Article published in:
Constructing and Negotiating Identity in Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 5:1] 2015
► pp. 90106
References
Amossy, Ruth
1991Les idées reçues. Sémiologie du stéréotype. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mihail
1968Rabelais and his World (translated by H. Iswolsky). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick
2006 “Des catégories pour l’humour ?”. Questions de communication 101: 19–41. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulomb-Gully, Marlène
1997 “Bébête Show et Guignols de l’Info : de l’émission à la réception, parcours comiques et portraits de rieurs.” Réseaux 841: 139–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Petite Généalogie de la satire politique télévisuelle. L’exemple des Guignols de l’Info et du Bébête Show.” Hermès 1 (29): 33–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Waddick
2013 “No strings attached ? Les Guignols de l’info and French Television.” In News Parody and Political Satire across the Globe, ed. by Geoffrey Baym, and Jeffrey P. Jones, 39–50. New York: Routhledge.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1985La guerre du faux. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, and Amolda Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2002Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah/New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Manuel, and María Dolorès Vivero García
2006 “L’humour dans la chronique de la presse quotidienne.” Questions de communication 101: 81–101. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E., and Mark A. Ferguson
2004 “Social Consequences of Disparagement Humour. A Prejudiced Norm Theory.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (1): 79–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foxman, Abraham H
2010Jews and Money: The Story of a Stereotype. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hecker, Marc
2004La presse française et la première guerre du golfe. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Hodson, Gordon, Jonathan Rush, and Cara C. MacInnis
2010 “A Joke is Just a Joke (Except When It Isn’t): Cavalier Humour Beliefs Facilitate the Expression of Group Dominance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 (4): 660–682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kleg, Milton
1993Hate Prejudice and Racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde
2011 “The Politics of Humour in the Public Sphere: Cartoons, Power and Modernity in the First Transnational Humour Scandal.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 141: 63–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macé, Eric
1992 “La télévision du pauvre. Sociologie du «public participant» : une relation «enchantée» à la télévision.” Hermès 1 (11–12): 159–175.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Mike
1988On Humour: Its Nature and Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Popa, Diana E
2013 “Televised Political Satire”. In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theories, ed. by Marta Dynel, 367–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Rieusset-Lemarié, Isabelle
1994 “Stéréotype ou reproduction de langage sans sujet”. In Le Stéréotype. Crise et transformations, ed. by Alain Goulet, 15–34. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosello, Mireille
2003“Globalization or ‘Guignolisation’: Derision and Liberalism.” French Cultural Studies 141: 139–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timmerman, David M., Grant F. Gussman, and Daniel King
2012 “Humour, Race and Rhetoric: A Liberating Sabotage of the Past’s Hold on the Present.” Rhetoric Review 31 (2): 169–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy, and Diana Elena Popa
(eds) 2011Studies in Political Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar