Article published In:
(Inter)Cultural DialoguesEdited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 13:3] 2023
► pp. 383–406
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 13:3] 2023
► pp. 383–406
The drama of dialogue action in distinct discourse spaces
Conservative and liberal humour in television talk shows
The article addresses the issue of intracultural dialogue between two strong political mindsets, liberal and conservative. This polarization is typical of contemporary cultural divides and emerges in the public sphere through mass media, often finding its outlet through humour, which may be treated as a mediating factor. It will be discussed on the example of a popular Polish humorous talk show broadcast on the public TV channel as compared to one broadcast on commercial television. The central finding of the study, seemingly replicable for other languages and television cultures, is the discovery of the central item on the discursive agenda, i.e., a worldview hiding in the conservative epistemic stance that assumes the authority of the journalists running the show.
Keywords: conservatism, political satire, cultural mindset, dialogue action, polarization strategies, Polish television shows
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Right-wing vs left-wing humour in the lens of dialogue scholars and humour scholars
- 3.Conservative vs liberal stance: The Polish style
- 4.The two Polish talk shows in counterpoint
- 5.Analysis of selected examples
- 5.1Speaker’s authority – Omniscient satirist (WTW) vs speaker’s distance (SZK)
- 5.2Humour targets and negative sterotypes
- 5.3Sarcasm and irony
- 5.4Play of imagination vs targeted humour
- 5.5The literal vs the metaphorical
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Attardo, Salvatore
2020 The
Linguistics of Humor. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
2023 Humor
2.0: How the Internet Changed Humor. London, New York: Anthem Press.
Billig, Michael
2005 Laughter
and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of
Humour. London: Sage.
Cap, Piotr
2008 “Towards
the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse”. Journal of
Pragmatics 401: 17–41.
Carrell, Amy
1997 “Humor
Communities”. Humor: International Journal of Humor
Research 10 (1): 11–24.
Chłopicki, Władysław
2009 “The “Szkło kontaktowe” show: A return to the old irrationality?” In Permitted laughter: socialist, post-socialist and never-socialist humour, ed. by Arvo Krikmann and Liisi Laineste, 171–181. Tartu: ELM Scholarly Press.
Colman, Andrew M., and Gorman, L. Paul
1982 “Conservatism,
Dogmatism, and Authoritarianism in British Police
Officers.” Sociology 16 (1): 1–11.
Daviess, Beth
2019 “Making
Memes and Shitposting: The Powerful Political Discourse of Alt-right Meme Culture” (June 5, 2019). Available at [URL]
Eagleton, Terry
2019 Humour. Yale: Yale University Press.
Heinz, Sonja et al.
2020 “Benevolent
and Corrective Humor, Life Satisfaction, and Broad Humor Dimensions: Extending the Nomological Network of the BenCor across 25
Countries.” Journal of Happiness
Studies 21 (7): 2473–2492.
Hietalahti, Jarno
2023 “Book
review: Weaver, Simon (2022). The Rhetoric of Brexit Humour: Comedy, Populism and the EU
Referendum. London and New York: Routledge.” The European Journal of Humour
Research 11 (1): 218–222.
Kecskes, Istvan
2010 “The
Paradox of Communication: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and
Society 1 (1): 50–73.
2016 “A
Dialogic Approach to Pragmatics.” Russian Journal of
Linguistics 20 (4): 26–42.
Kuipers, Giselinde
2009 “Humor
Styles and Symbolic Boundaries.” Journal of Literary
Theory 3 (2): 219–240.
forthcoming. “Humour
and Polarization: How the Clown Style in 21st Century Drives People Apart, in Politics and
Beyond.”
Laaksonen, Salla-Maria, Joonas Koivukoski, and Merja Porttikivi
2022 “Clowning
around a Polarized Issue: Rhetorical Strategies and Communicative Outcomes of a Political Parody Performance by Loldiers of
Odin.” New Media &
Society 24 (8): 1912–1931.
Ruch, Willibald
1992 “Assessment
of Appreciation of Humor: Studies with the 3 WD Humor
Test.” In Advances in Personality
Assessment, Vol. 91, ed. by Charles D. Spielberger and James N. Butcher, 27–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2014 “Review
of Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization. The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance
Crossing
.” Language and
Dialogue 4 (3): 497–499.
Sienkiewicz, Matt and Nick Marx
2022 That’s
not Funny: How the Right Makes Comedy Work for
Them. Oakland: University of California Press.
Underhill, James
2009 Humboldt,
Worldview and Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2012 Ethnolinguistics
and Cultural Concepts: Truth, Love, Hate and
War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verhulst, Brad, Lindon J. Eaves, and Peter K. Hatemi
2012 “Correlation
not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies.” American
Journal of Political
Science 56(1): 34–51.
Weaver, Simon
2022 The
Rhetoric of Brexit Humour: Comedy, Populism and the EU Referendum. London and New York: Routledge.
Weigand, Edda
2017 “The
Mixed Game Model: A Holistic Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of
Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand. New York and London: Routledge.
Zijp, Dick
2014 Re-thinking
Dutch Cabaret: The Conservative Implications of Humour in the Dutch Cabaret Tradition. MA
Thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Żygulski, Kazimierz
1976 Wspólnota śmiechu. Studium socjologiczne komizmu [Community of
Laughter. A Sociological Study of
Comedy]. Warszawa: PIW.