Cover not available
Article published In:
Writing in interaction
Edited by Lorenza Mondada
[Language and Dialogue 6:1] 2016
► pp. 1–53

Writing-in-interaction

Studying writing as a multimodal phenomenon in social interaction

 | University of Helsinki
This article, introducing the special issue, aims at sketching the emerging field of studies on writing-in-interaction within an ethnomethodological (EM) and conversation analytic (CA) perspective. It does so by situating research carried out in this perspective within the existing literature and by offering some larger input on how the field could be developed. Writing-in-interaction is here approached by considering writing in social interaction as a multimodal phenomenon, with a special emphasis on handwriting. The paper presents current studies and further possible developments of writing in interaction, including the detailed analysis of video fragments. It shows how it is possible to finely analyze the moment-by-moment organization of writing as a multimodal social practice, demonstrating its embodied projectability, its material and multimodal graphic achievement, and its embeddedness in sequential organization and in multiactivity.
Keywords: multimodality, embodiment, writing, handwriting, multiactivity, social interaction
Published online: 19 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.01mon
References (134)
Alamargot, Denis, Sylvie Plane, Eric Lambert, and David Chesnet. 2010. “Using Eye and Pen Movements to Trace the Development of Writing Expertise: Case Studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th Grader, Graduate student, and Professional Writer.” Reading and Writing 231: 853–888 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuss, Birte, and Sae Oshima. 2012. “Negotiation of Entitlement in Proposal Sequences.” Discourse Studies 141: 67–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basso, Keith. 1974. “The Ethnography of Writing.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman, and Joel Sherzer. 423–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles (ed). 2007. Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
. 1988. Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bellemin-Noël, Jean, and Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz. 1972. Le Texte et l’avant-texte: Les brouillons d’un poème de Milosz. [The text and the avant-texte: The drafts of a poem by Milosz] Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Bereiter, Carl, and Marlene Scardamalia. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2008. Grassroots Literacy: Writing, Identity and Voice in Central Africa. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Robert, and Lorenza Mondada (eds). 2005. Les processus de la rédaction collaborative, [The process of collaborative writing]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Jane Danielewicz. 1990. “Properties of Spoken and Written Language”. In Comprehending Oral and Written Language. ed. by Rosalind Horowitz and S. Jay Samuels, 83–113. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, Paul Sambre and Dorien Van De Mieroop. This issue.
Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada. 2010. “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 1700–1718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppman, Jed, Daniel Ferrer, and Michael Groden (eds). 2004. Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2006. “When Documents ‘Speak’: Documents, Language and Interaction.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 63–80. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Yayoi Uno. 2007. “Calligraphy and musical gestures in the late works of Chou Wen-chung”. Contemporary Music Review, 261: 569–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayol, Michel. 1999. “From On-Line Management Problems to Strategies in Written Production.” In The Cognitive Demands of Writing: Processing Capacity and Working Memory Effects in Text Production, ed. by Mark Torrance and Gaynor Jeffery, 13–23. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Fenoglio, Irène. 2010. “Conceptualisation linguistique: Du manuscrit au texte: Contribution à l’étude des spécificités de l’écriture scientifique.” [Linguistic conceptualization: From manuscript to tet: Contributions to the study of the specificities of scientific writing]. Item. [URL].Google Scholar
Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. 1981. “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 321: 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gaulmyn, Marie-Madeleine de, Robert Bouchard, and Alain Rabatel (eds). 2001. Le processus rédactionnel: Écrire à plusieurs voix., [The writing process: Writing together] Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Gee, James. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Stephen J. 2004. “The Primacy of Gesture: Phenomenology and the Art of Chinese Calligraphy.” Analecta Husserliana LXXXI1: 175–186.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach.” In Handbook of Visual Analysis, ed. by Theo van Leeuwen, and Carey Jewitt, 157–182. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Ian Watt. 1963. “The Consequences of Literacy.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51: 304–345 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, David, Christian Heath, Paul Luff, and Paul Campion. 1995. “Conversation Analysis: Human–Computer Interaction and the General Practice Consultation.” In Perspectives on HCI: Diverse approaches, ed. by Andrew Monk, and G. Nigel Gilbert, 199–222. