Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 14:1 (2024) ► pp.3–32

Embodied action in remote online interaction

A preliminary investigation of hand raising gestures in a Zoom meeting

 | Bentley University
In this paper I use a conversation analytic approach to investigate how participants in a meeting held remotely via Zoom use embodied action to solicit selection as next speaker. When hand raising is not immediately successful, participants use embodied actions to withdraw, modify, upgrade, downgrade or reissue gestures in pursuit of selection as next speaker. Due to the technological affordances and limitations of the remote meeting environment, participants’ gestures and hand positions differ from what would typically occur in face-to-face interaction, resulting in frequent gestures near the face that provide for both visibility to the Zoom audience and easy transition to a raised hand position when necessary. I discuss these results in terms of our understanding of how technologically mediated virtual interaction through the internet impacts the use of embodied action, and how participants coordinate their embodied action and responses to it with turn taking and sequence completion.
Keywords: embodied action, gesture, online, conversation analysis, virtual, turn taking, hand raising
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Embodied action in remote online interaction
  • 2.Review of relevant literature: Gestures, embodied action, and remote meetings
    • 2.1Previous research on gestures in face to face interaction
    • 2.2Embodied action in meetings
    • 2.3Previous research on hand raising to facilitate turn taking
    • 2.4Embodied action in remote/video conference technologically mediated interactions
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Theoretical and analytical perspective
    • 3.2Data and participants
    • 3.3Approach to transcription
  • 4.Embodied action to request selection as next speaker by facilitator
    • 4.1The role of interactional context in successful hand raising
    • 4.2Unsuccessful use of hand raising
      • (1)Withdrawing the request by lowering the hand
      • (2)Creating a waiting posture by transforming the shape or position of the hand
      • (3)Reissuing, upgrading or downgrading the gesture
    • 4.3Pursuit of next speakership through transformations of gestures
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions: Gestures and turn taking in a remote meeting
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00152.gar
References (61)
References
Auer, Peter. 2014. “There’s no harm in glossing (but a need for a better understanding of the status of transcripts.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(1): 17–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayaß, Ruth. 2015. “Doing data: The status of transcripts in conversation analysis.” Discourse Studies 17(5): 508–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Rebecca. 2007. “Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk.” Text & Talk 27(3): 273–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birlik, Seval and Jagdish Kaur. 2020. “BELF expert users: Making understanding visible in internal BELF meetings through the use of nonverbal communication strategies.” English for Specific Purposes 581(2020): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Joseph P. Folger. 2005. The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Mediation and social justice: Risks and opportunities.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 27(1): 1–52.Google Scholar
Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Sally Ganong Pope. 2002. “Changing the quality of conflict interaction: The principles and practice of transformative mediation.” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 31: 67–96.Google Scholar
Button, Graham. 1987. “Moving out of closings.” In: Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and J. R. E. Lee, 101–151. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cibulka, Paul. 2015. “When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure.” Discourse Studies 17(1): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage (eds). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. and Trina Stickle. 2012. “Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices.” Discourse Studies 14(1): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gan, Yumei, Christian Greiffenhagen, and Christian Licoppe. 2020. “Orchestrated openings in video calls: Getting young left-behind children to greet their migrant parents.” Journal of Pragmatics 1701(2020): 364–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Angela Cora and Erik Cleven. n.d. “How reflection works in transformative dialogue/mediation: A preliminary investigation.” (unpublished paper, under review)
Garcia, Angela Cora, and Jennifer Baker Jacobs. 1998. “The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom.” Qualitative Sociology 21(3): 299–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Angela Cora and Jennifer Baker Jacobs. 1999. “Eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 32(4): 337–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Angela Cora. 2023. An Introduction to Interaction: Understanding Talk in the Workplace and Everyday Life. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1984. “Notes on story structure and the organization of participation.” In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian and Paul Luff. 1992. “Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction.” Human-Computer Interaction 7(3): 315–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, and Marcus Sanchez Svensson. 2007. “Video and qualitative research: Analysing medical practice and interaction.” Medical Education 41(1): 109–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian and Lorenza Mondada. 2019. “Transparency and embodied action: Turn organization and fairness in complex institutional environments.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82(3): 274–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mmhm’.” Papers in Linguistics 17(2): 197–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kääntä, Leila. 