Article published in:
Writing in interaction
Edited by Lorenza Mondada
[Language and Dialogue 6:1] 2016
► pp. 140178


Asmuss, Birte
2012“Implikationen technischer Arbeitsgeräte für die Koordination und Ko-Orientierung in einer Arbeitsbesprechung” [“Consequences of technical devices for the coordination and the co-orientation of professional meetings”]. In Raum als Interaktive Ressource [Space as interactional resource], ed. by H. Hausendorf, L. Mondada, and R. Schmitt, 317–346. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Sae Oshima
2012 “Negotiation of Entitlement in Proposal Sequences.” Discourse Studies 14 (1): 67–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada
2013 “Walking Away. The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 47: 41–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys
this issue.
Goodwin, Charles
2000 “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greiffenhagen, Christian, and Wes Sharrock
2005 “Gestures in the Blackboard Work of Mathematics Instruction.” Proceedings of Interacting Bodies, Online Proceedings of the 2d ISGS Conference . http://​gesture​-lyon2005​.ens​-lsh​.fr​/article​.php3​?id​_article​=259
Hazel, Spencer, and Christian Mortensen
2014 “Embodying the Institution. Object Manipulation in Developing Interaction in Study Counselling Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 10–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
2000Technology in Action. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rodney Watson
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations: Some Instances Analyzed.” Semiotica 30: 245–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols With an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by G.H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komter, Marta L.
2006 “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (3): 201–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2011 “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities Within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics 21 (2): 283–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-taking in Institutional Multi-party Interactions: The Example of Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Bodies in Action: Multimodal Analysis of Walking and Talking.” Language and Dialogue 4 (3) : 357–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients.” Gesprächsforschung 16: 1–62. www​.gespraechsforschung​-ozs​.deGoogle Scholar
2016 “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Language Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by R. Ludwig, P. Mühlhäusler, and S. Pagel, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
in press. “Questions on the Move.” In Multiple Temporalities in Interaction ed. by A. Deppermann, and J. Streeck Amsterdam Benjamins
Nissi, Riikka
2015 “From Entry Proposals to a Joint Statement: Practices of Shared Text Production in Multiparty Meeting Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 79: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pälli, Pekka, and Esa Lehtinen
2014 “Making Objectives Common in Performance Appraisal Interviews.” Language & Communication 39: 92–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitsch, Karola
2007 “Unterrichtskommunikation Revisited: Tafelskizzen als interaktionale Ressource.” [“School communication revisited: Sketches on the blackboard as an interactional resource”] Bulletin VALS-ASLA 85: 59–80.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A.
1998 “Body Torque.” Social Research 65 (3): 535–586.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2013 “Constructing a Proposal as a Thought: A Way to Manage Problems in the Initiation of Joint Decision-making in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Pragmatics 23 (3): 519–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, Hanna
2016 “Surveiller et corriger. L’accomplissement interactionnel de révisions d’inscriptions publiques.” [“To surveil and to correct. The interactional achievement of revisions of public inscriptions”] In Participation et Asymétries dans l’Interaction Institutionnelle [Participation and asymmetries in institutional interactions], ed. by L. Mondada, and S. Keel, Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, Kimmo
this issue.
Svinhufvud, Kimmo., and Sanna Vehviläinen
2013 “Papers, Documents, and the Opening of an Academic Supervision Encounter.” Text & Talk 33: 139–166.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Mondada, Lorenza
2018.  In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction,  pp. 287 ff. Crossref logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2021. Interactional integration of talk and note-taking. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1  pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo
Norén, Niklas, Helen Melander Bowden & Ann-Carita Evaldsson
2021. Young students’ treatment of synthetic voicing as an interactional resource in digital writing. Classroom Discourse  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.