Article published In:
Language and DialogueVol. 6:3 (2016) ► pp.349–369
How to verify a theory of dialogue
In recent decades the term ‘theory’ has pervasively been used in the literature without any reflection upon the conditions of its legitimate use. The paper focuses on the issue of what makes up a theory. Constitutive components are the object-of-study and the methodology. The object of a theory has to be the minimal autonomous unit. The object ‘dialogue’ is a human affair, language used by human beings in the dialogic action game. Any approach which claims to be a theory needs to justify its hypotheses. A theory about human actions and behaviour in the end relates to anthropological insights which can eventually be verified by neuroscience. It is sociobiology which unites the different disciplines in their search for the unity of knowledge.
References (48)
Allan, Keith, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt
(eds) 2011 The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Anscombe, Gertrude E
1957 Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
Arnett, Ronald
forthcoming. “Language as the Originative House of Dialogic Ethics.” In Language and Dialogue: A Handbook of Key Issues in the Field ed. by Edda Weigand New York Routledge
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Burke, Kenneth
1950 A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Carruthers, Peter, and Peter K. Smith
(eds) 1996 Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cho, Yongkil
2005 Grammatik und Höflichkeit im Sprachvergleich. Direktive Handlungsspiele des Bittens, Aufforderns und Anweisens im Deutschen und Koreanischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Cooren, François
2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue. Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Damasio, Antonio
1994 Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.
Duranti, Alessandro
2015 The Anthropology of Intentions. Language in a World of Others. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N.J., Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell
(eds) 2014 The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fetzer, Anita
Feynman, Richard P
2001 The Pleasure of Finding Things out. London: Penguin Books.
Frawley, William
1987 “Review Article: van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, I-IV.” Language 631: 361–397.
Gell-Mann, Murray
1994 The Quark and the Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. London: Abacus.
Grein, Marion
2007 “The Speech Act of Refusal within the Minimal Action Game.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 95–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Habermas, Jürgen
1991 “Comments on John Searle: ‘Meaning, Communication, and Representation’.” In John Searle and his Critics, ed. by Ernest Lepore and Robert van Gulick, 17–29. Cambridge, Mass./ Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmes, Janet
1988 “Paying Compliments: A Sex-preferential Politeness Strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 445–456.
Hundsnurscher, Franz
1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” In Akten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, Basel 1980. Part 2, ed. by Heinz Rupp and Hans-Gert Roloff, 89–95. Bern: Lang.
Levinson, Stephen C
2000 Presumptive Meaning. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.
Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing.
Lumsden, Charles J., and Edward O. Wilson
2005 Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific.
Marchand, Trevor H.J
2010 “Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relation between Minds, Bodies and Environment.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (2): 1–21.
Martinet, André
1975 “Functional Linguistics. La linguistique fonctionnelle.” In Studies in Functional Syntax. Études de syntax fonctionnelle, ed. by André Martinet, 9–81. München: Fink.
Mey, Jacob
2001 Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Premawardhena, Neelakshi Chandrasena
2007 “How Diplomatic Can a Language Be?” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 213–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prigogine, Ilya
1994 Les Lois du Chaos. Paris: Flammarion.
Rapaille, Clotard
2007 The Culture Code. New York: Broadway Books.
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, and Michael A. Arbib
1998 “Language within our Grasp.” Trends in Neurosciences 21(5): 188–194.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson
1978 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 7–55. New York: Academic Press.
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: At the University Press.
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken
1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, Herbert A
1962 “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1061: 467–482.
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge etc: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, Teun A
(ed.) 1985 Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. I–IV1. London etc.: Academic Press.
Verschueren, Jef
1987 “The Pragmatic Perspective.” In The Pragmatic Perspective. Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, eds. by Jef Verschueren, and Marcella Bertucelli-Papi, 3–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Weigand, Edda
2002 “Constitutive Features of Human Dialogic Interaction: Mirror Neurons and What They Tell Us about Human Abilities.” In Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, ed. by Maxim I. Stamenov and Vittorio Gallese, 229–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2009 Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011 “Paradigm Changes in Linguistics: From Reductionism to Holism.” Language Sciences 331: 544–549.
2015 “Persuasion or the Integration of Grammar and Rhetoric.” In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue, ed. by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu, and Stanca Măda, 3–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
forthcoming. “The Concept of ‘Language’ in an Utterance Grammar.” In Language and Dialogue: A Handbook of Key Issues in the Field ed. by Edda Weigand New York Routledge
Wilson, Edward O
1975 Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge/Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
1999 Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
2004 On Human Nature. With a New Preface. Cambridge/Mass./London: Harvard University Press (originally published 1978).
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Mazepova, Olena
2023. COMPLIMENTS IN PERSIAN-SPEAKING COMMUNICATION: UNIVERSAL AND ETHNOSPECIFIC. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Oriental Languages and Literatures :29 ► pp. 29 ff. 
Arnett, Ronald C.
Bondi, Marina
Grein, Marion
Thibault, Paul J.
Ucok-Sayrak, Inci Ozum
Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita
Linell, Per
Moghaddam, Mostafa Morady
Salam El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel
2017. The compliment response strategies of Egyptian Arabic-English bilinguals. Language and Dialogue 7:3 ► pp. 387 ff.
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.