Review published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 14:1 (2024) ► pp.163169
References
Aakhus, Mark
2007 “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 741: 112-117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1992Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooren, François
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
2005 “Theoretical Construction and Argumentation Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalized Types of Argumentation Activity.” In The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, ed. by David Hitchcock, 75–84. Hamilton: McMaster University.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott and Sally Jackson
1981 “Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication 451: 118–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally
1992 “ ‘Virtual Standpoints’ and the Pragmatics of Conversational Argument.” In Argumentation Illuminated, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, 260–269. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen S.
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures in Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas
1998The New Dialectic: Conversational Context of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “The Place of Dialogue Theory in Logic, Computer Science and Communication Studies.” Synthese 1231: 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2006 “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation 201: 59–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar