Cover not available
Article published In:
Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice
Edited by Alain Létourneau, Geneviève Boivin and Nicolas Bencherki
[Language and Dialogue 13:2] 2023
► pp. 277–299

“Doing being an involved parent”

Practices for building the family-school partnership in parent-child homework dialogues

 | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
The present study investigates the increasingly common phenomenon of parental involvement in children’s education from a dialogic perspective. Drawing on video-recorded parent-child homework conversations in Italian families and adopting a conversation analysis-informed approach, the study analyzes how a value-laden cultural notion like ‘family-school partnership’ is given ‘dialogic existence’ through a variety of discursive practices. Specifically, it identifies four practices deployed by parents when supervising children’s homework: (1) making the teacher speak, (2) drawing parallels between family and school, (3) siding with the teacher, and (4) adopting a teacher-like evaluative stance. Beyond their specificities, all these practices reproduce the school’s institutional culture inside the home. It is argued that, through these practices, parents ‘do being involved’ in homework and implement a partnership based on shared values between family and school.
Keywords: parent-child dialogues, homework, parental involvement, family-school partnership, Italy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Parental involvement in homework: Recommendations from education studies and policies
  • 3.Data and analytic procedures
  • 4.‘Doing being involved’ in homework: Parents’ dialogic practices
    • 4.1Making the ‘teacher speak’
    • 4.2Drawing parallels between family and school
    • 4.3Siding with the teacher
    • 4.4Adopting a teacher-like evaluative stance
  • 5.Parental involvement and the family-school partnership as dialogic accomplishments. Concluding discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00150.col
References (76)
References
Bazzanella, Carla. 1993. “Dialogic Repetition.” In Dyaloganalyse IV, ed. by Heinrich Loffler, 185 – 294. Tubingen: Max Niemayer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennet, Sara and Nancy Kalish. 2006. The case against homework: How homework is hurting our children and what we can do about it. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Blackmore, Jill and Kristen Hutchinson. 2010. “Ambivalent Relations: The ‘Tricky Footwork’ of Parental Involvement in School Communities.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 14(5): 499–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2011. “Soliciting Accounts with Why-Interrogatives in Conversation.” Journal of Communication 611: 94–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, Ivana and Chiara Dalledonne Vandini. 2021. «La Correction des Devoirs à la Maison : Une Recherche Ethnographique avec des Mères et des Enfants en Italie.» La Revue Internationale de l’Education Familiale 491: 201 – 221Google Scholar
Booth, Alan and Judith F. Dunn (eds). 1996. Family-school Links. How Do They Affect Educational Outcomes? New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caronia, Letizia (ed.). 2021. Language and social interaction at home and school. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia and Chiara Dalledonne Vandini. 2019. “Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference: Participants’ resources to pursue (and resist) a no-problem trajectory.” Language and Dialogue 91: 125 – 148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia and Vittoria Colla. 2021. “Objects that matter: The hybrid and distributed agency in parent-assisted homework interactions.” Language and Dialogue 11(1): 8–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia, Vittoria Colla, and Ivana Bolognesi. Forthcoming. “When school language and culture enter the home: testing children as a ‘school-aligned’ parental activity.” Civitas Educationis.
Colla, Vittoria. 2022a. Children’s Socialization, Involved Parenting, and the Construction of the Family-School Partnership in Everyday Family Interactions: A Study on Parent-Assisted Homework as a Morally Dense Educational Arena. PhD Dissertation, University of Bologna.
. 2022b. ““Don’t complain and do it properly”: ‘Pedagogicalized parents’ and the morality of doing homework.” Rivista Italiana di Educazione Familiare 20(1): 211–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Harris. 1989a. “Synthesis of Research on Homework.” Educational Leadership 47(3): 85–91.Google Scholar
. 1989b. Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Harris, Jorgianne C. Robinson, and Erika A. Patall. 2006. “Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003.” Review of Educational Research 76(1): 1–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Communication Theory at the Center: Ventriloquism and the Communicative Constitution of Reality.” Journal of Communication 621: 1 – 20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François and Nicolas Bencherki. 2010. “How Things do Things with Words: Ventriloquism, Passion and Technology.” Encyclopaideia XIV(28): 35–62.Google Scholar
Costa, Marina, Ana Paula Cardoso, Carla Lacerda, Ana Lopes, and Celeste Gomes. 2016. “Homework in Primary Education from the Perspective of Teachers and Pupils.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2171: 139 – 148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012. “Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. Emotion in Interaction.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1998. “Complaints about Trangressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3–4): 295 – 325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul and Elizabeth Holt. 1988. “Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints.” Social Problems 35(4): 398–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Elinor Ochs. 1990. “Genitive Constructions and Agency in Samoan Discourse.” Studies in Language 14(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Joyce L. 1986. “Toward an Integrated Theory of School and Family Connections.” Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Report no. 3.Google Scholar
