Cover not available
Article published In:
Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice
Edited by Alain Létourneau, Geneviève Boivin and Nicolas Bencherki
[Language and Dialogue 13:2] 2023
► pp. 229–253

Debaters’ actions to manage interaction in the context of the debate talk show

 | University of Massachusetts Amherst
The project explores how conflict is managed in a debate talk show that addresses the current situation in Belarus and its future. The analysis shows that the debaters act as co-designers of the debate activity. They indicate a variety of moves that they find inappropriate (e.g., personal attacks) and use various interactional resources to challenge these actions, which is done directly (e.g., directly naming inappropriate actions) and indirectly (e.g., nonverbal actions). Their interventions are aimed at managing interaction, but at the same time, they undermine their opponents’ image. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of identities as an interactional resource to shape interaction. The analysis also demonstrates the role of a multi-party structure of the debate in managing interaction.
Keywords: conflict, debate, discourse analysis, multi-party interaction, talk show
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Difficult conversations
  • 3.Communication design perspective on managing interaction
  • 4.Methodology and data
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Moves challenged by the debaters
    • 5.2The debaters’ interventions
    • 5.3Identity matters
    • 5.4Collaborative work to manage interaction
  • 6.Discussion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 1 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00148.vas
References (46)
References
Aakhus, Mark. 2003. “Neither Naïve nor Normative Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation.” Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 171: 265–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aakhus, Mark and Sally Jackson. 2005. “Technology, Interaction, and Design.” In The Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 879–934. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Aakhus, Mark. 2007. “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 741: 112-117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aitmatov, Chinghiz, and John French. 1983. The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years. Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botes, Johannes, and Jennifer Langdon. 2006. “Public Radio Talk Show Hosts and Social Conflict: An Analysis of Self-reported Roles During Debates and Discussion.” Journal of Radio Studies 13 1: 266–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1990. “Politeness Theory: Exemplar and Exemplary.” In The Legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in Cognition and Social Psychology, ed. by Irvin Rock, 23–38. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cai, Deborah A., and Colleen Tolan. 2020. “Public Shaming and Attacks on Social Media: The Case of White Evangelical Christians.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 131: 231–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canary, Daniel J., Cupach, William R., and Richard T. Serpe. 2001. “A Competence-Based Approach to Examining Interpersonal Conflict: Test of a Longitudinal Model.” Communication Research 281: 217 – 236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, Carrie. 2015. “Formulations.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, 1–5. John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1992. “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002. “Disagreements and Third Parties: Dilemmas of Neutralism in Panel News Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 1: 1385–1401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Duncan. 2002. “Linking Conflict Management Behaviors and Relational Satisfaction: The Intervening Role of Conflict Outcome Satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 191: 425–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo. 1998. “The Study of Controversies and the Theory of History and Science.” Science in Context 11 1: 147–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Erin E. 2015. “Difficult Conversations”. In International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Charles R. Berger, and Michael E. Roloff. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorjee, Tenzin, and Stella Ting-Toomey. 2020. “Understanding Intergroup Conflict Complexity: An Application of the Socioecological Framework and the Integrative Identity Negotiation Theory.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 131: 244–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, Sean M., Corple, Danielle, Buzzanell, Patrice M., Zoltowski, Carla, and Andrew Brightman. 2020. “Addressing Organizational Cultural Conflicts in Engineering with Design Thinking.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 131: 263–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs. 1994. “Ch. 6: Pragmatic Organization of Conversational Argument.” In Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, 91–116. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Donald G. 2020. “Talking to the Enemy: Difficult Conversations and Ethnopolitical Conflict.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 131: 183–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmertsen, Sofie. 2007. “Interviewers’ Challenging Questions in British Debate Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 1: 570–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1992. “On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 268–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara. 2011. Argumentation in Dispute Mediation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1991. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, ed. by Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D. 1990. “Introduction.” In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guxholli, Aurora, Voutilainen, Liisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2022. “What about You? Responding to a Face-threatening Question in Psychotherapy.” In Relationships in Organized Helping. Analyzing Interaction in Psychotherapy, Medical Encounters, Coaching and in Social Media, ed. by Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 79–104. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heisterkamp, Brian L. 2006. “Taking the Footing of a Neutral Mediator.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 231: 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess-Lüttich, Ernest W. B. 2007. “(Pseudo-)Argumentation in TV Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 1: 1360–1370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally. 1992. “Virtual Standpoints” and the Pragmatics of Conversational Argument. In Argumentation Illuminated, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, 260 – 269. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 2002. “Maintaining Neutrality in Dispute Mediation: Managing Disagreement while Managing not to Disagree.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1403–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus. 2002. “What Mediators Do with Words: Implementing Three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 201: 177–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 1981. “Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 451: 118–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena. 2002. “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics, 341: 1447–1471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kugler, Katharina G., and Peter T. Coleman. 2020. “Get Complicated: The Effects of Complexity on Conversations over Potentially Intractable Moral Conflicts.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 131: 211–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyratzis, Amy, and Jiansheng Guo. 2001. “Preschool Girls’ and Boys’ Verbal Conflict Strategies in the United States and China.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 341: 45–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin. 2007. “Conversational Violence in Political TV Debates: Forms and Functions.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 1: 1371–1387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Ifat, and Donald G. Ellis. 2001. “Going to Ground: Argument in Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian Encounter Groups.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 341: 399–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Ifat, and Paul Frosh. 2020. “Imagine all the People: Negotiating and Mediating Moral Concern through Intergroup Encounters.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 131: 197–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprain, Leah, Carcasson, Martin, and Andy Merolla. 2014. “Utilizing “on Tap” Experts in Deliberative Forums: Implications for Design.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 421: 150–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. “Moving forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis.” Discourse Studies, 141: 277–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2001. “Discourse Analysis in Communication”. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 725–249. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2015. “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue, 51: 355–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Confrontation and Collaboration in the Course of the Election Debate.” Language and Dialogue, 61: 370–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. “Practices of Topic and Dialogue Activity Management in Dispute Mediation.” Discourse Studies, 191: 341–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel. 1990. “The Sequential Organization of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict.” In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weger, Harry, and Mark Aakhus. 2003. “Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms: Argumentative Adaptations to Chat Room Design and Some Consequences for Public Deliberation at a Distance.” Argumentation and Advocacy 401: 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2024. Framing interactivity in complex communication of debate talk show. Language and Dialogue 14:3 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.