Combining ideas from different research directions and fields, the paper presents a multidimensional model of communication which enables to explain the risks of communication more comprehensively than before. The process of producing and interpreting speech is described through a message transfer circle. The model also includes the mental worlds of the speaker and the recipient, which substantially influence interaction. In addition, special attention is paid to recipient design, which plays a crucial role in interaction. One may even argue that such frequently mentioned factors as misreference or ambiguity are not causes of miscommunication but only risks for it; the real cause of miscommunication is incomplete recipient design. The common denominator is the egocentrism of the speaker: avoidance of cognitive effort, common ground fallacy, emotional overdrive, obstacles caused by physiological state or physical defects, and attaching greater importance to other things at the expense of recipient design.
2024. ePUZSOLVED: Learning communication models through interactive online puzzles. Communication Teacher 38:2 ► pp. 95 ff.
Bean, Hamilton, Amy Hasinoff & Sarah Fields
2024. Defining public warning failure. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 32:3
Peet, Andrew
2024. The puzzle of plausible deniability. Synthese 203:5
Yan, Rong, Tengfei Feng & Samad Zare
2024. A Cognitive Study on Politeness Intention Processing and Its Association with Pragmatic Failure in Cross-Cultural Communication. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 47:3 ► pp. 481 ff.
2023. How people perceive and talk about miscommunication. Journal of Pragmatics 217 ► pp. 140 ff.
Shibata, Miki
2023. Japanese L2 English Learners’ Positions in Miscommunication: Who Is Responsible for Failures?. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 22:6 ► pp. 589 ff.
Leskelä, Leealaura, Arto Mustajoki & Aino Piehl
2022. Easy and plain languages as special cases of linguistic tailoring and standard language varieties. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio, Chrysi Rapanta, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus & Mercè Garcia-Milà
2022. Coding empathy in dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 192 ► pp. 116 ff.
Müller-Wood, Anja
2022. Introduction. Language and Dialogue 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Petrova, Anna A., Elzara V. Gafiyatova, Nadezhda A. Sytina & Marina I. Solnyshkina
2022. Technologies in Analysis and Computing Immediate Recalls. In Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century - Science and Technology [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 342], ► pp. 660 ff.
Rautiainen, Iira
2021. Talk and Action as Discourse in UN Military Observer Course: Routines and Practices of Navigation. In Discourse and Conflict, ► pp. 381 ff.
Hautamäki, Antti
2020. Conditions of a Philosophical Discussion. In Viewpoint Relativism [Synthese Library, 419], ► pp. 13 ff.
Hautamäki, Antti
2020. Points of View and Relativism. In Viewpoint Relativism [Synthese Library, 419], ► pp. 37 ff.
2022. Avoidance of cognitive efforts as a risk factor in interaction. Discourse Studies 24:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
Trbojević Milošević, Ivana
2019. Skidding on common ground: A socio-cognitive approach to problems in intercultural communicative situations. Journal of Pragmatics 151 ► pp. 118 ff.
2017. The “Retrospective Commenting” Method for Longitudinal Recordings of Everyday Speech. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10458], ► pp. 710 ff.
Petukhov, Alexandr Y. & Sofia A. Polevaya
2017. Modeling of Communicative Individual Interactions Through the Theory of Information Images. Current Psychology 36:3 ► pp. 428 ff.
Petukhov, Alexandr Y. & S. A. Polevaya
2016. Modeling of information images dynamics through the communicative field method. International Journal of Biomathematics 09:04 ► pp. 1650057 ff.
Petukhov, Alexandr Y., Sofia A. Polevaya & Vladimir G. Yakhno
2016. The theory of information images: Modeling based on diffusion equations. International Journal of Biomathematics 09:06 ► pp. 1650087 ff.
Pietikäinen, Kaisa S.
2016. Misunderstandings and Ensuring Understanding in Private ELF Talk. Applied Linguistics► pp. amw005 ff.
Bazzanella, Carla
2015. Grammar and Emotion. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Bazzanella, Carla
2019. The Complex Process of Mis/Understanding Spatial Deixis in Face-To-Face Interaction
. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cruz, Manuel Padilla
2015. Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
2013. Metapsychological awareness of comprehension and epistemic vigilance of L2 communication in interlanguage pragmatic development. Journal of Pragmatics 59 ► pp. 117 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2014. Pragmatic failure, epistemic injustice and epistemic vigilance. Language & Communication 39 ► pp. 34 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2017. Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance. Research in Language 15:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2018. Pragmatic Competence Injustice. Social Epistemology 32:3 ► pp. 143 ff.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2018. Expressive APs and expletive NPs revisited: Refining the extant relevance-theoretic procedural account. Lingua 205 ► pp. 54 ff.
Linell, Per
2015. Mishearings are occasioned by contextual assumptions and situational affordances. Language & Communication 40 ► pp. 24 ff.
Ryan, Jonathon
2015. Reconstructing miscommunications for the language classroom. ELT Journal 69:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
Ryan, Jonathon
2023. Miscommunicated referent tracking in L2 English: a case-by-case analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1543 ff.
Tzanne, Angeliki
2015. Miscommunication and Misunderstandings. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.