Review published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 5:3 (2015) ► pp.471484
References
Adger, David
2015a “Mythical Myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth .” Lingua 1581: 76–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “More misrepresentation: A response to Behme and Evans.” Lingua 1621: 160–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, Antti, Gatanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert, and Arne Zeschel
2010 “Cognitive Corpus Linguistics Five Points of Debate on Current Theory and Methodology.” Corpora 5 (1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behme, Christina, and Vyvyan Evans
2015 “Leaving the Myth Behind: A Reply to Adger.” Lingua 1621: 149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botha, Rudolf P.
1989Challenging Chomsky: The Generative Garden Game. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de
2001Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Trans. and ed. by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green
2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel
2012Language: The Cultural Tool. Profile Books.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy
1980The Language Makers. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1981The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1987The Language Machine. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1996Signs, Language, and Communication: Integrational and Segregational Approaches. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Mindboggling: Preliminaries to a Science of the Mind. London: Pantaneto.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
1996 “Concerning the Generative Paradigm.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(4): 471–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles
2011 “Review of W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2010. The Evolution of Language”. Language and Dialogue 1 (1): 147–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1979Generative Grammar and Linguistic Competence. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Moore, Terence, and Christine Carling
1982Understanding Language: Towards a Post- Chomskyan Linguistics. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky, and Cilene Rodrigues
2009 “Pirahã Exceptionality: A Reassessment.” Language 851: 355–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
2005The‘Language Instinct’ Debate. Revised edition. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916 [1983]Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Roy Harris. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH
1987 “The Nature of the Evidence.” In Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing, ed. John McH. Sinclair, 150–159. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
2004Trust the Text. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
2012The Mental Corpus: How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Talbot J.
2001 “Bruner and Condillac on Learning How to Talk.” In Jerome Bruner: Language, Culture and Self, ed. by D. Bakhurst and S. Shanker, 71–87. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang
2013 “Was there a Cat in the Garden? Knowledge between Discourse and the Monadic Self.” Language and Dialogue 3 (2): 273–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael
2007 “Review of Geoffrey Sampson, The “Language Instinct” Debate, Revised Edition.” Language in Society 36 (4): 622–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sampson, Geoffrey

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.