Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 5:3 (2015) ► pp.381–407

Humour at work

| Transilvania University of Braxov

The paper starts from the assumption that organisational culture, a type of behaviour considered acceptable by employees (Hofstede and Hofstede 2004), is not pre-extant but is jointly created during the interactions of the people working together. This paper is part of a longer study that has analysed institutional talk in a multinational company based in Romania by looking at different aspects of interaction such as types of questions, modality, mitigation, politeness and frames. The paper tries to identify the uses and functions of humour in the exchanges between the team leader and the team members in this multinational company.

Keywords: humour, length and type (individual or collaborative) of humorous exchange, function
Published online: 17 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.02che
References
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “Script Theory Revisited: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model”. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 3-41: 293–347.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
2002 “Humour and Irony in Interaction From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection”. In Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, Vol. 31, ed. by Luigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri, and Giuseppe Riva, 166–186. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
2002a “Translation and Humour: An Approach Based on the General Theory of Verbal Humour (GTVH)”. The Translator 8 (2). Special Issue. Translating Humour: 173–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, Arthur Asa
1993 An Anatomy of Humor. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chefneux, Gabriela
2009 “Modality in Institutional Talk”. In Intercultural Communication in Multinational Companies, ed. by Liliana Coposescu, 47–60. Brașov: Editura Universității Transilvania din Brașov.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L., and Jennifer O’Brien
2000 “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement can do, Irony can do Better”. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (11): 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coposescu, Liliana, and Silviu Coposescu
2009 “Humour at Work”. In Intercultural Communication in Multinational Companies, ed. by Liliana Coposescu, 83–102. Brașov: Editura Universității Transilvania din Brașov.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diane Slade
2006 Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre
1976 Les jeux de mots. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise
2009 Professional Discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2000 “Functions of Humour in the Conversation of Men and Women.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 709–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Brooks L., and R. Kennan William
1979 “Mythmaking as Social Process: Directions for Myth Analysis and Cross Cultural Communication Research”. In Intercultural Theory and Practice, ed. by William G.Davey, 44–66. Washington: SIETAR Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Hill, Brooks L., and Brandon Fitzgerald
2002 “Humour Reconsidered with Prospects for Interethnic Relations”. Intercultural Communication Studies 11 (4): 93–108.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert, and Geert-Jan Hofstede
2004 Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill USA.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2000 “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace”. Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
2004 “Relational Practice in the Workplace: Women’s Talk or Gendered Discourse.” Language in Society 331: 377–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2006 Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006a “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humour and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koestler, Arthur
1964 The Act of Creation. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2007 “Oral Genres of Humour: On the Dialectic of Genre Knowledge and Creative Authoring”. Pragmatics 17 (2): 263–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, Pedro
2012 “Ethnic Humour: What Do Portuguese People Laugh at?”. Electronic Journal of Folklore 501: 87–98. [URL], DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John C
2000 “Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication”. Communication Theory 10 (3): 310–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, Michael Joseph
1988 On Humour: Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mullany, Louise
2007 Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
1974 Le Comique du Discours. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1978 “Some Technical Considerations of a Dirty Joke.” In Studies in the Organisation of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jan Schenkein, 249–269. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Jeanine
2010 Linguistic Aspects of Verbal Humour in Stand-up Comedy. Dissertation. [URL] accessed on 10 April 2014.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1984 Conversational Style: Analysing Talk among Friends. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veal, Tony
2003 Metaphor and Metonymy: The Cognitive Trump-Cards of Linguistic Humour. [URL] accessed on May 15 2014.Google Scholar
Wilson, Christopher P
1979 Jokes. Form, content, use and function. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chang, Wei-Lin Melody & Valeria Sinkeviciute
2022. role of ‘familiarity’ in Mandarin Chinese speakers’ metapragmatic evaluations of Australian conversational humour. The European Journal of Humour Research 10:2 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Garcia, Angela Cora
2021. The types and functions of humor in the work of a United States Senator. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Stephen, Jane Simpson & Claire Hardy
2022. The Use of Humor in Employee-to-Employee Workplace Communication: A Systematic Review With Thematic Synthesis. International Journal of Business Communication ► pp. 232948842110699 ff. DOI logo
Tonelli, Maria José & Felipe Zambaldi
2019. HUMOR NA ACADEMIA E PESQUISAS SOBRE HUMOR. Revista de Administração de Empresas 59:2 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.