Formulations are turns of talk that address both interlocutors’ perspectives (in previous turns) and participation (in subsequent turns). This paper examines formulations in interactions, taking place during classroom workshops held with children aged 10–13 and coordinated by facilitators. The analysis shows the ways in which facilitators’ formulations combine reference to the children’s previous statements with the projection of children’s positioning, thus creating different opportunities for children’s active participation and dialogic forms of communication. In the context taken into consideration, formulations can have five different functions: revoicing; promoting assessments of children’s performances; promoting diverging opinions about controversial issues; supporting children’s expressions of emotional experiences and rapport; concluding interactions by asserting shared values (upshot formulations). The analysis reveals that, in achieving different functions, formulations can take different forms, displaying and enhancing different forms of expectations and positioning, with different consequences on dialogic forms of communication.
2005“Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.”Discourse Studies 7 (6): 627–647.
2008“Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Asmuss, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
2009“Meeting Talk. An Introduction.”Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22.
2012a>“Participation, Facilitation and Mediation in Educational Interactions.” In Participation, Facilitation, and Mediation. Children and Young People in their Social Contexts, ed. by Claudio Baraldi and Vittorio Iervese, 66–86. London-New York: Routledge.
2007“Formulation and the Facilitation of Agreement in Meetings Talk.”Text & Talk 27 (3): 273–296.
Beach, Wayne, and C.N. Dixson
2001“Revealing Moments: Formulating Understandings of Adverse Experiences in a Health Appraisal Interview.”Social Science and Medicine 521: 25–44.
2010“Articulating the Unsaid via And-Prefaced Formulations of Other’s Talk.”Discourse Studies 12 (1): 5–32.
2006“A Conversation Analytical Approach to Business Communication. The Case of Leadership.”Journal of Business Communication 43 (3): 202–219.
2009“Beyond Taxonomies of Influence. ‘Doing’ Influence and Making Decisions in Management Team Meetings.”Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 57–79.
2011“Notionalization: The Transformation of Descriptions in Categorizations.”Human Studies 341: 155–181.
2003“Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, J. Mandelbaum, 293–308. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Britten, Nancy
2004“Formulation in General Practice Consultation.”Text 24 (2): 147–170.
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Nancy Britten
2007“Patient Participation in Formulating and Opening Sequences.” In Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations: Qualitative Perspectives, ed. by Sarah Collins, Nancy Britten, Joanna Ruusuvuori, and Andrew Thompson, 104–120. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
1984The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove
(eds)1999Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
2009Building and Restoring Respectful Relationships in Schools. London/New York: Routledge.
1985“Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun Van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John, and Rod D. Watson
1979“Formulations as Conversational Objects”. In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.
Heritage, John, and Rod D. Watson
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed”. Semiotica 30 (3/4): 245–262.
Hill, Malcolm, John Davis, Prout Alan, and Key Tisdall
2004“Moving the Participation Agenda Forward.”Children & Society 181: 77–96.
2005“Active Listening: Formulations and the Elicitation of Feelings-Talk in Child Counselling.”Research on language and Social Interaction 38 (3): 303–329.
1996“Shifting Participant Frameworks: Orchestrating Thinking Practices in Group Discussion.” In Discourse, Learning, and Schooling, ed. by Deborah Hicks, 63–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Percy-Smith, Barry, and Nigel Thomas
(eds)2010A Handbook of Children’s and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.
1951Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2004The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell: Oxford.
2005“Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.”Language Teaching 38 (4): 165–187.
2007“Interaction and Constructs”. In Language Learning and Teaching as Social Inter-action, ed. by Zhu Hua, Paul Seedhouse, and Vivian Cook, 9–21. Houndmills: Palgrave.
2008“How Can Teacher Talk Support Learning?”Linguistics and Education 191: 132–148.
Sinclair, John, and Michael Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse. The English used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sparks, Lisa, and Melinda Villagran
2010Patient and Provider Interaction. A Global Health Communication Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2008“Exploring Leadership Conversations.”Management Communication Quarterly 21 (4): 529–536.
van der Houwen, Fleur
2009“Formulating Disputes.”Journal of Pragmatics 411: 2072–2085.
2011Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. New York/London: Routledge.
Cited by 12 other publications
Amri, Marwa & Olcay Sert
2022. Establishing understanding during student-initiated between-desk instructions in project work. Cambridge Journal of Education 52:6 ► pp. 667 ff.
2019. Practices/1, Italy: Facilitating Participation in Early Childhood Education. In Children’s Self-determination in the Context of Early Childhood Education and Services [International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, 25], ► pp. 23 ff.
2021. Studying Hybrid Identities in Schools: Notes on a European Project. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny 47:4 (182) ► pp. 25 ff.
2022. Ways of Facilitating Children’ Agency. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 115 ff.
2022. Researching Agency and Interaction: Methodological Considerations. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 95 ff.
2022. Facilitation in the Education System. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 67 ff.
2023. Structural variations of classroom interaction: implications for the education system. International Studies in Sociology of Education 32:3 ► pp. 740 ff.
2023. Facilitation of adolescents' agency and hybrid integration. Children & Society
Farini, Federico & Angela Scollan
2023. What Is Facilitation?. In Pedagogical Innovation for Children's Agency in the Classroom, ► pp. 61 ff.
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees de Glopper
2021. Text formulations as practices of demonstrating understanding in dialogic reading. Text & Talk 41:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
Solem, Marit Skarbø & Karianne Skovholt
2019. Teacher Formulations in Classroom Interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.