Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.312–333

Linguistic alignment in L1–L2 dialogue

| University of Bern,
The aim of this paper is to investigate alignment in L1–L2 dialogue. More specifically, I examine to what extent alignment in L1–L2 is different from alignment in L1–L1 dialogue. I investigate different variables that may affect linguistic alignment in the course of L1–L2 dialogue. As more variables, such as differences in language proficiency of interlocutors, affect the linguistic alignment in L1–L2 dialogue, it appears that linguistic alignment in L1–L2 dialogue is different from linguistic alignment in L1–L1 dialogue both quantitatively and quantitatively. I also discuss the mechanisms that permit lexical alignment during dialogue. This study interprets the alignment process in terms of the activation threshold hypothesis (Paradis 1993) and a link is made between the activation threshold hypothesis and Pickering and Garrods’ (2013) account that language production and language comprehension are interwoven. Based on Swiss multilingualism, language selection is proposed as the macro-linguistic alignment process.
Keywords: L2 speakers, L1–L2 dialogue, dialogue, linguistic alignment, lexical alignment, interlocutors, macro-linguistic alignment
Published online: 3 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.2.07pur
References (66)
Bavelas, Janet B., Alex Black, Charles R. Lemery, and Jennifer Mullett. 1986. I Show How You Feel: Motor Mimicry as a Communicative Act.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 322–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B., Linda Coates, and Trudy Johnson. 2000. “Listeners as co-narrators.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 791: 941–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernolet, Sarah, Robert J. Hartsuiker, and Martin J. Pickering. 2007. “Shared Syntactic Representations in Bilinguals: Evidence for the Role of Word-Order Repetition.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 331: 931–949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo. 1999. “Ultimate Attainment in L2 Pronunciation: The Case of Very Advanced Late L2 Learners.” In Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, ed. by David Birdsong, 133–159. Mahwah, New: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bortfeld, Heather, and Susan E. Brennan. 1997. “Use and Acquisition of Idiomatic Expressions in Referring by Native and Non-native Speakers.” Discourse Processes 231: 119–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Holly P. 2007. “Syntactic Priming”. Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (1-2): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Jamie Pearson, Janet F. McLean, and Ash Brown. 2011. “The Role of Beliefs in Lexical Alignment: Evidence from Dialogs with Humans and Computers.” Cognition 1211: 41–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Jamie Pearson, and Janet F. McLean. 2010. “Linguistic Alignment between People and Computers.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2355–2368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Janet F. McLean, and Alexandra A. Cleland. 2007. “Syntactic Alignment and Participant Role in Dialogue.” Cognition 104 (2): 163–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, and Alexandra A. Cleland. 2000. “Syntactic Coordination in Dialogue.” Cognition 751: B13–B25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan E., and Herbert H. Clark. 1996. “Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 221: 1482–1493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Yuko G., and Kenji Hakuta. 2004. “Bilingualism and Second Language Acquisition.” In The Handbook of Bilingualism, ed. by Tej K. Bhatia and William C. Ritchie, 114–144. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 2002. “Background to the L2 User.” In Portraits of the L2 User, ed. by Vivian Cook, 1–28. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabaroglu, Nese, Suleyman Basaran, and Jon Roberts. 2010. “A Comparison between the Occurrence of Pause, Repetitions and Recasts under Conditions of Face-to-face- and Computermediated Communication: A Preliminary Study.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. April. 9 (2).Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Edward F. Schaefer. 1989. “Contributing to Discourse.” Cognitive Science 131: 259–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. “Referring as a Collaborative Process.” Cognition 221: 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Catherine R. Marshall. 1981. “Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge.” In Elements of discourse understanding, ed. by Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber, and Ivan Sag, 10–63. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L. 2008. “A New Look at Common Ground: Memory, Egocentrism, and Joint Action.” In Intention, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 151–188. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Condon, William S., and William D. Ogston. 1966. “Sound Film Analysis of Normal and Pathological Behavior Patterns.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1431: 338–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, Albert., Martin J. Pickering, and Antonella Sorace. 2008. “Alignment in Second Language Dialogue.” Language and Cognitive Processes 23 (4): 528–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fussell, Susan R., and Robert M. Krauss. 1992. “Coordination of Knowledge in Communication: Effects of Speakers’ Assumptions about What Others Know.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 621: 378–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon C., and Anthony Anderson. 1987. “Saying What You Mean in Dialogue: A Study in Conceptual and Semantic Co-ordination.” Cognition 27 (2): 181–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon, and Martin J. Pickering. 2009. “Joint Action, Interactive Alignment, and Dialogue.” Topics in Cognitive Science 11:292–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. “Alignment in Dialogue.” In Oxford Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Gareth Gaskell, 443–451. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Automaticity in Language Production in Monologue and Dialogue.” In Automaticity and Control in Language Processing, ed. by Antje S. Meyer, Linda R. Wheeldon, and Andrea Krott, 1–21. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Why Is Conversation So Easy?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 81: 8–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, Susan M. 2003. “Input and Interaction.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Catherine J. Doughty and Michael H. Long, 224–255. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gil, José Maria. 2011. “Relevance Theory and Unintended Transmission of Information.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (1): 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland, and Justine Coupland. 1991. “Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context, and Consequence.” In Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, ed. by Howard Giles, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland, 1–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. “Syntactic Priming: a Corpus-based Approach.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 341: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, Robert J., Martin J. Pickering, and Eline Veltkamp. 2004. “Is Syntax Separate or Shared between Languages? Cross-linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish/English Bilinguals.” Psychological Science 151: 409–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horton, William S. 2008. “A Memory-based Approach to Common Ground and Audience Design.” In Intention, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 189–222. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2005. “Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-terrorism (New Approaches to Conflict Analysis).” Manchester University Press.