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Greiffenhagen, Christian. 2014. “The Materiality of Mathematics: Presenting Mathematics at the Blackboard.” The British Journal of Sociology 651: 502–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth. 2001. “La critique génétique, aujourd’hui et demain.” [Genetic critique, today and tomorrow]. L’Esprit Créateur 411: 9–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Keisanen, Tiina, Mondada, Lorenza, Nevile, Maurice (eds.). 2014. Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1986. The Origin of Writing. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel. 1972 “People Processing Organizations: An Exchange Approach.” American Sociological Review: 256–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Louis. 1979. “La critique génétique: origine et perspectives.” [“Genetic critique: origins and perspectives”]. In Essais de critique génétique, [Essays in genetic critique], ed. by Louis Hay. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Hazel, Spencer, and Kristian Mortensen. 2014. “Embodying the Institution: Object Manipulation in Developing Interaction in Study Counselling Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 651: 10–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian. 1982. “Preserving the Consultation: Medical Record Cards and Professional Conduct.” Sociology of Health and Illness 41: 56–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff. 1996. “Documents and Professional Practice: ‘Bad’ Organisational Reasons for ‘Good’ Clinical Records.” Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 354–363. New York: ACM. DOI logo
Heath, Christian, and Gillian Nicholls. 1997. “Animated Texts: Selective Renditions of News Stories.” In Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Roger Säljö, 63–86. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2015. “New Frontiers in Interactive Multimodal Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgapoulou and Tereza Spilloti, 398–402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke. 2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz. 2004. “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education 181: 220–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobs, Eva-Maria, and Daniel Perrin (eds). 2014. Handbook of Writing and Text Production. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, Teppo. This issue.
Jönsson, Linda, and Per Linell. 1991. Story Generations: From Dialogical Interviews to Written Reports in Police Interrogations. Text 111: 419–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kameo, Nahoko, and Jack Whalen. 2015. “Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action.” Qualitative Sociology 381: 205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karhu, Hanna. 2012. Säkeiden synty. Geneettinen tutkimus Otto Mannisen runokäsikirjoituksista. [The Genesis of Verses: A Genetic Analysis of Manuscripts of Otto Manninen]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Ronald T. 1996. “A model of Working Memory in Writing.” In The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michale Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 57–72. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Komter, Martha. 2001. “La construction de la preuve dans un interrogatoire de police. [The construction of evidence in a police interrogation.]” Droit et société 481: 367–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 391: 201–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Career of a Suspect’s Statement: Talk, Text, Context.” Discourse Studies 141: 731–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2002. “A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions Which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1851–1877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies 51: 51–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunitz, Silvia. 2015. “Scriptlines as Emergent Artifacts in Collaborative Group Planning.” Journal of Pragmatics 761: 135–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Visualisation and Cognition: ‘Drawing Things Together’”. In Representation in Scientific Practice. ed. by Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 19–68. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2004. The written language bias in linguistics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luff, Paul, et al.. 2007. “Augmented Paper: Developing Relationships Between Digital Content and Paper.” In The Disappearing Computer, Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments, ed. by Norbert Streitz, Achilles Kameas, and Irene Mavrommati, 275–297. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Moira Norrie, Beat Signer, and Peter Herdman. 2004. “Only Touching the Surface: Creating Affinities between Digital Content and Paper.” In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 523–532. New York: ACM. DOI logo
Luff, Paul, Karola Pitsch, Christian Heath, Peter Herdman, and Julian Wood. 2010. “Swiping Paper: The Second Hand, Mundane Artifacts, Gesture and Collaboration.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 141: 287–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1988. “The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences.” Human Studies 111: 201–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Ethnomethodology and History: Documents and the Production of History.” Ethnographic Studies 111: 87–106.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, and David Bogen. 1996. The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, Charles, Steve Graham and Jill Fitzgerald (eds). 2005. Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meehan, Albert J. 1986. “Record-Keeping Practices in the Policing of Juveniles.” Urban Life 151: 70–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, Piia, and Esa Lehtinen. 2014. “Initiating Activity Shifts Through Use of Appraisal Forms as Material Objects During Performance Appraisal Interviews.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 57–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2003. “Trajectoires d’objets de discours: Observer la science en train de se dire.” [Trajectories of discursive objects: observing science as emerging in talk]. Revue d’Etudes Romanes 541: 31–68.Google Scholar
. 2005a. “‘Il faut d’abord ramasser les arguments’: La coordination de la parole-en-interaction et de l’inscription dans l’élaboration collective des topics.” [‘You have first to put together the arguments’: coordination of talk-in-interaction and of inscription within the collective elaboration of topics] In Les processus de la rédaction collaborative, [The process of collaborative writing] ed. by Robert Bouchard, and Lorenza Mondada, 131–164. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Visions controversées de la carte: construire le visible par les gestes et la parole en interaction.” In Espaces, savoirs et incertitudes. [Space, Knowledge, and Uncertainty], ed. by Elisabeth Remy, Valérie November, Cristina D’Alessandro-Scapari, and Florian Charvolin, 15–31. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence. Discourse Studies 81: 117–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls.” Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 91.Google Scholar
. 2008b. “Production du savoir et interactions multimodales: Une étude de la modélisation spatiale comme activité pratique située et incarnée.” [Knowledge production and multimodal interaction: A study of space modelling as a situated and embodied practice]. Revue d’Anthropologie des connaissances 21: 219–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008c. “Documenter l’articulation des ressources multimodales dans le temps: La transcription d’enregistrements vidéos d’interactions.” [“Documenting the coordination of multimodal resources in time: Transcribing video recordings of interactions”]. In Donnees orales, les enjeux de la transcription, [Spoken data: transcription issues], ed. by Mireille Bilger, 127–155. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Methods for Reassembling Fragmented and Mobile Geographies.” In Mobile Methods, ed. by Monika Büscher, John Urry, and Katian Witchger, 138–163. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics 211: 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Video Analysis and the Temporality of Inscriptions within Social Interaction: The Case of Architects at Work.” Qualitative Research 121: 304–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 651: 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Linguistic Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by Ralph Ludwig, Steve Pagel, and Peter Mühlhäusler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. This issue.
Monteiro, David. This issue.
Moore, Robert J., Jack Whalen, and E. Cabell Hankinson Gathman. 2010. “The Work of the Work Order: Document Practice in Face-to-Face Service Encounters.” In Organisation, Interaction and Practice, ed. by Nick Llewellyn, and Jon Hindmarsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristian. 2013. “Writing Aloud: Some Interactional Functions of the Public Display of Emergent Writing.” Participatory Innovation Conference 2013 Lahti, Finland , 119–125.
Murphy, Keith. 2005. “Collaborative Imagining: The Interactive Use of Gestures, Talk, and Graphic Representation in Architectural Practice.” Semiotica 1561: 113–145.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2004. “Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims about Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 371: 447–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Søren Beck. 2014. “I’ll Just See What You Had Before: Making Computer Use Relevant While Patients Present Their Problems” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 79–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissi, Riikka. 2015. “From Entry Proposals to a Joint Statement: Practices of Shared Text Production in Multiparty Meeting Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 791: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, Martin. 2005. “The Social and Historical Context of Writing Research. In Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 11–27. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1982. Literacy and Orality. New York: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pälli, Pekka, and Esa Lehtinen. 2014. “Making Objectives Common in Performance Appraisal Interviews.” Language & Communication 391: 92–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Innhwa. 2012. “Asking Different Types of Polar Questions: The Interplay Between Turn, Sequence, and Context in Writing Conferences.” Discourse Studies 141: 613–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Requests: Knowledge and Entitlement in Writing Tutoring.” Language & Communication 431: 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel. 2013. The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitsch, Karola. 2006. Sprache, Körper, Intermediäre Objekte: Zur Multimodalität der Interaktion im bilingualen Geschichtsunterricht. [“Language, the Body, and intermediary Objects: Multimodality of interaction in bilingual history lectures]. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Unterrichtskommunikation Revisited: Tafelskizzen als interaktionale Ressource.” [“School communication revisited: Sketches on the blackboard as an interactional resource”] Bulletin VALS-ASLA 851: 59–80.Google Scholar
Poe, Edgar Allan. 1846. “The Philosophy of Composition.” Graham’s Magazine 281: 163–167.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul and Julie Hengst (eds). 2010. Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice. Houndsmill: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Steven L. Thorne. 2014. “Research Paradigms: Beyond Product, Process, and Social Activity.” In Handbook of Writing and Text Production, ed. by Jakobs, Eva-Maria, and Daniel Perrin, 31–54. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rauschenberg, Robert. 1953. Erased De Kooning Drawing. San Francisco: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Relieu Marc. 2006. “Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées.” [“Some remarks about conversation analysis and mediated technologies.”] Revue française de linguistique appliquée [French Journal of Applied Linguistics] 111: 17–32.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Tanya Stivers. 2001. “Achieving Activity Transitions in Physician-Patient Encounters.” Human Communication Research 271: 253–298.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Harold. 1952. “The American Action Painters.” Art News 511: 22–23.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna. 2001 “Looking Means Listening: Coordinating Displays of Engagement in Doctor-Patient Interaction.” Social Science & Medicine 521: 1093–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. “Body Torque.” Social Research 651: 535–586.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Reinhold. 2001. “Die Tafel als Arbeitsinstrument und Statusrequisite.” [The blackboard as tool of work and indicator of status]. In Gesprächsforschung: Tendenzen und Perspektiven, [Discourse analysis: trends and perspectives], ed. by Zsuzsanna Iványi, and András Kertész, 221–242. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Werner Kallmeyer. 2001. “Interaction by Inscription.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 465–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2011. “The changing meaning of things: Found objects and inscriptions in social interaction.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Brian. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Svensson, Hanna. 2016. “Surveiller et corriger: L’accomplissement interactionnel de révisions d’inscriptions publiques.” [“To surveil and to correct. The interactional achievement of revisions of public inscriptions.”] In Participation et asymétries dans l’interaction institutionnelle [Participation and asymmetries in institutional interactions], ed. by Lorenza Mondada, and Sara Keel. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, Kimmo. 2008. “Palaute ongelmanratkaisuna: Opponentin tekstipalaute graduseminaarissa. [The Feedback Sequence as Problem-Solving: The Opponent’s Text Feedback in the Master’s Thesis Seminar.]” Kasvatus 391: 439–455.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Varovasti edeten ja taas perääntyen: Opponentin palautevuoron rakentuminen [Gently Forward, Then Back Again: Constructing Opponent Feedback].” Virittäjä 115.2 (2011).Google Scholar
. This issue.
Svinhufvud, Kimmo, and Sanna Vehviläinen. 2013. “Papers, Documents, and the Opening of an Academic Supervision Encounter.” Text & Talk 331: 139–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, Margaret H. 1999. “Re-Engaging and Dis-Engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society 281: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Producing Text through Talk: Question-Answering Activity in Classroom Peer Groups.” Linguistics and Education 131: 533–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, Steven L. 2012. Gaming Writing: Supervernaculars, Stylization, and Semiotic Remediation. In Technology Across Writing Contexts and Tasks, ed. by Greg Kessler, Ana Oskoz, and Idoia Elola, 297–316. San Marcos: Calico.Google Scholar
Van Charldorp, Tessa. 2011. “The Coordination of Talk and Typing in Police Interrogations.” Crossroads of Language, Interaction and Culture 81: 61–92.Google Scholar
. 2013. “The Intertwining of Talk and Technology: How Talk and Typing Are Combined in the Various Phases of the Police Interrogation.” Discourse & Communication 71: 221–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Galen, Gerard P. 1993. “Handwriting: A developmental Perspective.” In Motor Development in Early and Later Childhood: Longitudinal Approaches, ed. by Alex F. Kalverboer, Brian Hopkins, and Reint Geuze, 143–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009a. “Problems in the Research Problem: Critical Feedback and Resistance in Academic Supervision.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 531: 185–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. “Student-Initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 421: 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Question-Prefaced Advice in Feedback Sequences of Finnish Academic Supervisions.