1990. “School and family connections: Theory research and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family.” In Families in Community Settings: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Donald G. Unger, and Marvin B. Sussman, 99–126. New York, NY: Haworth Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “School/Family/Community Partnerships. Caring for the Children We Share.” Phi Delta Kappan 76 (9): 701–712.Google Scholar
2001. School, Family and Community Partnerships. Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Lucas. 2009. Involved Parenthood: Everyday Lives of Swedish Middle-Class Families. Doctoral Thesis. Linköping University, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Linköping.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 181: 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1959. Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
. 1981. “Footing.” In Forms of Talk, ed. by Erving Goffman, 124–159. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gottzén, Lucas. 2011. “Involved Fatherhood? Exploring the Educational Work of Middle-Class Men.” Gender and Education 23(5): 619–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Anne T., and Nancy Berla. 1994. The Family Is Critical to Student Achievement. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984a. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1984b. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Epistemics.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2021. “Conversation Analysis: Practices and Methods.” In Qualitative Research, 5th Edition, ed. by David Silverman, 223–242. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoover-Dempsey, Kathleen V., Angela C. Battiato, Joan M. T. Walker, Richard P. Reed, Jennifer M. DeJong, and Kathleen P. Jones. 2001. “Parental Involvement in Homework.” Educational Psychologist 36(3): 195–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Alfie. 2006. The homework myth. Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Kralovec, Etta and John Buell. 2000. The End of Homework: How Homework Disrupts Families, Overburdens Children, and Limits Learning. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
. 2001. “End Homework Now.” Educational Leadership 58(7): 39–42.Google Scholar
Kremer-Sadlik, Tamar. 2019. “Ordinary Ethics and Reflexivity in Mundane Family Interactions.” Ethos 47(2): 190–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kremer-Sadlik, Tamar and Marilena Fatigante. 2015. “Investing in Children’s Future: Cross-Cultural Perspectives and Ideologies on Parental Involvement in Education.” Childhood 22(1): 67–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsico, Giuseppina, Koji Komatsu, and Antonio Iannaccone (eds.). 2013. Crossing Boundaries. Intercontextual Dynamics Between Family and School. Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. “‘What time is it, Denise?’ Asking known information questions in classroom discourse.” Theory into Practice 18(4): 285–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. “Multimodal Resources and the Organization of Social Interaction.” In Verbal Communication, ed. by Andrea Rocci, and Louis de Saussure, 329–350. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montalbetti, Katia and Cristina Lisimberti. 2020. “Dal confine alla soglia. I compiti a casa tra scuola e famiglia.” Pedagogia Oggi 11: 309–322.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Tamar Kremer-Sadlik. 2013. “The Good Enough Family.” In Fast Forward Family. Home, work and relationships in middle-class America, ed. by Elinor Ochs, and Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, 232–252. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Parodi, Maurizio. 2016. Basta Compiti! Non È Così che Si Impara. Milano: Sonda.Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2015. “Being a “Good Parent” in Parent–Teacher Conferences.” Journal of Communication 65(2): 373–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims.” Human Studies 9(2–3): 219–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Vivian Liberati, and Camilla Monaco. 2013. “How School Enters Family’s Everyday Life.” In Crossing Boundaries. Intercontextual Dynamics between Family and School, ed. by Giuseppina Marsico, Koji Komatsu, and Antonio Iannaccone, 3–34. Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
Popkewitz, Thomas S. 2003. “Governing the Child and Pedagogicalization of the Parent. A Historical Excursus into the Present.” In Governing Children, Families, and Education, ed. by Thomas S. Popkewitz, Marianne N. Bloch, Ingeborg Moqvist, and Kerstin Holmlund, 35–61. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On doing “being ordinary”.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Jörgen, and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2016. “Practice theory: What it is, its philosophical base, and what it offers organization studies.” In The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, ed. by Mir Raza, Hugh Willmott, and Michelle Greenwood, pp. 363–383. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair.” Discourse Processes 23(3): 499–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sterponi, Laura. 2003. “Account Episodes in Family Discourse: The making of morality in everyday interaction.” Discourse Studies 5(1): 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2013. Deontic Rights in Interaction. A Conversation Analytic Study on Authority and Cooperation. Academic dissertation, Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(3): 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig (eds). 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Joan. M. T., Kathleen V. Hoover-Dempsey, Darlene R. Whetsel, and Christa L. Green. 2004. Parental Involvement in Homework. A Review of Current Research and its Implications for Teachers, After School Program Staff, and Parents Leaders. Harvard Family Research Project.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wingard, Leah. 2006. “Parents’ Inquiries about Homework: The first Mention.” Text and Talk 26(4–5): 573–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wingard, Leah, and Lucas Forsberg. 2009. “Parent Involvement in Children’s Homework in American and Swedish Dual-earner Families.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1576–1595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar