Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 6:3 (2016) ► pp.422446
References
Angouri, Jo
2012 “Managing Disagreement in Problem Solving Meeting Talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1565–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
2012 “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1549–1553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breton, Philippe
2003L’argumentation dans la communication. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Carter, Adam J
2014 “Disagreement, Relativism, and Doxastic Revision.” Erkenntnis 79 (1): 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, David, and Jennifer Lackey
(eds) 2013The Epistemology of Disagreement. New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohnitz, Daniel, and Teresa Marquez
(eds) 2014a “Disagreements.” Special issue Erkenntnis 79 (1).Google Scholar
2014b “Disagreements.” Special issue Erkenntnis 79 (1): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1972/1991Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard, and Ted Warfield
(eds) 2009Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geyer, Naomy
2008Discourse and Politeness. Ambivalent Face in Japanese. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar
Glaser, Klaren
2014Inductive or Deductive. The Impact of Method of Instruction on The Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence. Lüneburg Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse”. Studies in Communication Sciences 3 (1): 25–53.Google Scholar
Kakavá, Christina
1993Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Casual Conversations and Classroom Discourse. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Kappel, Klemens
2014 “Factual Disagreement and Political Legitimacy.” In Expertise and Democracy, ed. by Cathrine Holst, 141–171. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas
2005 “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Vol. 11, ed. by John Hawthorne and Tamar Gendler, 167–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL].Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1992Les interactions verbales. Tome II1. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
1994Les interactions verbales. Tome III1. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Koczogh, Helga
2013 “Scrutinizing the Concept of (Verbal) Disagreement.” Argumentum 91: 211–222.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London–New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A
2004Power and Politeness in Action. Disagreement in Oral Communication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
2008 “Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meaning and Implicit Disagreements.” Informal logic 28(3): 203–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, John
2007 “Relativism and Disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 1231: 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Sarah
2008 “Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics 31, ed. by Russ Shafer-Landau, 87–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, Christopher
2009Reasonable Disagreement. A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Netz, Hadar
2014 “Disagreement Patterns in Gifted Classes.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 142–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1958/2008Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell
2013 “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37. [URL].Google Scholar
Plunkett, David
2015 “Which Concepts Should We Use? Metalinguistic Negotiation and The Methodology of Philosophy.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. Special Issue: Philosophical Methodology and Metaphilosophy 58 (7–8): 828–874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rees-Miller, Janie
2000 “Power, Severity, and Context in Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (8): 1087–1111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Suzanne
2002 “Linguistic Feature Variation within Disagreements: An Empirical Investigation”. Text 22 (2): 301–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
2012 “Disagreement, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1554–1564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1960Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1963Facts and Values: Studies in Ethical Analysis. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1998“The Nature of Ethical Disagreement” (reproduction on Facts and Values) . In Ethical Theory 1. The Question of Objectivity, ed. by James Rachel, 43–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2002 “Agonism in Academic Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (11): 1651–1669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verbruggen, Freddy
1965 “The Attitude Theory and the Disagreement or Controversy within Philosophy and between Philosophy and Science. A plea for a Theory of Persuasive Communication and Argumentation”. Philosophica 31: 145–159.Google Scholar
Waldron, Vincent R., and James L. Applegate
1994 “Interpersonal Construct Differentiation and Conversational Planning. An Examination of Two Cognitive Accounts for the Production of Competent Verbal Disagreement Tactics”. Human Communication Research 21 (1): 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas
2001 “Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy 371: 117–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yule, George
1996Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionaries Online [URL]
Merriam Webster Dictionary Online: [URL]
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
2002Interacţiunea verbală în limba română actuală. Corpus selectiv. Schiţă de tipologie (Verbal Interaction in Present-day Romanian. Selective Corpora. Typology) [IVLRA]. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
2007Interacţiunea verbală (IV II). Aspecte teoretice şi aplicative. Corpus] (Verbal Interaction (IV II). Theoretical and Applicative Aspects. Corpora) [IV II1]. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
http://www.realitatea.net/realitatea_romaneasca.html
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Miron, Constantin & Livia Miron
2017. Case Study on Rehabilitation Solutions for Single Family Homes Using Eco-Sustainable, Natural, Local Materials. Advanced Engineering Forum 21  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.