Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructing and Negotiating Identity in Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 5:1] 2015
► pp. 90–106

From hostile humour to stereotyping in televised satire Les Guignols de l’Info

Humour displayed by today’s media targets both individuals and communities and the degree to which it is perceived as a mere humoristic act or, more seriously, as an insult depends on a series of factors which point to: its creator (the goal he/she (c)overtly assumes to reach), its addressee (whether he/she is a witness or a target), and the context in which the act is performed (institutionalized vs non-institutionalized). This study takes into account several examples from the French show Les Guignols de l’Info in order to bring forth the language tools and discourse strategies by means of which the creators of the show build up a negative image of the Romanian people.
Keywords: political satire, transgressive humour, Guignols de l’Info, ethnic identity, Romanian
Published online: 23 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.05scr
References (24)
Amossy, Ruth. 1991. Les idées reçues. Sémiologie du stéréotype. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mihail. 1968. Rabelais and his World (translated by H. Iswolsky). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2006. “Des catégories pour l’humour ?”. Questions de communication 101: 19–41. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulomb-Gully, Marlène. 1997. “Bébête Show et Guignols de l’Info : de l’émission à la réception, parcours comiques et portraits de rieurs.” Réseaux 841: 139–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Petite Généalogie de la satire politique télévisuelle. L’exemple des Guignols de l’Info et du Bébête Show.” Hermès 1 (29): 33–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Waddick. 2013. “No strings attached ? Les Guignols de l’info and French Television.” In News Parody and Political Satire across the Globe, ed. by Geoffrey Baym, and Jeffrey P. Jones, 39–50. New York: Routhledge.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1985. La guerre du faux. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, and Amolda Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah/New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Manuel, and María Dolorès Vivero García. 2006. “L’humour dans la chronique de la presse quotidienne.” Questions de communication 101: 81–101. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E., and Mark A. Ferguson. 2004. “Social Consequences of Disparagement Humour. A Prejudiced Norm Theory.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (1): 79–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foxman, Abraham H. 2010. Jews and Money: The Story of a Stereotype. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hecker, Marc. 2004. La presse française et la première guerre du golfe. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Hodson, Gordon, Jonathan Rush, and Cara C. MacInnis. 2010. “A Joke is Just a Joke (Except When It Isn’t): Cavalier Humour Beliefs Facilitate the Expression of Group Dominance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 (4): 660–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleg, Milton. 1993. Hate Prejudice and Racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2011. “The Politics of Humour in the Public Sphere: Cartoons, Power and Modernity in the First Transnational Humour Scandal.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 141: 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macé, Eric. 1992. “La télévision du pauvre. Sociologie du «public participant» : une relation «enchantée» à la télévision.” Hermès 1 (11–12): 159–175.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Mike. 1988. On Humour: Its Nature and Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Popa, Diana E. 2013. “Televised Political Satire”. In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theories, ed. by Marta Dynel, 367–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Rieusset-Lemarié, Isabelle. 1994. “Stéréotype ou reproduction de langage sans sujet”. In Le Stéréotype. Crise et transformations, ed. by Alain Goulet, 15–34. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosello, Mireille. 2003. “Globalization or ‘Guignolisation’: Derision and Liberalism.” French Cultural Studies 141: 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timmerman, David M., Grant F. Gussman, and Daniel King. 2012. “Humour, Race and Rhetoric: A Liberating Sabotage of the Past’s Hold on the Present.” Rhetoric Review 31 (2): 169–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy, and Diana Elena Popa (eds). 2011. Studies in Political Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar