Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.264–282

From mediatized political discourse to The Hobbit

The role of pragmatic markers in the construction of dialogues, stereotypes and literary style

 | Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary
The present paper argues that the analysis of the functional spectrum of pragmatic markers (PMs) serves as a heuristic tool for studying the interactional dynamics of dialogues in a variety of genres and discourse types, whether naturally-occurring, scripted or literary. By way of arguing my point I will discuss the results of three of my previous case studies aimed at exploring the role of PMs. The case studies, by virtue of the types of discourse they are based on (mediatised political interviews, dramatised/televised conversations and literary texts) reveal different patterns of dialogicity, and complement the analyses of spontaneous everyday conversations, the type of data most of the current PM research draws on. In the course of my analyses I also hope to illustrate that the cross-fertilization between dialogue analysis, PM research and literary pragmatics has a lot to offer to all three disciplines.
Keywords: dialogue analysis, genre analysis, mediatized political discourse, pragmatic markers, pragmalinguistic stereotypes, literary pragmatics
Published online: 3 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.2.04fur
References (50)
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2004. “A Model and a Methodology for the Study of Pragmatic Parkers: The Semantic Field of Expectation.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1781–1805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2010. “Ideologizing Ethnolectal German.” In Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics, ed. by Sally Johnson and Tommaso M. Milani, 182–202. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2004. The News Interview - Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drout, Michael D.C. 2004. “Tolkien’s Prose Style and its Literary and Rhetorical Effects.” Tolkien Studies 11: 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2014. “On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-party Interactions.” Brno Studies in English 40 (1): 27–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 61: 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2007a. “The Status of of course as a Discourse Marker.” [URL] accessed on 15 August, 2014.
. 2007b. The Pragmatic Marker -Discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of ‘well’ and ‘of course’. Debrecen: Debrecen University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “General Extenders in English and Hungarian.” In When Grammar Minds Language and Literature – Festschrift for Prof. Béla Korponay on the occasion of his 80th birthday, ed. by Andor József, Hollósy Béla, Laczkó Tibor, and Pelyvás Péter, 147–157. Debrecen: Debrecen University Press.Google Scholar
Furkó, Bálint Péter, and Abuczki, Ágnes 2014. “English Discourse Markers in Mediatised Political Interviews.” Brno Studies in English 40 (1): 45–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and D.L. Greatbatch. 1991. “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 93–137. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2007. Irish English: History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1988. “ Of course: a pragmatic particle in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 21: 49–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey. 2006. “ Arrah, like, you know: The Dynamics of Discourse Marking in ICE-Ireland.” <[URL]>, accessed on 15th August, 2014.
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadephia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda. 2007. “Argumentation in Political Talk Show Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1388–1419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Kent. 2001. Discourse Markers. <[URL]>, accessed on 15th August, 2014.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1994. “Responsive List Construction.” Language and Social Psychology 131: 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diane. 2006. “Discourse Markers in English: A Discourse-pragmatic View.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 43–59. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Moreno, Carolina P. Amador. 2005. “Discourse Markers in Irish English: An Example from Literature.” In The Pragmatics of Irish English, ed. by Anne Barron and Klaus P. Schneider, 73–100. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moynahan, Julian. 1995. Anglo-Irish: The Literary Imagination in a Hyphenated Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, and Joanne Winter. 2002. “Affiliation in Adolescents’ Use of Discourse Extenders.” Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society . <[URL]>, accessed on 15th August, 2014.
Nuckolls, Janice. 1993. “The Semantics of Certainty in Quechua and its Implications for a Cultural Epistemology.” Language in Society 221: 235–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight and stuff like that. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike. 2010. “Methods in Discourse Variation Analysis: Reflections on the Way Forward.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (5): 581–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quaglio, Paulo. 2009. Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reid, Robin Anne. 2009. “Mythology and History: A Stylistic Analysis of The Lord of the Rings. .” Style 43 (4): 517–538.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Güntner, and Julia Schlüter. 2009. One Language, Two Grammars? – Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1972. “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 75–119. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1999. “Discourse Markers.” Lingua 1071: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shippey, Tom. 2000. J.R.R. Tolkien: Author of the Century. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 1988. “What really Really Means in Casual Conversation and in Political Interviews.” Linguistica Antverpiensia 221: 206–225.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, and Karin Aijmer,. 2002/03. “The Expectation Marker of course.” Languages in Contrast 41: 13–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, P.R.R. White, and Karin Aijmer. 2007. “Presupposition and ‘Taking-for-granted’ in Mass Communicated Political Argument: An Illustration from British, Flemish and Swedish Political Colloquy.” In Political Discourse in the Media, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Gerda E. Lauerbach, 31–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Ross. 2007. Inside Language - Linguistic and Aesthetic Theory in Tolkien. Zollikofen, Switzerland: Walking Tree Publishers.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Culturally Speaking. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stimpson, Catherine. 1969. J.R.R. Tolkien. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbe, Maria, and Janet Holmes. 1995. “ You know, eh and Other Exasperating Expressions: An Analysis of Social and Stylistic Variation in the Use of Pragmatic Devices in a Sample of New Zealand English.” Language and Communication 151: 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue – The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Words Between Reality and Fiction.” Plenary Lecture presented at Dialogue Analysis: Literature as Dialogue 14th conference of the International Association for Dialogue Analysis , Turku, Finland 2012.
Wichmann, Anne, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, and Karin Aijmer. 2010. “How Prosody Reflects Semantic Change: A Synchronic Case Study of of course .” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 103–155. Berlin and NY: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fu, Yanli
2024. A Comparative Analysis of the Use of the Discourse Marker “But” in a British Televised Political Interview Show: A Socio-Pragmatic Perspective. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities DOI logo
Fu, Yanli, Muhammad Afzaal & Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs
2024. Investigating discourse markers “you know” and “I mean” in mediatized English political interviews: a corpus-based comparative study. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Fu, Yanli & Victor Ho
2022. Discourse markers in TV interviews: A corpus-based comparative study of Chinese and the western media. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.