Cover not available
Article published In:
Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice
Edited by Alain Létourneau, Geneviève Boivin and Nicolas Bencherki
[Language and Dialogue 13:2] 2023
► pp. 254–276

Debate or dialogue?

A case of a Czech TV discussion program where dialogue fails

 | Masaryk University
The present paper deals with an example of a TV broadcast discussion program, the Czech program Máte slovo, in which a dialogue fails. It presents a closer analysis of one representative episode of the program, which, despite being officially presented as offering space for discussion and a chance for ordinary citizens to talk to public personalities and politicians, takes the form of confrontainment, whose goal is to escalate debate. The paper reveals what practices by the discussants and the moderator contribute to the failure of a successful dialogue and discusses the role of broadcast programs of this kind in the contemporary communication sphere.
Keywords: dialogue, media discourse, broadcast talk, “confrontalk”, televised debate, conversation analysis, discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Dialogue” and its presence in the Czech discussion program
  • 3.The Czech discussion program and its place in the context of media discourse
    • 3.1 Máte slovo as institutional dialogue
    • 3.2Participants in Máte slovo
    • 3.3 Máte slovo as “confrontalk”
  • 4.Design of the analysis
  • 5.Practices hindering the establishment of a successful dialogue
    • 5.1Violating rules of turn-taking, overlaps, and strong emotional states
    • 5.2Loaded questions, repeated questions, and reformulations
    • 5.3Argumentative fouls, attacks, and silencing
    • 5.4Lack of common ground and common communicative intentions
    • 5.5Moderator’s style and bias
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 1 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00149.zak
References (48)
References
Atkinson, Maxwell J. and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (Emerson, Caryl; Holquist, Michael, trans., ed.) Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G. 1991. Broadcasting finance in transition: a comparative handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G. and Stephen Coleman. 2010. “Political communication in freefall: The British case – and others?”. The International Journal of Press/Politics 15(2): 139–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohm, David. 1996. On Dialogue. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burger, Harald. 1995. “Konversationelle Gewalt in Fernsehgesprächen. In Hugger, P., Stadler, U. (eds), Gewalt. Kulturelle Formen in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Unionsverlag, 100–125. Zürich.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2001. “Managing Audience Participation. The Construction of Participation in an Audience Discussion Programme”. European Journal of Communication 16(2): 209–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpignano, Paolo, Robin Anderson, Stanley Aronowitz, and William Difazio. 1990. “Chatter in the Age of Electronic Reproduction: Talk Show and the “Public Mind””. Social Text 25/261: 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. and John C. Heritage. 2010. Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Cottle, Simon. 2002. “TV Agora and agoraphobia post-September 11”. In: Zelizer, B. and S. A. (eds) Journalism after September 11 1. London: Routledge: 178–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čmejrková, Světla. 1999. “Televizní interview a jiné duely: Mediální dialog jako žánr veřejného projevu”. Slovo a slovesnost, 60 (4): 247–268.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Mediální rozhovor jako žánr veřejného projevu”. In Jazyk, média, politika, ed. by Světla Čmejrková, and Jana Hoffmannová, 80–115. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction”. In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ekström, Mats and Eriksson, Göran. 2013. “Citizen Participation in Journalist Discourse: Multiplatform Political Interviews in the Swedish Election Campaign 2010”. In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, ed. by Mats Ekström and Andrew Tolson, 181–204. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. 2000. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans G. 1989. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 21 vols. Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Havlík, Martin. 2008. “Poznámky k práci moderátorů televizních politických debat a rozhlasových interview”. Jazykovědné aktuality, XLV (1–2): 4–32.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1998. “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Distinctive Turn-Taking Systems”. In Dialoganalyse VI (Volume 21) (Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of IADA – International Association forDialog Analysis), ed. by Světla Čmejrková, Jana Hoffmannová, Olga Müllerová, and Jana Svetlá, Tubingen: Niemeyer: 3–17. DOI logo
Hess-Lüttich, Ernest. W. B. 2007. “(Pseudo-)Argumentation in TV-debates”. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1360–1370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holly, Werner. 1994. “Confrontainment. Politik als Schaukampf im Fernsehen”. In Medienlust und Mediennutz. Unterhaltung als öffentliche Kommunikation, ed. by Bosshart, L., Hoffmann-Riem, W., 422–434. München: UVK.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction”. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Layman, Charles S. 1999. The Power of Logic. Mountain View, CA, USA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Linell, Petr. 1998. Aproaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia and Lunt, Peter. 1996. Talk on Television, Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri. 1990. Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin. 2007. “Conversational violence in political TV debates: Forms and functions”. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (8): 1371–1387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marková, Ivana. 2016. ”10. Dialogue and mutual understanding”. Verbal Communication, ed. by Andrea Rocci and Louis de Saussure, 181–202. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marková, Ivana, Per Linell, Michele Grossen and Anne Salazar-Orvig. 2007. Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared knowledge. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Máte, Slovo. 2021. Česká televize. Retrieved from: [URL]
Munson, Wayne. 1993. All talk: The talkshow in media culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Wood, Anja. 2022. “Introduction. When dialogue fails (and why)”. In Language and Dialogue 12 (1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priest, Patricia J. 1995. Public Intimacies. Talk Show Participants and Tell-All TV. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Rautajoki, Hanna. 2012. “Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion: The dramaturgical consequentiality of guest introductions”. Discourse Studies 14 (2): 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation”. Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1978. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation”. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Svoboda, Michal. 2019, September 27. “Drsná dohra včerejší Jílkové: Celý pořad zrušte. I vydlabaná dýně je chytřejší než Foldyna”. Eurozprávy.cz. Retrieved from: [URL]
Swearingen, Jan. 1990. Dialogue and dialectic: The logic of conversation and the interpretation of logic. In Maranhão (1990), 47–71.Google Scholar
Šťástková, Andrea. 2018, November 4. “Máte slovo s M. Jílkovou… když se o něj poperete”. E15.cz. Retrieved from: [URL]
Thiesmeyer, Lynn J. (ed.) 2003. Discourse and Silencing: Representation and the Language of Displacement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolson, Andrew. 2007. Media talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Van Bijnen, Emma. 2019. “Dialogical power negotiations in conflict mediation”. Language and Dialogue 9 (1): 84–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vanhaeght, Anne-Sofie and Donders, Karen. (2021). “Audience participation in public service media. From an instrumental to a purposeful vision”. AdComunica, 45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1999. “The fallacy of many questions: on the notions of complexity, loadedness and unfair entrapment in interrogative theory”. Argumentation 13 (4): 379–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar