Article published in:Certainty and Uncertainty in Dialogue
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski
[Language and Dialogue 4:1] 2014
► pp. 132–148
Evidential and epistemic strategies in Romanian parliamentary debates
The paper presents some evidential and epistemic strategies that appear frequently in old and present-day Romanian parliamentary debates. By evidential and epistemic strategy we mean the manipulation of evidential and epistemic markers, either grammaticalized or pragmatic, in order to achieve various interactional and rhetorical aims. We have in view not only encoded evidential and epistemic meanings, but also (interactional) inferentially conveyed evidential and epistemic meanings. Modality can be manipulated in various ways: the usual ranking of evidentials can be reinterpreted for argumentative means: i.e., hearsay can be sometimes rejected, while, in other cases, it can be presented as more reliable than perceptual evidence.
Keywords: evidentiality, epistemic, interaction, strategy, context dependency.
Published online: 20 May 2014
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
Cornillie, Bert, and Paola Pietrandrea
Hanks, William F.
Nuckolls, Janis, and Lev Michael
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, and Karin Aijmer
Brătianu, Ion I.C.
Carp, Petre P.