Article published in:
Writing in interaction
Edited by Lorenza Mondada
[Language and Dialogue 6:1] 2016
► pp. 153


Alamargot, Denis, Sylvie Plane, Eric Lambert, and David Chesnet
2010 “Using Eye and Pen Movements to Trace the Development of Writing Expertise: Case Studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th Grader, Graduate student, and Professional Writer.” Reading and Writing 23: 853–888 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asmuss, Birte, and Sae Oshima
2012 “Negotiation of Entitlement in Proposal Sequences.” Discourse Studies 14: 67–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Basso, Keith
1974 “The Ethnography of Writing.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman, and Joel Sherzer. 423–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
(ed) 2007Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
1988Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bellemin-Noël, Jean, and Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz
1972Le Texte et l’avant-texte: Les brouillons d’un poème de Milosz. [The text and the avant-texte: The drafts of a poem by Milosz] Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Bereiter, Carl, and Marlene Scardamalia
1987The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2008Grassroots Literacy: Writing, Identity and Voice in Central Africa. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Robert, and Lorenza Mondada
(eds) 2005Les processus de la rédaction collaborative, [The process of collaborative writing]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Jane Danielewicz
1990 “Properties of Spoken and Written Language”. In Comprehending Oral and Written Language. ed. by Rosalind Horowitz and S. Jay Samuels, 83–113. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cibulka, Paul
2013 “The Writing Hand: Some Interactional Workings of Writing Gestures in Japanese Conversation.” Gesture 13: 166–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, Paul Sambre and Dorien Van De Mieroop
This issue.
Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada
2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1700–1718. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppman, Jed, Daniel Ferrer, and Michael Groden
(eds) 2004Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
2006 “When Documents ‘Speak’: Documents, Language and Interaction.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 63–80. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Yayoi Uno
2007 “Calligraphy and musical gestures in the late works of Chou Wen-chung”. Contemporary Music Review, 26: 569–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fayol, Michel
1999 “From On-Line Management Problems to Strategies in Written Production.” In The Cognitive Demands of Writing: Processing Capacity and Working Memory Effects in Text Production, ed. by Mark Torrance and Gaynor Jeffery, 13–23. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Fenoglio, Irène
2010 “Conceptualisation linguistique: Du manuscrit au texte: Contribution à l’étude des spécificités de l’écriture scientifique.” [Linguistic conceptualization: From manuscript to tet: Contributions to the study of the specificities of scientific writing]. Item. http://​www​.item​.ens​.fr​/index​.php​?id​=577246.Google Scholar
Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes
1981 “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 32: 365–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gaulmyn, Marie-Madeleine de, Robert Bouchard, and Alain Rabatel
(eds) 2001Le processus rédactionnel: Écrire à plusieurs voix., [The writing process: Writing together] Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Gee, James
1996Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Stephen J.
2004 “The Primacy of Gesture: Phenomenology and the Art of Chinese Calligraphy.” Analecta Husserliana LXXXI: 175–186.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2000 “Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach.” In Handbook of Visual Analysis, ed. by Theo van Leeuwen, and Carey Jewitt, 157–182. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Ian Watt
1963 “The Consequences of Literacy.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 304–345 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, David, Christian Heath, Paul Luff, and Paul Campion
1995 “Conversation Analysis: Human–Computer Interaction and the General Practice Consultation.” In Perspectives on HCI: Diverse approaches, ed. by Andrew Monk, and G. Nigel Gilbert, 199–222. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Greiffenhagen, Christian
2014 “The Materiality of Mathematics: Presenting Mathematics at the Blackboard.” The British Journal of Sociology 65: 502–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth
2001 “La critique génétique, aujourd’hui et demain.” [Genetic critique, today and tomorrow]. L’Esprit Créateur 41: 9–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Keisanen, Tiina, Mondada, Lorenza, Nevile, Maurice
(eds.) 2014Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy
1986The Origin of Writing. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel
1972People Processing Organizations: An Exchange Approach.” American Sociological Review: 256–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Louis
1979 “La critique génétique: origine et perspectives.” [“Genetic critique: origins and perspectives”]. In Essais de critique génétique, [Essays in genetic critique], ed. by Louis Hay. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Hazel, Spencer, and Kristian Mortensen
2014 “Embodying the Institution: Object Manipulation in Developing Interaction in Study Counselling Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 10–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian
1982 “Preserving the Consultation: Medical Record Cards and Professional Conduct.” Sociology of Health and Illness 4: 56–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
1996 “Documents and Professional Practice: ‘Bad’ Organisational Reasons for ‘Good’ Clinical Records.” Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 354–363. New York: ACM. Crossref
Heath, Christian, and Gillian Nicholls
1997 “Animated Texts: Selective Renditions of News Stories.” In Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Roger Säljö, 63–86. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2015 “New Frontiers in Interactive Multimodal Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgapoulou and Tereza Spilloti, 398–402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
2000Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz
2004 “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education 18: 220–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobs, Eva-Maria, and Daniel Perrin
(eds) 2014Handbook of Writing and Text Production. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, Teppo
This issue.
Jönsson, Linda, and Per Linell
1991Story Generations: From Dialogical Interviews to Written Reports in Police Interrogations. Text 11: 419–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kameo, Nahoko, and Jack Whalen
2015 “Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action.” Qualitative Sociology 38: 205–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karhu, Hanna
2012Säkeiden synty. Geneettinen tutkimus Otto Mannisen runokäsikirjoituksista. [The Genesis of Verses: A Genetic Analysis of Manuscripts of Otto Manninen]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Ronald T.
1996 “A model of Working Memory in Writing.” In The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michale Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 57–72. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin
1981The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Komter, Martha
2001 “La construction de la preuve dans un interrogatoire de police. [The construction of evidence in a police interrogation.]” Droit et société 48: 367–393.Google Scholar
2006 “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 201–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Career of a Suspect’s Statement: Talk, Text, Context.” Discourse Studies 14: 731–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene
2002 “A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions Which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1851–1877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies 5: 51–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen
2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2003Literacy in the New Media Age. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kunitz, Silvia
2015 “Scriptlines as Emergent Artifacts in Collaborative Group Planning.” Journal of Pragmatics 76: 135–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
1990 “Visualisation and Cognition: ‘Drawing Things Together’”. In Representation in Scientific Practice. ed. by Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 19–68. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2004The written language bias in linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luff, Paul, et al.
2007. “Augmented Paper: Developing Relationships Between Digital Content and Paper.” In The Disappearing Computer, Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments, ed. by Norbert Streitz, Achilles Kameas, and Irene Mavrommati, 275–297. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Moira Norrie, Beat Signer, and Peter Herdman
2004 “Only Touching the Surface: Creating Affinities between Digital Content and Paper.” In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 523–532. New York: ACM. Crossref
Luff, Paul, Karola Pitsch, Christian Heath, Peter Herdman, and Julian Wood
2010 “Swiping Paper: The Second Hand, Mundane Artifacts, Gesture and Collaboration.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14: 287–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael
1988 “The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences.” Human Studies 11: 201–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Ethnomethodology and History: Documents and the Production of History.” Ethnographic Studies 11: 87–106.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, and David Bogen
1996The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, Charles, Steve Graham and Jill Fitzgerald
(eds) 2005Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meehan, Albert J.
1986 “Record-Keeping Practices in the Policing of Juveniles.” Urban Life 15: 70–102.Google Scholar
Mikkola, Piia, and Esa Lehtinen
2014 “Initiating Activity Shifts Through Use of Appraisal Forms as Material Objects During Performance Appraisal Interviews.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 57–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2003 “Trajectoires d’objets de discours: Observer la science en train de se dire.” [Trajectories of discursive objects: observing science as emerging in talk]. Revue d’Etudes Romanes 54: 31–68.Google Scholar
2005a “ ‘Il faut d’abord ramasser les arguments’: La coordination de la parole-en-interaction et de l’inscription dans l’élaboration collective des topics.” [‘You have first to put together the arguments’: coordination of talk-in-interaction and of inscription within the collective elaboration of topics] In Les processus de la rédaction collaborative, [The process of collaborative writing] ed. by Robert Bouchard, and Lorenza Mondada, 131–164. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2005b “Visions controversées de la carte: construire le visible par les gestes et la parole en interaction.” In Espaces, savoirs et incertitudes. [Space, Knowledge, and Uncertainty], ed. by Elisabeth Remy, Valérie November, Cristina D’Alessandro-Scapari, and Florian Charvolin, 15–31. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
2006“Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence. Discourse Studies 8: 117–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls.” Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9.Google Scholar
2008b “Production du savoir et interactions multimodales: Une étude de la modélisation spatiale comme activité pratique située et incarnée.” [Knowledge production and multimodal interaction: A study of space modelling as a situated and embodied practice]. Revue d’Anthropologie des connaissances 2: 219–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008c “Documenter l’articulation des ressources multimodales dans le temps: La transcription d’enregistrements vidéos d’interactions.” [“Documenting the coordination of multimodal resources in time: Transcribing video recordings of interactions”]. In Donnees orales, les enjeux de la transcription, [Spoken data: transcription issues], ed. by Mireille Bilger, 127–155. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.Google Scholar
2010 “Methods for Reassembling Fragmented and Mobile Geographies.” In Mobile Methods, ed. by Monika Büscher, John Urry, and Katian Witchger, 138–163. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics 21: 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Video Analysis and the Temporality of Inscriptions within Social Interaction: The Case of Architects at Work.” Qualitative Research 12: 304–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Linguistic Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by Ralph Ludwig, Steve Pagel, and Peter Mühlhäusler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
This issue.
Monteiro, David
This issue.
Moore, Robert J., Jack Whalen, and E. Cabell Hankinson Gathman
2010 “The Work of the Work Order: Document Practice in Face-to-Face Service Encounters.” In Organisation, Interaction and Practice, ed. by Nick Llewellyn, and Jon Hindmarsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristian
2013 “Writing Aloud: Some Interactional Functions of the Public Display of Emergent Writing.” Participatory Innovation Conference 2013 Lahti, Finland , 119–125.
Murphy, Keith
2005 “Collaborative Imagining: The Interactive Use of Gestures, Talk, and Graphic Representation in Architectural Practice.” Semiotica 156: 113–145.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg
1990Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice
2004 “Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims about Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 447–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2014 “I’ll Just See What You Had Before: Making Computer Use Relevant While Patients Present Their Problems” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 79–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissi, Riikka
2015 “From Entry Proposals to a Joint Statement: Practices of Shared Text Production in Multiparty Meeting Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 79: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, Martin
2005“The Social and Historical Context of Writing Research. In Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 11–27. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.
1982Literacy and Orality. New York: Methuen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pälli, Pekka, and Esa Lehtinen
2014 “Making Objectives Common in Performance Appraisal Interviews.” Language & Communication 39: 92–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Innhwa
2012 “Asking Different Types of Polar Questions: The Interplay Between Turn, Sequence, and Context in Writing Conferences.” Discourse Studies 14: 613–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Requests: Knowledge and Entitlement in Writing Tutoring.” Language & Communication 43: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel
2013The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitsch, Karola
2006Sprache, Körper, Intermediäre Objekte: Zur Multimodalität der Interaktion im bilingualen Geschichtsunterricht. [“Language, the Body, and intermediary Objects: Multimodality of interaction in bilingual history lectures]. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
2007 “Unterrichtskommunikation Revisited: Tafelskizzen als interaktionale Ressource.” [“School communication revisited: Sketches on the blackboard as an interactional resource”] Bulletin VALS-ASLA 85: 59–80.Google Scholar
Poe, Edgar Allan
1846 “The Philosophy of Composition.” Graham’s Magazine 28: 163–167.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul and Julie Hengst
(eds) 2010Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice. Houndsmill: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Steven L. Thorne
2014 “Research Paradigms: Beyond Product, Process, and Social Activity.” In Handbook of Writing and Text Production, ed. by Jakobs, Eva-Maria, and Daniel Perrin, 31–54. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rauschenberg, Robert
1953Erased De Kooning Drawing. San Francisco: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Relieu Marc
2006 “Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées.” [“Some remarks about conversation analysis and mediated technologies.”] Revue française de linguistique appliquée [French Journal of Applied Linguistics] 11: 17–32.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Tanya Stivers
2001 “Achieving Activity Transitions in Physician-Patient Encounters.” Human Communication Research 27: 253–298.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Harold
1952 “The American Action Painters.” Art News 51: 22–23.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna
2001Looking Means Listening: Coordinating Displays of Engagement in Doctor-Patient Interaction.” Social Science & Medicine 52: 1093–1108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1998 “Body Torque.” Social Research 65: 535–586.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Reinhold
2001 “Die Tafel als Arbeitsinstrument und Statusrequisite.” [The blackboard as tool of work and indicator of status]. In Gesprächsforschung: Tendenzen und Perspektiven, [Discourse analysis: trends and perspectives], ed. by Zsuzsanna Iványi, and András Kertész, 221–242. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2013 “Constructing a Proposal as a Thought: A Way to Manage Problems in the Initiation of Joint Decision-Making in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Pragmatics 23: 519–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Werner Kallmeyer
2001 “Interaction by Inscription.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 465–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
2011 “The changing meaning of things: Found objects and inscriptions in social interaction.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Brian
1984Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Svensson, Hanna
2016 “Surveiller et corriger: L’accomplissement interactionnel de révisions d’inscriptions publiques.” [“To surveil and to correct. The interactional achievement of revisions of public inscriptions.”] In Participation et asymétries dans l’interaction institutionnelle [Participation and asymmetries in institutional interactions], ed. by Lorenza Mondada, and Sara Keel. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, Kimmo
2008“Palaute ongelmanratkaisuna: Opponentin tekstipalaute graduseminaarissa. [The Feedback Sequence as Problem-Solving: The Opponent’s Text Feedback in the Master’s Thesis Seminar.]” Kasvatus 39: 439–455.Google Scholar
2011 “Varovasti edeten ja taas perääntyen: Opponentin palautevuoron rakentuminen [Gently Forward, Then Back Again: Constructing Opponent Feedback].” Virittäjä 115.2 (2011).Google Scholar
This issue.
Svinhufvud, Kimmo, and Sanna Vehviläinen
2013 “Papers, Documents, and the Opening of an Academic Supervision Encounter.” Text & Talk 33: 139–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, Margaret H.
1999 “Re-Engaging and Dis-Engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society 28: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Producing Text through Talk: Question-Answering Activity in Classroom Peer Groups.” Linguistics and Education 13: 533–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, Steven L.
2012Gaming Writing: Supervernaculars, Stylization, and Semiotic Remediation. In Technology Across Writing Contexts and Tasks, ed. by Greg Kessler, Ana Oskoz, and Idoia Elola, 297–316. San Marcos: Calico.Google Scholar
Van Charldorp, Tessa
2011 “The Coordination of Talk and Typing in Police Interrogations.” Crossroads of Language, Interaction and Culture 8: 61–92.Google Scholar
2013 “The Intertwining of Talk and Technology: How Talk and Typing Are Combined in the Various Phases of the Police Interrogation.” Discourse & Communication 7: 221–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Galen, Gerard P.
