How Strategy Comes to Matter: Strategizing as the Communicative Materialization of Matters of Concern.” Strategic Organization 19 (4): 608–35.
Bencherki, Nicolas, and James P. Snack. 2016. “Contributorship and Partial Inclusion: A Communicative Perspective.” Management Communication Quarterly 30 (3): 279–304.
Benoit-Barné, Chantal, and François Cooren. 2009. “The Accomplishment of Authority through Presentification: How Authority Is Distributed among and Negotiated by Organizational Members.” Management Communication Quarterly 23 (1): 5–31.
Bos, René ten. 2002. “Machiavelli’s Kitchen.” Organization 9 (1): 51–70.
Brummans, Boris H. J. M. (ed.). 2018. The Agency of Organizing: Perspectives and Case Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Buber, Martin. 1958. I and Thou. New York: Scribner.
Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Callon, Michel and John Law. 1995. “Agency and the Hybrid Collectif.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 94 (2): 481–507.
Castor, Theresa and François Cooren. 2006. “Organizations as Hybrid Forms of Life: The Implications of the Selection of Agency in Problem Formulation.” Management Communication Quarterly 19 (4): 570–600.
Choukah, Sarah and Philippe Theophanidis. 2016. “Emergence and Ontogenetics: Towards a Communication without Agent.” Social Science Information 55 (3): 286–299.
Christensen, Lars Thøger, Mette Morsing, and Ole Thyssen. 2011. “The Polyphony of Coporate Social Responsibility: Deconstructing Accountability and Transparency in the Context of Identity and Hypocrisy.” In Handbook of Communication Ethics, ed. by George Cheney, S. May, and Debashish Munish, 457–474. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cissna, Kenneth N., and Rob Anderson. 1998. “Theorizing about Dialogic Moments: The Buber-Rogers Position and Postmodern Themes.” Communication Theory 8 (1): 63–104.
Cooren, François. 2004. “The Communicative Achievement of Collective Minding: Analysis of Board Meeting Excerpts.” Management Communication Quarterly 17 (4): 517–551.
Cooren, François. 2015. “In the Name of Law: Ventriloquism and Juridical Matters.” In Latour and the Passage of Law, ed. by Kyle McGee, 235–272. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Cooren, François. 2016. “Ethics for Dummies: Ventriloquism and Responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 24 (1): 17–30.
Cooren, François. 2018. “Materializing Communication: Making the Case for a Relational Ontology.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 278–288.
Cooren, François, Stephanie Fox, Daniel Robichaud, and Nayla Talih. 2005. “Arguments for a Plurified View of the Social World: Spacing and Timing as Hybrid Achievements.” Time & Society 14 (2–3): 265–282.
Cooren, François, and Sergeiy Sandler. 2014. “Polyphony, Ventriloquism, and Constitution: In Dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory 24 (3): 225–244.
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Monolingualism of the Other, or, The Prosthesis of Origin. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [URL]
Derrida, Jacques. 2000. Of Hospitality. Ed. by Anne Dufourmantelle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Follett, Mary Parker. 1926. “The Psychological Foundations: The Giving of Orders.” In Scientific Foundations of Business Administration, ed. by Henry C. Metcalf, 132–149. Human Relations. Baltimore, MD: The Williams & Wilkins Company.
Foucault, Michel. 1979. “What Is an Author?” In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. by Josué V. Harari, 225–230. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
García-Marzá, Domingo. 2005. “Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing.” Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3): 209–219.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Golob, Ursa, and Klement Podnar. 2014. “Critical Points of CSR-Related Stakeholder Dialogue in Practice.” Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (3): 248–257.
Gurevitch, Zali. 2000. “Plurality in Dialogue: A Comment on Bakhtin”. Sociology 34 (2): 243–263.
Hennion, Antoine. 2017. “From Valuation to Instauration: On the Double Pluralism of Values.” Valuation Studies 5 (1): 69–81.
Illia, Laura, Stefania Romenti, Belén Rodríguez-Cánovas, Grazia Murtarelli, and Craig Carroll. 2017. “Exploring Corporations’ Dialogue About CSR in the Digital Era.” Journal of Business Ethics 146 (1): 39–58.