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 31–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2005 “Peer Tutoring in a Graduate Writing Centre: Identity, Expertise, and Advice Resisting.” Applied Linguistics 261: 141–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Complex Advice Acceptance as a Resource for Managing Asymmetries.” Text & Talk 271: 107–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod. 2009. Analysing Practical and Professional Texts: A Naturalistic Approach. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Weilenmann, Alexandra, and Gustav Lymer. 2014. “Incidental and Essential Objects in Interaction.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 319–337. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Jack. 1995a. “Expert Systems Versus Systems for Experts.” In Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, ed. by Peter J. Thomas, 161–183. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1995b. “A Technology of Order Production: Computer-Aided Dispatch in Public Safety Communications.” In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul Ten Have, and George Psathas, 187–230. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Whalen, Jack, and Erik Vinkhuyzen. 2000. “Expert Systems in (Inter)action: Diagnosing Document Machine Problems over the Telephone.” In Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design, ed. by Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh, and Christian Heath, 92–140. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn, and Jack Whalen. 2004. “Studying workscapes.” In Discourse and technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, ed. by Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon, 208–229. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman. Don 1992. “The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance.” In Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (49)

Cited by 49 other publications

Olinger, Andrea R., Alison Heron‐Hruby, James S. Chisholm, Braydon L. Dungan, Hannah M. Conn & Julia P. Nitishin
2025. How Do I Want to be Read? Embodied Autobiographical and Discoursal Selves in Preservice English Teachers' Feedback to High School Writers. Reading Research Quarterly 60:1 DOI logo
bin Abdul Hakim, Muhammad Kamal, Syamsi Setiadi, Shafruddin Tajuddin & Ahmad Miftahuddin
2024. The Effectiveness of CEFR Model-based Material on Arabic Essay Writing (Kitabah Hurrah) Ability. KnE Social Sciences DOI logo
Gudmundsen, Jenny
2024. Using the chat function for L2 learning in video-mediated interaction. Linguistics and Education 83 ► pp. 101320 ff. DOI logo
Harikkala-Laihinen, Riikka, Sanna Fäldt & Erik Bäckman
2024. From words to action (research): a new generation of workplace training. Journal of Workplace Learning 36:9 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Padua, Joao Pedro
2024. Ethnomethodology of written discourse: An analytical model for treating written discourse as ongoing social action. Journal of Pragmatics 222 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tomasine, Joseph S.
2024. Accomplishing feedback through inscription during reading assessment interaction. Linguistics and Education 80 ► pp. 101282 ff. DOI logo
Tomasine, Joseph S.
2024. The multimodal organization of feedback and its documentation: multiactivity during formal, formative reading assessment. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Zhai, Mengying
2024. Collaborative character searches in L2 Chinese peer writing: sequential design and object affordances. Classroom Discourse ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mlynář, Jakub
2023. Lifting the pen and the gaze: embodied recruitment in collaborative writing. Text & Talk 43:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Nicolai, Mart & Neil Aaron Thompson
2023. ‘How might we?’: Studying new venture ideation in and through practices. Scandinavian Journal of Management 39:2 ► pp. 101275 ff. DOI logo
Weiste, Elina, Inka Koskela, Aku Kallio, Hanna Keränen, Sanna Pesonen, Erja Sormunen, Pirjo Juvonen-Posti & Johanna Ruusuvuori
2023. Balancing participation in writing meeting minutes online in video-mediated return-to-work negotiations. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Doody, Sara & Natasha Artemeva
2022. “Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Genre Analysis of Symbolic Mediation in Medical Physics. Written Communication 39:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
GREER, TIM & ZACHARY NANBU
2022. Visualizing Emergent Turn Construction: Seeing Writing While Speaking. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole
2022. Conversational functions of ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’ in collaborative writing of primary school children. Classroom Discourse 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Komter, Martha
2022. Institutional and Academic Transcripts of Police Interrogations. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Zohre
2022. Language-related episodes and feedback in synchronous voiced-based and asynchronous text-based computer-mediated communications. Journal of Computers in Education 9:3 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Musk, Nigel
2022. Using online translation tools in computer-assisted collaborative EFL writing. Classroom Discourse 13:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka & Esa Lehtinen
2022. Digital Documenting Practices: Collaborative Writing in Workplace Training. Written Communication 39:4 ► pp. 564 ff. DOI logo
Norén, Niklas, Helen Melander Bowden & Ann-Carita Evaldsson
2022. Young students’ treatment of synthetic voicing as an interactional resource in digital writing. Classroom Discourse 13:3 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
