Article published in:
Constructing and Negotiating Identity in Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 5:1] 2015
► pp. 107–127

Building identity in humorous media interactions

| Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania

This article presents an analysis of conversational humour (Attardo 1994) occuring in two Romanian television shows with the purpose of demonstrating that journalists use humour to build their own identity in relation to their interlocutors and to their audience. The types of strategic moves identified in media situational humour are two-fold: one directed at a participant in the conversation, having the potential of biting; the other that is directed at an absent other (in this case, the audience), having the potential of bonding (Boxer and Cortes-Conde 1997, 275). A relational identity is developed among participants in conversational joking which can be identified and described in accordance with the communicative norms and expectations that are considered appropriate in the media context in which individuals interact.

Keywords: identity, bonding, audience., humorous media
Published online: 23 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.06mad
References
Archakis, Argiris, and Villy Tsakona
2012 The Narrative Construction of Identities in Critical Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barsoux, Jean-Louis
1993 Funny Business. Humour, Management and Business Culture. London: Casell.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard
1975 “Verbal Art as Performance.” American Anthropologist 771: 290–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana
2002 “Nagging: The Familial Conflict Arena.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 49–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortes-Conde
1997 “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display.” Journal of Pragmatics 271: 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna
2011 “Discourse and Identity”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 263–282. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Ann
1986 “Teasing: a Verbal Play in Two Mexicano Homes.” In Language Socialization Across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin, and Elinor Ochs, 182–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geyer, Naomi
2010 “Teasing and Ambivalent Face in Japanese Multi-Party Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2120–2130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruner, Charles R
1970 “The Effect of Humor in Dull and Interesting Informative Speeches.” Central States Speech Journal 211: 160–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart
2000 “Who Needs Identity?” In Identity: A Reader, ed. by Paul du Gay, Jessica Evans, and Peter Redman, 15–30. London: Sage and the Open University.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
1995 “Only Teasing!” New Zealand English Newsletter 91: 32–35.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., Deborah J. Terry, and Katherine M. White
1995 “A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 581: 255–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2006 “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
2002a “Having a Laugh at Work: How Humour Contributes to Workplace Culture.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1683–1710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002b “Humour as a Discursive Boundary Marker in Social Interaction.” In Us and Others. Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, ed. by Anna Duszak, 377–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde
2008 “The Sociology of Humour.” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 365–402. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1963 “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change.” Word 191: 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markiewicz, Dorothy
1974 “Effects of Humor on Persuasion.” Sociometry 37 (3): 407–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Gª de Paredes, Elena
2013 “Discursive Mechanisms of Informative Humour in Spanish Media.” In Irony and Humour. From Pragmatics to Discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and Maria Belén Alvarado Ortega, 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John C
2000 “Humor as a Double-edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication.” Communication Theory 10 (3): 310–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J
1988 On Humor: Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scheufele, Dietram A
1999 “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheufele, Dietram A., and David Tewksbury
2007 “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B
1986 “Teasing and Shaming in Kauli Children’s Interactions.” In Language Socialization Across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin, and Elinor Ochs, 165–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie
2009 “Constructing Leader Identities Through Teasing at Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1125–1138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke
2003 “A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity.” In Handbook of Self and Identity, ed. by Mark R. Leary, and June Price, 128–152. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1984 Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wanzer, Melissa B., Melanie Booth-Butterfield, and Steve Booth-Butterfield
1996 “Are Funny People more Popular: The Relationship of Humor Orientation, Loneliness, and Social Attraction.” Communication Quarterly 441: 42–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Craig
2010 “Laughing our Way to Peace or War: Humour and Peacebuilding” [online article]. Journal of Conflictology 1 (2). Campus for Peace, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. http://​www​.artnodes​.com​/index​.php​/journal​-ofconflictology​/article​/viewFile​/vol1iss2​-zelizer​/vol1iss2​-zelizer [Consulted: 28.07. 2014].Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H
1998 “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H., and D. Lawrence Wieder
1970 “Ethnomethodology and the Problem of Order: Comment on Denzin.” In Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, ed. by Jack D. Douglas, 285–298. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
SOURCE 1
2011, May 22 Apropo TV Vintage, Pro TV Channel. Cum să devii vedetă în 10 paşi [How to become a star in 10 steps] http://​apropotv​.protv​.ro​/video​-cum​-sa​-devii​-vedeta​-in​-10​-pasi​/43013 [consulted: 28.07.2014].Google Scholar
SOURCE 2
2008, October 16 Teo Show, Pro TV Channel. Prinţul Andrei Raţiu invitat la emisiunea lui Teo Trandafir. [Prince Andrew invited to Teo Trandafir show] https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=O4i4oP9didY [consulted: 28.07.2014].Google Scholar