Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.234–260

Formulations in dialogic facilitation of classroom interactions

| Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia

Formulations are turns of talk that address both interlocutors’ perspectives (in previous turns) and participation (in subsequent turns). This paper examines formulations in interactions, taking place during classroom workshops held with children aged 10–13 and coordinated by facilitators. The analysis shows the ways in which facilitators’ formulations combine reference to the children’s previous statements with the projection of children’s positioning, thus creating different opportunities for children’s active participation and dialogic forms of communication. In the context taken into consideration, formulations can have five different functions: revoicing; promoting assessments of children’s performances; promoting diverging opinions about controversial issues; supporting children’s expressions of emotional experiences and rapport; concluding interactions by asserting shared values (upshot formulations). The analysis reveals that, in achieving different functions, formulations can take different forms, displaying and enhancing different forms of expectations and positioning, with different consequences on dialogic forms of communication.

Keywords: agency, children, expectations, facilitation, education, formulations, positioning
Published online: 15 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.04bar
References
Antaki Charles, Rebecca Barnes, and Ivan Leudar
2005 “Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 7 (6): 627–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles
2008 “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuss, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
2009 “Meeting Talk. An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio
(ed) 2009 Dialogue in Intercultural Communities. From an Educational point of View. Amsterdam:John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio.
2012a >“Participation, Facilitation and Mediation in Educational Interactions.” In Participation, Facilitation, and Mediation. Children and Young People in their Social Contexts, ed. by Claudio Baraldi and Vittorio Iervese, 66–86. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio
2012b “The Function of Formulations in Polyphonic Dialogue.” In Spces of Polyphony, ed. by Ubaldina Lorda and Peter Zabalbeascoa, 73–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio, and Federico Farini
2011 “Dialogic Mediation in International Groups of Adolescents.” Language and Dialogue 1(2): 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Rebecca
2007 “Formulation and the Facilitation of Agreement in Meetings Talk.” Text & Talk 27 (3): 273–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne, and C.N. Dixson
2001 “Revealing Moments: Formulating Understandings of Adverse Experiences in a Health Appraisal Interview.” Social Science and Medicine 521: 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2010 “Articulating the Unsaid via And-Prefaced Formulations of Other’s Talk.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Jonathan
2006 “A Conversation Analytical Approach to Business Communication. The Case of Leadership.” Journal of Business Communication 43 (3): 202–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Beyond Taxonomies of Influence. ‘Doing’ Influence and Making Decisions in Management Team Meetings.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 57–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppelmann, Arnulf
2011 “Notionalization: The Transformation of Descriptions in Categorizations.” Human Studies 341: 155–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2003 “Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, J. Mandelbaum, 293–308. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Britten, Nancy
2004 “Formulation in General Practice Consultation.” Text 24 (2): 147–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gafaranga, Joseph, and Nancy Britten
2007 “Patient Participation in Formulating and Opening Sequences.” In Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations: Qualitative Perspectives, ed. by Sarah Collins, Nancy Britten, Joanna Ruusuvuori, and Andrew Thompson, 104–120. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2001 When Listeners Talk. Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
1984 The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove
(eds) 1999 Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hendry, Richard
2009 Building and Restoring Respectful Relationships in Schools. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heritage John
1985 “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun Van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010 Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rod D. Watson
1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects”. In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed”. Semiotica 30 (3/4): 245–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Malcolm, John Davis, Prout Alan, and Key Tisdall
2004 “Moving the Participation Agenda Forward.” Children & Society 181: 77–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2005 “Active Listening: Formulations and the Elicitation of Feelings-Talk in Child Counselling.” Research on language and Social Interaction 38 (3): 303–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Allison
2009 “Agency”. In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies, ed. by Jens Qvortrup, William Corsaro, and Michael-Sebastian Honig, 34–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
James, Allison, Chris Jenks, and Alan Prout
1998 Theorizing Childhood. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
1984 Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
McHoul, Alexander
1990 “The Organization of Repair in Classroom Talk.” Language in society 191: 349–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead Nicola, and Peter Bower
2000 “Patient Centredness: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Empirical Literature.” Social Science & Medicine 511: 1087–1110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mearns, Dave, and Brian Thorne
1999 Person-centred Counselling in Action. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979 Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Neil
2002 “Developing Dialogues.” In Learning for Life in the 21st Century, ed. by Gordon Wells, and Guy Claxton, 141–153. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Neil, and Karen Littleton
2007 Dialogue and Development of Children’s Thinking. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, Naomi Knight, and Ashley Watkins
2012 “Working to Keep Aligned in Psychotherapy: Using Nods as Dialogic Resource to Display Affiliation.” Language and Dialogue 2 (1): 9–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Catherine, and Sarah Michaels
1996 “Shifting Participant Frameworks: Orchestrating Thinking Practices in Group Discussion.” In Discourse, Learning, and Schooling, ed. by Deborah Hicks, 63–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percy-Smith, Barry, and Nigel Thomas
(eds) 2010 A Handbook of Children’s and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, Carl
1951 Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul
2004 The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
2005 “Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.” Language Teaching 38 (4): 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Interaction and Constructs”. In Language Learning and Teaching as Social Inter-action, ed. by Zhu Hua, Paul Seedhouse, and Vivian Cook, 9–21. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Tina
2008 “How Can Teacher Talk Support Learning?” Linguistics and Education 191: 132–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John, and Michael Coulthard
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse. The English used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sparks, Lisa, and Melinda Villagran
2010 Patient and Provider Interaction. A Global Health Communication Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
2008 “Exploring Leadership Conversations.” Management Communication Quarterly 21 (4): 529–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Houwen, Fleur
2009 “Formulating Disputes.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 2072–2085. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Steven
2011 Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Amri, Marwa & Olcay Sert
2022. Establishing understanding during student-initiated between-desk instructions in project work. Cambridge Journal of Education 52:6 ► pp. 667 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2019. Practices/1, Italy: Facilitating Participation in Early Childhood Education. In Children’s Self-determination in the Context of Early Childhood Education and Services [International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, 25], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2019. Using formulations to manage conflicts in classroom interactions. Language and Dialogue 9:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2021. Studying Hybrid Identities in Schools: Notes on a European Project. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny 47:4 (182) ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2022. Ways of Facilitating Children’ Agency. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2022. Researching Agency and Interaction: Methodological Considerations. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2022. Facilitation in the Education System. In Facilitating Children's Agency in the Interaction [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2023. Structural variations of classroom interaction: implications for the education system. International Studies in Sociology of Education 32:3 ► pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Baraldi, Claudio
2024. Facilitation of adolescents' agency and hybrid integration. Children & Society 38:2 ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Farini, Federico & Angela Scollan
2023. What Is Facilitation?. In Pedagogical Innovation for Children's Agency in the Classroom, ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees de Glopper
2021. Text formulations as practices of demonstrating understanding in dialogic reading. Text & Talk 41:4 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Solem, Marit Skarbø & Karianne Skovholt
2019. Teacher Formulations in Classroom Interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.