Cooperative expressions of disagreement in Romanian culture
Liliana Hoinărescu | “Iorgu Iordan — Al. Rosetti” Institute of Linguistics of the Romanian Academy (Romania)
This paper aims to investigate the pragmatic features and strategies of disagreement in contemporary spoken Romanian, on the basis of authentic data. Disagreement will be regarded in its cooperative dimension, considering that all types of genuine, bona fide communication involve various stages in establishing an intellectual consensus. Special attention will be given to the main causes which generate communicative divergence: metalinguistic/metadiscursive (the dispute on the semantic/pragmatic use of language), dialectical (the debate of general ideas and principles) or factual (contradictory interpretation of facts). We shall try to formulate some general conclusions, in order to configure the profile of intellectual disagreement in Romanian society and to integrate it into an intercultural and anthropological perspective.
References
Angouri, Jo
2012 “
Managing Disagreement in Problem Solving Meeting Talk.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1565–1579.
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
2012 “
Theorising Disagreement.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1549–1553.
Breton, Philippe
2003 L’argumentation dans la communication. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
Carter, Adam J
2014 “
Disagreement, Relativism, and Doxastic Revision.”
Erkenntnis 79 (1): 155–172.
Christensen, David, and Jennifer Lackey
(eds) 2013 The Epistemology of Disagreement. New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohnitz, Daniel, and Teresa Marquez
(eds) 2014a “
Disagreements.”
Special issue Erkenntnis 79 (1).
Cohnitz, Daniel, and Teresa Marquez
2014b “
Disagreements.”
Special issue Erkenntnis 79 (1): 1–10.
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “
Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”.
Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367.
Ducrot, Oswald
1972/1991 Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.
Feldman, Richard, and Ted Warfield
(eds) 2009 Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geyer, Naomy
2008 Discourse and Politeness. Ambivalent Face in Japanese. Norfolk: Biddles.
Glaser, Klaren
2014 Inductive or Deductive. The Impact of Method of Instruction on The Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence. Lüneburg Universität Dissertation.
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “
Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse”.
Studies in Communication Sciences 3 (1): 25–53.
Kakavá, Christina
1993 Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Casual Conversations and Classroom Discourse. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
Kappel, Klemens
2014 “
Factual Disagreement and Political Legitimacy.” In
Expertise and Democracy, ed. by
Cathrine Holst, 141–171. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.
Kelly, Thomas
2005 “
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In
Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Vol. 11, ed. by
John Hawthorne and
Tamar Gendler, 167–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL].
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1992 Les interactions verbales. Tome II1. Paris: Armand Colin.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1994 Les interactions verbales. Tome III1. Paris: Armand Colin.
Koczogh, Helga
2013 “
Scrutinizing the Concept of (Verbal) Disagreement.”
Argumentum 91: 211–222.
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “
Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.”
Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216.
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London–New York: Longman.
Locher, Miriam A
2004 Power and Politeness in Action. Disagreement in Oral Communication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
2008 “
Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meaning and Implicit Disagreements.”
Informal logic 28(3): 203–228.
MacFarlane, John
2007 “
Relativism and Disagreement.”
Philosophical Studies 1231: 17–31.
McGrath, Sarah
2008 “
Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise.” In
Oxford Studies in Metaethics 31, ed. by
Russ Shafer-Landau, 87–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McMahon, Christopher
2009 Reasonable Disagreement. A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Netz, Hadar
2014 “
Disagreement Patterns in Gifted Classes.”
Journal of Pragmatics 611: 142–160.
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1958/2008 Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell
2013 “
Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.”
Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
[URL].
Plunkett, David
2015 “
Which Concepts Should We Use? Metalinguistic Negotiation and The Methodology of Philosophy.”
Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. Special Issue: Philosophical Methodology and Metaphilosophy 58 (7–8): 828–874.
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “
Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by
J. Maxwell Atkinson and
John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rees-Miller, Janie
2000 “
Power, Severity, and Context in Disagreement.”
Journal of Pragmatics 32 (8): 1087–1111.
Scott, Suzanne
2002 “
Linguistic Feature Variation within Disagreements: An Empirical Investigation”.
Text 22 (2): 301–328.
Sifianou, Maria
2012 “
Disagreement, Face and Politeness.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1554–1564.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1960 Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1963 Facts and Values: Studies in Ethical Analysis. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1998 “The Nature of Ethical Disagreement” (reproduction on Facts and Values)
. In
Ethical Theory 1. The Question of Objectivity, ed. by
James Rachel, 43–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah
2002 “
Agonism in Academic Discourse.”
Journal of Pragmatics 34 (11): 1651–1669.
Verbruggen, Freddy
1965 “
The Attitude Theory and the Disagreement or Controversy within Philosophy and between Philosophy and Science. A plea for a Theory of Persuasive Communication and Argumentation”.
Philosophica 31: 145–159.
Waldron, Vincent R., and James L. Applegate
1994 “
Interpersonal Construct Differentiation and Conversational Planning. An Examination of Two Cognitive Accounts for the Production of Competent Verbal Disagreement Tactics”.
Human Communication Research 21 (1): 3–35.
Walton, Douglas
2001 “
Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments.”
Argumentation and Advocacy 371: 117–132.
Walton, Douglas
2006 Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, George
1996 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cambridge Dictionaries Online
[URL]
Merriam Webster Dictionary Online:
[URL]
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
2002 Interacţiunea verbală în limba română actuală. Corpus selectiv. Schiţă de tipologie (Verbal Interaction in Present-day Romanian. Selective Corpora. Typology) [IVLRA]. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
2007 Interacţiunea verbală (IV II). Aspecte teoretice şi aplicative. Corpus] (Verbal Interaction (IV II). Theoretical and Applicative Aspects. Corpora) [IV II1]. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
http://www.realitatea.net/realitatea_romaneasca.html
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Miron, Constantin & Livia Miron
2017.
Case Study on Rehabilitation Solutions for Single Family Homes Using Eco-Sustainable, Natural, Local Materials.
Advanced Engineering Forum 21
► pp. 445 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.