2012. “Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction.” Classroom Discourse 3(2): 166–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaukomaa, Timo, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2014. “Foreshadowing a problem: Turn-opening frowns in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 711(2014): 132–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. and Geoffrey Raymond. 2021. “Body trouble: Some sources of difficulty in the progressive realization of manual action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 54(3): 277–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian. 2017a. “Skype appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’: The sequential organization of video-mediated conversation openings.” Pragmatics 27(3): 351–386.Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Showing objects in Skype video-mediated conversations: From showing gestures to showing sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics 1101(2017): 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “The politics of visuality and talk in French courtroom proceedings with video links and remote participants.” Journal of Pragmatics 1781(2021): 363–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian and Julien Morel. 2012. “Video-in-interaction: ‘Talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(4): 399–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia. 2018. “Disagreeing without a ‘no’: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom.” Journal of Pragmatics 1371(2018): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luff, Paul. 2016. “Embedded reference: Translocating gestures in video-mediated interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 49(4): 342–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luff, Paul and Christian Heath. 2012. “Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: Social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective.” Qualitative Research 12(3): 255–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luff, Paul, Menisha Patel, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Christian Heath. 2014. “Assembling collaboration: Informing the design of interaction spaces.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 47(3): 317–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markaki, Vassiliki and Lorenza Mondada. 2012. “Embodied orientations towards co-participants in multinational meetings.” Discourse Studies 14(1): 31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. “Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers.” Discourse Studies 9(2): 194–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Video recording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interactional order: Some systematic uses of the split-screen technique.” Human Studies 32(1): 67–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 461(2013): 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristian. 2016. “The body as a resource for other-initiation of repair: Cupping the hand behind the ear.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1): 34–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbertz-Siitonen, Margarethe, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh. 2021. “Coordinating action in technology-supported shared tasks: Virtual pointing as a situated practice for mobilizing a response.” Language & Communication 791: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred-dispreferred turn shapes.” In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2018. “Composite social actions: The case of factual declaratives in everyday interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(4): 379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harold. 1972. “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology.” In: Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2002. “Home position.” Gesture 2(2): 133–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50(4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahlström, Fritjof J. 2002. “The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 37(2): 47–57.Google Scholar
Satar, Müge H. 2016. “Meaning-making in online language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing.” ReCALL 28(3): 305–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. “On some gestures’ relation to talk.” In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000. “Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language in Society 29(1): 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening up closings.” Semiotica 8(4): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, Anja. 2009. “Herausforderungen der multimodalen Transkription: Methodische und theoretische Überlegungen aus der wissenschaftlichen Praxis.” [“Challenges of multimodal transcription. Methodical and theoretical considerations from scientific practice.”] In: Die Arbeit mit Transkripten in Fortbildung, Lehre und Forschung, ed. by Karin Birkner and Anja Stukenbrock, 144–169. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2009a. “Forward-gesturing.” Discourse Processes 46(2–3): 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall, and Barry Brown. 2021. “Making time: Pausing to coordinate video instructions and practical tasks.” Symbolic Interaction 44(3): 603–631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Language and dialogue in philosophy and science.” Intercultural Pragmatics 18(4): 533–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “Principles of New Science Dialogue between science and philosophy.” Language and Dialogue 13(1): 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zouinar, Moustafa and Julia Velkovska. 2017. “Talking about things: Image-based topical talk and intimacy in video-mediated family communication.” Pragmatics 27(3): 387–418.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Garcia, Angela Cora & Erik Cleven
2024. How Reflection Works in Transformative Dialogue/Mediation: A Preliminary Investigation. Qualitative Sociology Review 20:2 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.