1993 “Handwriting: A developmental Perspective.” In Motor Development in Early and Later Childhood: Longitudinal Approaches, ed. by Alex F. Kalverboer, Brian Hopkins, and Reint Geuze, 143–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna
2009a “Problems in the Research Problem: Critical Feedback and Resistance in Academic Supervision.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53: 185–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b “Student-Initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42: 163–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Question-Prefaced Advice in Feedback Sequences of Finnish Academic Supervisions.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 31–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2005Peer Tutoring in a Graduate Writing Centre: Identity, Expertise, and Advice Resisting.” Applied Linguistics 26: 141–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Complex Advice Acceptance as a Resource for Managing Asymmetries.” Text & Talk 27: 107–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod
2009Analysing Practical and Professional Texts: A Naturalistic Approach. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Weilenmann, Alexandra, and Gustav Lymer
2014 “Incidental and Essential Objects in Interaction.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 319–337. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Jack
1995a “Expert Systems Versus Systems for Experts.” In Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, ed. by Peter J. Thomas, 161–183. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1995b “A Technology of Order Production: Computer-Aided Dispatch in Public Safety Communications.” In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul Ten Have, and George Psathas, 187–230. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Whalen, Jack, and Erik Vinkhuyzen
2000 “Expert Systems in (Inter)action: Diagnosing Document Machine Problems over the Telephone.” In Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design, ed. by Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh, and Christian Heath, 92–140. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn, and Jack Whalen
2004 “Studying workscapes.” In Discourse and technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, ed. by Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon, 208–229. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman. Don
1992 “The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance.” In Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Abe, Makoto
2020. Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 49  pp. 100752 ff. Crossref logo
Aline, David & Yuri Hosoda
2021. Deployment of the formulaic utterance “how about∼” in task-based second language classroom discussions. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4  pp. 425 ff. Crossref logo
Balaman, Ufuk
2021. The Interactional Organization of Video‐Mediated Collaborative Writing: Focus on Repair Practices. TESOL Quarterly 55:3  pp. 979 ff. Crossref logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Jürgen Streeck
2018.  In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Dolata, Mateusz, Doris Agotai, Simon Schubiger & Gerhard Schwabe
2019. Pen-and-paper Rituals in Service Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3:CSCW  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Dolata, Mateusz & Gerhard Schwabe
2017. Paper Practices in Institutional Talk: How Financial Advisors Impress their Clients. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26:4-6  pp. 769 ff. Crossref logo
Fogarty-Bourget, Chloë G., Natasha Artemeva & Janna Fox
2019.  In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301],  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Hall, Joan Kelly & Emily Rine Butler
2017. The shifting role of a document in managing conflict and shaping the outcome of a small group meeting. Text & Talk 37:5 Crossref logo
Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole
2020. Conversational functions of ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’ in collaborative writing of primary school children. Classroom Discourse  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Jakonen, Teppo
2019. The integration of content and language in students’ task answer production in the bilingual classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22:4  pp. 428 ff. Crossref logo
Juvonen, Riitta, Marie Tanner, Christina Olin-Scheller, Liisa Tainio & Anna Slotte
2019. ‘Being stuck’. Analyzing text-planning activities in digitally rich upper secondary school classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21  pp. 196 ff. Crossref logo
Karvonen, Ulla, Liisa Tainio & Sara Routarinne
2018. Uncovering the pedagogical potential of texts: Curriculum materials in classroom interaction in first language and literature education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 17  pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
Kusters, Annelies, Massimiliano Spotti, Ruth Swanwick & Elina Tapio
2017. Beyond languages, beyond modalities: transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism 14:3  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Lefebvre, Augustin
2019.  In Reconceptualizing Connections between Language, Literacy and Learning [Educational Linguistics, 39],  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Lindholm, Camilla, Melisa Stevanovic, Taina Valkeapää & Elina Weiste
2020.  In Joint Decision Making in Mental Health,  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Magnusson, Simon
2021. Establishing jointness in proximal multiparty decision-making: The case of collaborative writing. Journal of Pragmatics 181  pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo
Mathieu, Corinne S., Nausica Marcos Miguel & Teppo Jakonen
2021. Introduction: classroom discourse at the intersection of language education and materiality. Classroom Discourse 12:1-2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:3  pp. 336 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Le défi de la multimodalité en interaction. Revue française de linguistique appliquée XXII:2  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2018. Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:1  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2019. Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 145  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Nguyen, Hanh thi
2017. The sequential organization of text and speech in multimodal synchronous computer-mediated communication. Text & Talk 37:1 Crossref logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2021. Interactional integration of talk and note-taking. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1  pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo
Nishizaka, Aug
2020. Appearance and Action: The Sequential Organization of Instructions in Japanese Calligraphy Lessons. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:3  pp. 295 ff. Crossref logo
Nissi, Riikka & Pekka Pälli
2020. Textual artefacts at the centre of sensemaking: The use of discursive-material resources in constructing joint understanding in organisational workshops. Discourse Studies 22:2  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Norén, Niklas, Helen Melander Bowden & Ann-Carita Evaldsson
2021. Young students’ treatment of synthetic voicing as an interactional resource in digital writing. Classroom Discourse  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Räisänen, Tiina
2018.  In Translanguaging as Everyday Practice [Multilingual Education, 28],  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Yagi, Junichi
2021. Enacting burikko . Applied Pragmatics 3:2  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.