Article published in:
Certainty and Uncertainty in Dialogue
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski
[Language and Dialogue 4:1] 2014
► pp. 76–92

Obama said it

Quoting as an evidential strategy in online discussion forums

| University of Würzburg, Germany
Quoting constitutes a well documented evidential strategy across languages. This article examines an English collection of comments in online political discussion forums, which covers a wide spectrum of patterns with 1) overt stance-taking plus a direct quotation at one end and 2) implicit stance-taking without quotation at the other. The notions of deixis and accountability are used in order to explicate the evidential function of quotations in the practices of stance-taking observed: While pattern 1) achieves participants’ maximum accountability and entitlement to making their claims, pattern 2) is associated with minimum accountability and entitlement. The findings are discussed in light of knowledge management and epistemic authority.
Keywords: quotations, online discussion forums, accountability, evidentiality, deixis
Published online: 20 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.1.05reb
References
Bös, Birte, and Sonja Kleinke
2012 “Complex Uses of Quotations in English and German Online Discussion Fora.” Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Quotation and Meaning (ICQM 3) , 19-21 April 2012, University of Augsburg.
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach
2011 “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach, 1-33. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E
1992 “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2006 “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (5): 569-595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2009 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: On the Close Relationship between Two Different Categories.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 44-62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2007 “Assessing and Accounting.” In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 81-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
1999 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18 (1): 83-101.Google Scholar
2005 “Encoding Speaker Perspective: Evidentials.” In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, and David S. Rood, 379-397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diakopoulos, Nicholas, and Mor Naaman
2011 “Towards Quality Discourse in Online News Comments.” Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2011) , March 2011.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139-182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt
1988 “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35 (4): 398-417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64 (3): 501-538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A
2001 “Evidentiality: Authority, Responsibility, and Entitlement in English Conversation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11 (2): 167-192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2007 “The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk.” Language in Society 36 (3): 319-341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219-245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Christa Dürscheid
2012 “The Linguistics of Keyboard-to-Screen Communication: A New Terminological Framework.” Linguistik Online 56 (6/12): 39–64. http://​www​.linguistik​-online​.de​/56​_12​/juckerDuerscheid​.pdf (last accessed 05/12/13)Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35 (5): 677-705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth
2012 “Evidentiality in English. A Functional Approach.” Paper presented at the Linguistisches Kolloquium, University of Würzburg, 31 January 2012.
Reber, Elisabeth, and Anita Fetzer
Forthcoming. “Quoting in Political Discourse: Professional Talk Meets Ordinary Postings.” In Quoting Now and Then ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Monika Kirner, and Wolfram Bublitz Leiden, et al. Brill
Walther, Joseph B., Caleb T. Carr, Scott Seung W. Choi, David C. DeAndrea, Jinsuk Kim, Stephanie Tom Tong, and Brandon Van der Heide
2010 “Interaction of Interpersonal, Peer, and Media Influence Sources Online: A Research Agenda for Technology Convergence.” In The Networked Self, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 17-38. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, H.L
2011 “Missed Cues: How Disputes Can Socialize Virtual Newcomers.” Language@Internet 8: article 51.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
1998 Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, et al.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin, and Simon Alistone
2008 “Participation, Procedure and Accountability: ‘You Said’ Speech Markers in Negotiating Reports of Ambiguous Phenomena.” Discourse Studies 10 (3): 407-427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kraut, Joshua
2019. The polyphonic pastor. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 418 ff. Crossref logo
Tabbert, Ulrike
2016.  In Language and Crime, ► pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.