SUZUKI, Minato
2022. Conversation Analysis of Showing Picture Drawing. Japanese Sociological Review 73:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Neil Aaron & Orla Byrne
2022. Imagining Futures: Theorizing the Practical Knowledge of Future-making. Organization Studies 43:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Aline, David & Yuri Hosoda
2021. Deployment of the formulaic utterance “how about∼” in task-based second language classroom discussions. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Balaman, Ufuk
2021. The Interactional Organization of Video‐Mediated Collaborative Writing: Focus on Repair Practices. TESOL Quarterly 55:3 ► pp. 979 ff. DOI logo
Hansell, Katri & Michaela Pörn
2021. Samskrivande i virtuell lärmiljö. Nordand 16:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Magnusson, Simon
2021. Establishing jointness in proximal multiparty decision-making: The case of collaborative writing. Journal of Pragmatics 181 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Mathieu, Corinne S., Nausica Marcos Miguel & Teppo Jakonen
2021. Introduction: classroom discourse at the intersection of language education and materiality. Classroom Discourse 12:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2021. Interactional integration of talk and note-taking. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Yagi, Junichi
2021. Enactingburikko. Applied Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Abe, Makoto
2020. Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 49 ► pp. 100752 ff. DOI logo
Lindholm, Camilla, Melisa Stevanovic, Taina Valkeapää & Elina Weiste
2020. Writing: A Versatile Resource in the Treatment of the Clients’ Proposals. In Joint Decision Making in Mental Health, ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Nishizaka, Aug
2020. Appearance and Action: The Sequential Organization of Instructions in Japanese Calligraphy Lessons. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:3 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka & Pekka Pälli
2020. Textual artefacts at the centre of sensemaking: The use of discursive-material resources in constructing joint understanding in organisational workshops. Discourse Studies 22:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Dolata, Mateusz, Doris Agotai, Simon Schubiger & Gerhard Schwabe
2019. Pen-and-paper Rituals in Service Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3:CSCW ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fogarty-Bourget, Chloë G., Natasha Artemeva & Janna Fox
2019. Gestural silence. In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301], ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Jakonen, Teppo
2019. The integration of content and language in students’ task answer production in the bilingual classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22:4 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Juvonen, Riitta, Marie Tanner, Christina Olin-Scheller, Liisa Tainio & Anna Slotte
2019. ‘Being stuck’. Analyzing text-planning activities in digitally rich upper secondary school classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21 ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Lefebvre, Augustin
2019. The Anatomy of Learning a Foreign Language in Classroom with a Textbook: An Interactional and Multimodal Approach. In Reconceptualizing Connections between Language, Literacy and Learning [Educational Linguistics, 39], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Jürgen Streeck
2018. The body in interaction. In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Karvonen, Ulla, Liisa Tainio & Sara Routarinne
2018. Uncovering the pedagogical potential of texts: Curriculum materials in classroom interaction in first language and literature education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 17 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Räisänen, Tiina
2018. Translingual Practices in Global Business. A Longitudinal Study of a Professional Communicative Repertoire. In Translanguaging as Everyday Practice [Multilingual Education, 28], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Dolata, Mateusz & Gerhard Schwabe
2017. Paper Practices in Institutional Talk: How Financial Advisors Impress their Clients. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26:4-6 ► pp. 769 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Joan Kelly & Emily Rine Butler
2017. The shifting role of a document in managing conflict and shaping the outcome of a small group meeting. Text & Talk 37:5 DOI logo
Kusters, Annelies, Massimiliano Spotti, Ruth Swanwick & Elina Tapio
2017. Beyond languages, beyond modalities: transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism 14:3 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Hanh thi
2017. The sequential organization of text and speech in multimodal synchronous computer-mediated communication. Text & Talk 37:1 DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:3 ► pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Le défi de la multimodalité en interaction. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2018. Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2019. Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 145 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2023. The normative order of sensing: enacting the tasting sheet in tasting training sessions. Text & Talk DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.