Strategic uses of certainty and uncertainty in a political debate
The paper analyses the contribution of modal forms expressing certainty and uncertainty to the construal of a politician’s ethos. Deontic modals are considered implicit evidentials. The theoretical and methodological background of the analysis is provided by pragmatics and discourse analysis, as discourse is the main place where ethos is construed. The illustrative data are selected from a TV debate which took place in the last presidential election campaign in Romania (2009). The confrontation involved Traian Bǎsescu (TB), the President in office, running for a second term, and Crin Antonescu (CA), the president of the National Liberal Party. The differences in their strategic use of certainty and uncertainty marks define two types of ethos for the audience: an ethos of power (TB) vs. an ethos of a man of character (CA).
References
Aikhenwald, Alexandra Y
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Amossy, Ruth
2006 L’argumentation dans le discours,
[Argumentation in Discourse] 2nd ed. Paris: Armand Colin.

Anderson, Lloyd B
1986 “Evidentials, Pathos of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In
Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by
Wallace L. Chafe, and
Johanna Nichols, 273-312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.

Charaudeau, Patrick
2005
Le discours politique
.
Les masques du pouvoir. [Political Discourse. The Masks of Power]. Paris: Vuibert.

Cornillie, Bert, and Paola Pietrandrea
2012 “
Modality at Work. Cognitive, Interactional and Textual Functions of Modal Markers.”
Journal of Pragmatics 441: 2109-2115.


Czerwionka, Lori
2012 “Mitigation: The Combined Effects of Imposition and Certitude.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1163-1182.


Fetzer, Anita
2008 “‘
And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It.’ The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 384-396.


Gramatica limbii române [The Grammar of Romanian], II, Enunţul [Utterance]
2005 Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.

Kiefer, Ferenc
1998 “Modality.” In
Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by
Jacob L. Mey, 591-597. Amsterdam, etc.: Elsevier.

Palmer, Frank
1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rocci, Andrea
2012 “Modality and Argumentative Discourse Relations: A Study of the Italian Necessity Modal Dovere.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 2129-2149.


Rossari, Corinne
2012 “The Evidential Meaning of Modal Parentheticals.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 2183-2193.


Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2000 “The Functions of I Think in Political Discourse.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 101: 41-63.


Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter R. R. White, and Karin Aijmer
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 639-656.


Squartini, Mario
2012 “Evidentiality in Interaction: The Concessive Use of the Italian Future between Grammar and Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 2116-2126.


Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Jiang, Xiaoming & Marc D. Pell
2017.
The sound of confidence and doubt.
Speech Communication 88
► pp. 106 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.