Cover not available
Article published In:
(Inter)Cultural Dialogues
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 13:3] 2023
► pp. 407–426

Ethnic humour in cartoons

A dialogic perspective

| Transilvania University of Brașov
| Transilvania University of Brașov
Cartoons are designed as a response to a social event and aim to create a humorous effect in the audience through their multimodal discourse. The interpretation requires contextual and cultural information which has to be shared by the cartoonist and the audience. Our research focuses on the dialogue of humorous cartoons between the West and the East. From a dialogic perspective, the action, i.e., the cartoons published in the French and Swiss media, generates a reaction in the Romanian media. We discuss the transfer of national stereotypes at a European level and show that, although the cartoons target a particular out-group, they ricochet to another group. Thus, new boundaries are set up and humour functions as a divisive social activity.
Keywords: ethnicity, ethnic representations, cartoons, stereotypes, Romani, Romanian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research on cartoons
    • 2.1From illustrations to complex forms
    • 2.2Some Romanian contributions
    • 2.3From editorial cartoons to ethnic cartoons
  • 3.Theoretical perspective and methodology
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Historical and social context
    • 4.2Playing with stereotypes
    • 4.3The dialogic dimension of cartoons
      • 4.3.1The Swiss cartoon
      • 4.3.2The Romanian response
      • 4.3.3The French cartoon
      • 4.3.4The Romanian response
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00159.saf
References (41)
References
Al-Masri, Hanada. 2016. “Jordanian editorial cartoons: A multimodal approach to the cartoons of Emad Hajjaj.” Language and Communication 501: 45–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1998. “The analysis of humorous narratives.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 11(3): 231–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleahu Ana. 2006. “Italia: Între informal şi ilegal, toleraţi, dar nelegalizaţi.” In Locuirea temporară în străinătate, Migraţia economică a românilor: 1990–2006, Sandu Dumitru (coord.), 85–91. Bucureşti: Fundaţia pentru o Societate Deschisă.Google Scholar
Brône, Geert and Kurt Feyaerts. 2003. “The Cognitive Linguistics of Incongruity Resolution: Marked Reference Point Structures in Humour.” Available at [URL]
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica. 2020. “Pictorial verbal interplay in Romanian cartoons.” In Romanian Humour, ed. by Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu, Stanca Măda, and Răzvan Săftoiu, 89–114. Kraków: Tertium.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana. 2002. “What’s so Funny: Conceptual Integration in Humorous Examples”. [URL]
Davies, Christie. 1990. Ethnic Humour Around the World: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. “A general theory of jokes whose butts are the stupid and the canny .” Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 54(1): 7–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degano, Chiara. 2017. “Visual Arguments in Activist’s Campaign. A Pragmadialectical Perspective.” In Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multidisciplinary perspectives, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone, 291–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Allen, Fadwa Malti-Douglas. 1994. Arab comic strips: Politics of an Emerging Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles and Billy Clark. 2014. “Can pictures have explicatures?” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14(3): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London, New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genova, Dafina. 2018. “Complementarity of Image and Text in Political Cartoons: Three Case Studies.” Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies 27(2): 143–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation”. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 31. Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Robert C. 2009. “How Comics Came to Be: Through the Juncture of Word and Image from Magazine Gag Cartoons to Newspaper Strips, Tools for Critical Appreciation Plus Rare Seldom Witnessed Historical Facts”. In A Comics Studies Reader, ed. by Jeet Heer and Kent Worcester, 25–45. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
2010. “Defining Comics Again: Another in the Long List of Unnecessarily Complicated Definitions”. The Comics Journal, 20.12.2010. Available at [URL]
Hempelmann, Christian F. and Andrea C. Samson. 2008. “Cartoons: Drawn jokes?” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 609-640. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kogălniceanu, Mihail. 1837. Esquisse sur l’histoire, les moeurs et la langue des Cigains, connus en France sous le nom de Bohémiens. Berlin: Librairie de B. BehrGoogle Scholar
Kronenfeld, David. 2008. “Cultural models.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5(1): 67–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana. 2008. –Cognition and culture in political cartoons.– Intercultural Pragmatics 5(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Măda, Stanca. 2020. “A Pragmatic Analysis of Political Cartoons.” In Exploring Discourse Practices in Romanian, ed. by Andra Vasilescu, Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu, Gabriela Stoica, Jonathan Russel White, 146–167. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
McCloud, Scott. 1993. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Negro, Isabel. 2014. “Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning.” Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación 57(57): 59–84.Google Scholar
Plug, H. Jose. 2017. “Attacks on the Cartoonist’s Strategic Manoeuvring. An Argumentative Analysis of Criticism on Political Cartoons.” In Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone, 317–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samson, Andrea C. and Oswald Huber. 2007. “The Interaction of Cartoonist’s Gender and Formal Features of Cartoons.” Humor 20(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandu, Ion. 2018. Istoria și tradițiile minorității rrome: manual pentru clasa a VI-a. București: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică.Google Scholar
Săftoiu, Răzvan. 2017. “Categoria etnică din perspectivă lingvistică.” Diacronia 5, A73 (1–9). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Șerbănescu, Horia Vladimir. 2013. “Caricatura militară în presa umoristică românească de la unire până la războiul cel mare (1859–1916)”. Studii și cercetări de istoria artei. Artă plastică, serie nouă 3(47): 9–48.Google Scholar
Tasić, Miloš and Dušan Stamenković. 2015. “The interplay of words and images in expressing multimodal metaphors in comics.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2121: 117–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2009. “Language and Image Interaction in Cartoons: Towards a Multimodal Theory of Humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(6): 1171–1188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tudor, Noémi. 2020. “Constructing Ethnic Identity in Transylvania through Humour.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae 12(2): 144–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Interethnic jokes in Transylvania. The case of Gypsy jokes.” Bulletin of Transilvania University of Brașov, Seria IV. Philology. Cultural Studies 15(64): 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2012. “Professional action games. Theory and practice.” In Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Stanca Măda, Răzvan Săftoiu, 43–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “The Dialogic Action Game.” Dialogue Analysis VII: Working with Dialogue (Selected Papers from the 7th IADA Conference, Birmingham 1999), 1–18. DOI logo
. 2010. Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2016. Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zafiu, Rodica. 2009. “Păcatele Limbii: Rom.” România Literară 101.Google Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir. 2000 (2008). “Culture and Communication.” In Culturally Speaking, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 48–70. London/New York: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar