A speaker-oriented multidimensional approach to risks and causes of miscommunication
Arto Mustajoki | University of Helsinki, Finland
Combining ideas from different research directions and fields, the paper presents a multidimensional model of communication which enables to explain the risks of communication more comprehensively than before. The process of producing and interpreting speech is described through a message transfer circle. The model also includes the mental worlds of the speaker and the recipient, which substantially influence interaction. In addition, special attention is paid to recipient design, which plays a crucial role in interaction. One may even argue that such frequently mentioned factors as misreference or ambiguity are not causes of miscommunication but only risks for it; the real cause of miscommunication is incomplete recipient design. The common denominator is the egocentrism of the speaker: avoidance of cognitive effort, common ground fallacy, emotional overdrive, obstacles caused by physiological state or physical defects, and attaching greater importance to other things at the expense of recipient design.
Keywords: miscommunication, human interaction, mental world, common ground fallacy, communication failure, risk of communication, functional approach, recipient design, egocentrism, speaker orientation
Published online: 13 August 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.2.03mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.2.03mus
Cited by
Cited by 33 other publications
No author info given
2018.
In Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 286],
Bazzanella, Carla
2015.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Bazzanella, Carla
2019. The Complex Process of Mis/Understanding Spatial Deixis in Face-To-Face Interaction
.
Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bell, Nancy D.
2018.
In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294],
► pp. 291 ff.
Cruz, Manuel Padilla
2015.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Cruz, Manuel Padilla
2019. Qualifying insults, offensive epithets, slurs and expressive expletives.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
Hautamäki, Antti
2020.
In Viewpoint Relativism [Synthese Library, 419],
► pp. 13 ff.
Hautamäki, Antti
2020.
In Viewpoint Relativism [Synthese Library, 419],
► pp. 37 ff.
Hietaranta, Pertti
2018.
In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195],
► pp. 215 ff.
Linell, Per
2015. Mishearings are occasioned by contextual assumptions and situational affordances.
Language & Communication 40 ► pp. 24 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2017. Evidence and presumptions for analyzing and detecting misunderstandings.
Pragmatics & Cognition 24:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio, Chrysi Rapanta, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus & Mercè Garcia-Milà
2022. Coding empathy in dialogue.
Journal of Pragmatics 192 ► pp. 116 ff.
Mustajoki, Arto
2017.
In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274],
► pp. 55 ff.
Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Bajkulova
2020. The risks of misunderstandings in family discourse.
Language and Dialogue 10:3 ► pp. 340 ff.
Mustajoki, Arto & Tatiana Sherstinova
2017.
In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10458],
► pp. 710 ff.
Mustajoki, Arto, Tatiana Sherstinova & Ulla Tuomarla
2018.
In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],
► pp. 189 ff.
Müller-Wood, Anja
2022. Introduction.
Language and Dialogue 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2013. Metapsychological awareness of comprehension and epistemic vigilance of L2 communication in interlanguage pragmatic development.
Journal of Pragmatics 59 ► pp. 117 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2014. Pragmatic failure, epistemic injustice and epistemic vigilance.
Language & Communication 39 ► pp. 34 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2017. Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance.
Research in Language 15:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2018. Expressive APs and expletive NPs revisited: Refining the extant relevance-theoretic procedural account.
Lingua 205 ► pp. 54 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2018. Pragmatic Competence Injustice.
Social Epistemology 32:3 ► pp. 143 ff.
Petrova, Anna A., Elzara V. Gafiyatova, Nadezhda A. Sytina & Marina I. Solnyshkina
2022.
In Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century - Science and Technology [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 342],
► pp. 660 ff.
Petukhov, Alexandr Y. & S. A. Polevaya
2016. Modeling of information images dynamics through the communicative field method.
International Journal of Biomathematics 09:04 ► pp. 1650057 ff.
Petukhov, Alexandr Y. & Sofia A. Polevaya
2017. Modeling of Communicative Individual Interactions Through the Theory of Information Images.
Current Psychology 36:3 ► pp. 428 ff.
Petukhov, Alexandr Y., Sofia A. Polevaya & Vladimir G. Yakhno
2016. The theory of information images: Modeling based on diffusion equations.
International Journal of Biomathematics 09:06 ► pp. 1650087 ff.
Pietikäinen, Kaisa S.
2016. Misunderstandings and Ensuring Understanding in Private ELF Talk.
Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw005 ff.
Rautiainen, Iira
2021.
In Discourse and Conflict,
► pp. 381 ff.
Ryan, Jonathon
2015. Reconstructing miscommunications for the language classroom.
ELT Journal 69:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
Shibata, Miki
2021. Japanese L2 English Learners’ Positions in Miscommunication: Who Is Responsible for Failures?.
Journal of Language, Identity & Education ► pp. 1 ff.
Trbojević Milošević, Ivana
2019. Skidding on common ground: A socio-cognitive approach to problems in intercultural communicative situations.
Journal of Pragmatics 151 ► pp. 118 ff.
Tzanne, Angeliki
2015.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Wu, Albert W
2018. Reaching common ground: The role of shared mental models in patient safety.
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management 23:5 ► pp. 183 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.