Johannesen, Richard L. 1971. “The Emerging Concept of Communication as Dialogue.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 57 (4): 373–382.
Kant, Immanuel. (1785) 2002. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. by Thomas E. Hill and Arnulf Zweig. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1989. “On the Ethics of Constructing Communication.” In Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Issues, ed. by B. Dervin, Lawrence Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, and E. Wartella, 66–96. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [URL]
Latour, Bruno. 2011. “La Société Comme Possession – La « preuve Par l’orchestre »’. In Philosophie des Possessions, ed. by Didier Debaise, 9–34. Dijon: Presses du réel.
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Time and the Other. Translated by Richard A. Cohen. Revised edition. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Levy, Neil. 2014. “Forced to Be Free? Increasing Patient Autonomy by Constraining It.” Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5): 293–300.
Lozano, Josep M., and Alfons Sauquet. 1999. “Integrating Business and Ethical Values Through Practitioner Dialogue.” Journal of Business Ethics 22 (3): 203–217.
MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Maclagan, Patrick. 1999. “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Participative Process’. Business Ethics: A European Review 8 (1): 43–49.
Matte, Frédérik, and Nicolas Bencherki. 2019. “Materializing Ethical Matters of Concern: Practicing Ethics in a Refugee Camp.” International Journal of Communication 131: 5870–5889.
Matte, Frédérik, and François Cooren. 2015. “Learning as Dialogue: An “on-the-Go” Approach to Dealing with Organizational Tensions.” In Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work: Conceptions, Traditions and Practices, ed. by Laurent Filliettaz and Stephen Billett, 169–187. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
McNamee, Sheila, and John Shotter. 2004. “Dialogue, Creativity, and Change.” In Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, by Rob Anderson, Leslie Baxter, and Kenneth Cissna, 91–104. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Meunier, Dominique, and Consuelo Vásquez. 2008. “On Shadowing the Hybrid Character of Actions: A Communicational Approach.” Communication Methods and Measures 2 (3): 167–192.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. “The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies 20 (6): 743–769.
Morrell, Kevin, and Michael Anderson. 2006. “Dialogue and Scrutiny in Organizational Ethics.” Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (2): 117–129.
Morsing, Mette, and Majken Schultz. 2006. “Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies.” Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4): 323–338.
Oosterhout, J. (Hans) van, Ben Wempe, and Theo van Willigenburg. 2004. “Rethinking Organizational Ethics: A Plea for Pluralism.” Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4): 385–393.
Poulos, Christopher N. 2008. “Accidental Dialogue.” Communication Theory 18 (1): 117–138.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ricœur, Paul. 1991. From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II1. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
Sanders, Robert E. 2012. “Strategy and Creativity in Dialogue.” In Spaces of Polyphony, ed. by Clara-Ubaldina Lorda and Patrick Zabalbeascoa, 11–24. Amsterdam; New York, NY: John Benjamins.
Souriau, Étienne. (1956) 2015. “Of the Mode of Existence of the Work To-Be-Made.” In The Different Modes of Existence, translated by Erik Beranek and Tim Howles, 219–240. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishers.
Souriau, Étienne. (1943) 2015. The Different Modes of Existence. Translated by Erik Beranek and Tim Howles. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishers.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Stam, Henderikus J. 2010. “Self and Dialogue: Introduction.” Theory & Psychology 20 (3): 299–304.
Stewart, John, and Karen Zediker. 2000. “Dialogue as Tensional, Ethical Practice.” Southern Communication Journal 65 (2–3): 224–242.
Stückelberger, Christoph. 2009. “Dialogue Ethics: Ethical Criteria and Conditions for a Successful Dialogue Between Companies and Societal Actors.” Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3): 329.
Suchman, Lucy. 1987. Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1992. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Vásquez, Consuelo, and Timothy R. Kuhn, eds. 2019. Dis/Organization as Communication: Exploring the Disordering, Disruptive and Chaotic Properties of Communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Parsloe, Sarah M., Jose D. Leon, Logan Allen & Seth Juncewski
2024.
The Power of Puppetry as an Arts-Based Tool for Health and Disability Communication Research.
Health Communication ► pp. 1 ff.
Létourneau, Alain, Geneviève Boivin & Nicolas Bencherki
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.