Article published In:
(Inter)Cultural Dialogues
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 13:3] 2023
► pp. 383406
Attardo, Salvatore
2020The Linguistics of Humor. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023Humor 2.0: How the Internet Changed Humor. London, New York: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael
2005Laughter and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2008 “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrell, Amy
1997 “Humor Communities”. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 10 (1): 11–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chłopicki, Władysław
2009 “The “Szkło kontaktowe” show: A return to the old irrationality?” In Permitted laughter: socialist, post-socialist and never-socialist humour, ed. by Arvo Krikmann and Liisi Laineste, 171–181. Tartu: ELM Scholarly Press.Google Scholar
Colman, Andrew M., and Gorman, L. Paul
1982 “Conservatism, Dogmatism, and Authoritarianism in British Police Officers.” Sociology 16 (1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daviess, Beth
2019 “Making Memes and Shitposting: The Powerful Political Discourse of Alt-right Meme Culture” (June 5, 2019). Available at [URL]
Eagleton, Terry
2019Humour. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, Sonja et al.
2020 “Benevolent and Corrective Humor, Life Satisfaction, and Broad Humor Dimensions: Extending the Nomological Network of the BenCor across 25 Countries.” Journal of Happiness Studies 21 (7): 2473–2492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hietalahti, Jarno
2023 “Book review: Weaver, Simon (2022). The Rhetoric of Brexit Humour: Comedy, Populism and the EU Referendum. London and New York: Routledge.” The European Journal of Humour Research 11 (1): 218–222.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2010 “The Paradox of Communication: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Society 1 (1): 50–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “A Dialogic Approach to Pragmatics.” Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4): 26–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde
2009 “Humor Styles and Symbolic Boundaries.” Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2): 219–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “Humour and Polarization: How the Clown Style in 21st Century Drives People Apart, in Politics and Beyond.”
Laaksonen, Salla-Maria, Joonas Koivukoski, and Merja Porttikivi
2022 “Clowning around a Polarized Issue: Rhetorical Strategies and Communicative Outcomes of a Political Parody Performance by Loldiers of Odin.” New Media & Society 24 (8): 1912–1931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruch, Willibald
1992 “Assessment of Appreciation of Humor: Studies with the 3 WD Humor Test.” In Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 91, ed. by Charles D. Spielberger and James N. Butcher, 27–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Săftoiu, Răzvan
Sienkiewicz, Matt and Nick Marx
2022That’s not Funny: How the Right Makes Comedy Work for Them. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, James
2009Humboldt, Worldview and Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2012Ethnolinguistics and Cultural Concepts: Truth, Love, Hate and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhulst, Brad, Lindon J. Eaves, and Peter K. Hatemi
2012 “Correlation not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies.” American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 34–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Simon
2022The Rhetoric of Brexit Humour: Comedy, Populism and the EU Referendum. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2017 “The Mixed Game Model: A Holistic Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2021 “Dialogue: The Complex Whole.” Language and Dialogue 11 (3): 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zijp, Dick
2014Re-thinking Dutch Cabaret: The Conservative Implications of Humour in the Dutch Cabaret Tradition. MA Thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Żygulski, Kazimierz
1976Wspólnota śmiechu. Studium socjologiczne komizmu [Community of Laughter. A Sociological Study of Comedy]. Warszawa: PIW.Google Scholar