Jucks, Regina, Becker Maria Bettina, and Rainer Bromme. 2008. “Lexical Entrainment in Written Discourse: Is Expert’s Word Use Adapted to the Addressee?” Discourse Processes 451: 497–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawanani, Sachiyo, and Kawanani Kazuya. 2009. “Evaluation of World Englishes among Japanese Junior and Senior High school Students.” Second Language Studies 27 (2): 1–69.Google Scholar
Kolde, Gottfried. 1981. “Sprachkontakte in gemischtsprachigen Städten. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über Voraussetzungen und Formen sprachlicher Interaktion verschiedensprachiger Jugendlicher in den Schweizer Städten Biel/Bienne und Fribourg/ Friburg i.Ue.” Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beihefte H.37. [Language contacts in mixed-language towns. Comparative studies on conditions and voice interaction forms different language of young people in the Swiss cities of Biel / Bienne and Fribourg / Friburg i.Ue. Journal of dialectology and linguistics, supplements H.37]Google Scholar
Krauss, Robert M., and Jennifer S. Pardo. 2004. “Is Alignment Always the Result of Priming?” Behavioural and Brain Science 271: 203–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Judith F., Susan C. Bobb, Maya Misra, and Taomei Gue. 2008. “Language Selection in Bilingual Speech: Evidence for Inhibitory Process.” Acta Psychologica 1281: 416–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Danielle H., and Peter Brusilovsky. 2009. “Reinforcing Recommendation Using Implicit Negative Feedback.” In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. by Geert Jan Houben, Gord McCalla, Fabio Pianesi, and Massimo Zancanaro, 422–427. Vol. 55351. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, William J.M. 1989. Speaking from Intention to Articulation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Levelt, William J.M., and Stephanie Kelter. 1982. “Surface Form and Memory in Question Answering.” Cognitive Psychology 141: 78–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdi, Georges. 2007. “The Swiss Model of Plurilingual Communication.” In Receptive Multilingualism. Linguistic Analyses, Language Policies and Didactic Concepts, ed. by Jan D. Ten Thije and Ludger Zeevaert, 159–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, Roy, and Leila Ranta. 1997. “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 201: 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehler, Alexander, Andy Lücking, and Peter Menke. 2011. “ Modelling Lexical Alignment in Spontaneous Direction Dialogue Data by Means of a Lexicon Network Model .” In Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing) .
Menenti, Laura, Martin J. Pickering, and Simon Garrod. 2012. “Toward a Neural Basis of Interactive Alignment in Conversation.” Frontiers in human neuroscience 6 (185): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2008. “Impeach or Exorcise?” or, What’s in the (Common) Ground.” In Intention, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 254–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ni Eochaidh, Ciara. 2010. The Role of Conceptual and Word Form Representations in Lexical Alignment: Evidence from Bilingual Dialogue. (Masters’ thesis). Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Paradis, Michel. 2004. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Bilingualism.” In Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Annette M.B. De Groot and Judith F. Kroll, 331–354. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Linguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Neurolinguistic Aspects of Interference in Bilingual Speakers: The Activation Threshold Hypotheses.” International Journal of Psycholinguistics: 133–145.Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., and Simon Garrod. 2013. “An Integrated Theory of Language Production and Comprehension.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4): 1–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication.” Research on Language and Computation 41: 203–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271: 169–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Daniel C., Rick Dale, and Natasha Z. Kirkham. 2007. “The Art of Conversation Is Coordination Common Ground and the Coupling of Eye Movements during Dialogue.” Psychological Science 18 (5): 403–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, Jennifer M., Rick Dale, and Gina M. Caucci. 2012. “Doubling up on Double Meanings: Pragmatic Alignment.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turn-taking in Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schenkein, Jim. (1980). “A Taxonomy for Repeating Action Sequences in Natural Conversation.” In Language production Vol. 1. Speech and talk. ed. by Brian Butterworth, 21–47. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Niels O., and Jan Peter de Ruiter. 2004. “Some Notes on Priming, Alignment, and Selfmonitoring.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271: 208–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schober, Michael F., and Herbert H. Clark. 1989. “Understanding by Addressees and Overhearers.” Cognitive Psychology 211: 211–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert A. 1974. “Pragmatic Presuppositions.” In Semantics and Philosophy, ed. by Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Ungerer, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2009. Language as Dialogue: From Roles to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werlen, Iwar. 2007. “Receptive Multilingualism in Switzerland and the Case of Biel/Bienne.” In Receptive Multilingualism. Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic concepts, ed. by Jan D. Ten Thije and Ludger Zeevaert, 137–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jung, YeonJoo & Scott Crossley
2024. Stylistic alignment in natural conversation involving second language speakers. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Di & Janet Nicol
2022. Lexical alignment in second language communication: evidence from a picture-naming task. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 37:6 ► pp. 732 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.