Cooperative expressions of disagreement in Romanian culture
Liliana Hoinărescu | “Iorgu Iordan — Al. Rosetti” Institute of Linguistics of the Romanian Academy (Romania)
This paper aims to investigate the pragmatic features and strategies of disagreement in contemporary spoken Romanian, on the basis of authentic data. Disagreement will be regarded in its cooperative dimension, considering that all types of genuine, bona fide communication involve various stages in establishing an intellectual consensus. Special attention will be given to the main causes which generate communicative divergence: metalinguistic/metadiscursive (the dispute on the semantic/pragmatic use of language), dialectical (the debate of general ideas and principles) or factual (contradictory interpretation of facts). We shall try to formulate some general conclusions, in order to configure the profile of intellectual disagreement in Romanian society and to integrate it into an intercultural and anthropological perspective.
References (48)
Angouri, Jo
2012 “
Managing Disagreement in Problem Solving Meeting Talk.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1565–1579.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
2012 “
Theorising Disagreement.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1549–1553.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breton, Philippe
2003 L’argumentation dans la communication. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, Adam J
2014 “
Disagreement, Relativism, and Doxastic Revision.”
Erkenntnis 79 (1): 155–172.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christensen, David, and Jennifer Lackey
(eds) 2013 The Epistemology of Disagreement. New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohnitz, Daniel, and Teresa Marquez
(eds) 2014a “
Disagreements.”
Special issue Erkenntnis 79 (1).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohnitz, Daniel, and Teresa Marquez
2014b “
Disagreements.”
Special issue Erkenntnis 79 (1): 1–10.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “
Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”.
Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ducrot, Oswald
1972/1991 Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, Richard, and Ted Warfield
(eds) 2009 Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geyer, Naomy
2008 Discourse and Politeness. Ambivalent Face in Japanese. Norfolk: Biddles.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glaser, Klaren
2014 Inductive or Deductive. The Impact of Method of Instruction on The Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence. Lüneburg Universität Dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “
Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse”.
Studies in Communication Sciences 3 (1): 25–53.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kakavá, Christina
1993 Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Casual Conversations and Classroom Discourse. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kappel, Klemens
2014 “
Factual Disagreement and Political Legitimacy.” In
Expertise and Democracy, ed. by
Cathrine Holst, 141–171. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelly, Thomas
2005 “
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In
Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Vol. 11, ed. by
John Hawthorne and
Tamar Gendler, 167–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1992 Les interactions verbales. Tome II1. Paris: Armand Colin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1994 Les interactions verbales. Tome III1. Paris: Armand Colin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koczogh, Helga
2013 “
Scrutinizing the Concept of (Verbal) Disagreement.”
Argumentum 91: 211–222.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “
Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.”
Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London–New York: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A
2004 Power and Politeness in Action. Disagreement in Oral Communication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
2008 “
Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meaning and Implicit Disagreements.”
Informal logic 28(3): 203–228.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacFarlane, John
2007 “
Relativism and Disagreement.”
Philosophical Studies 1231: 17–31.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGrath, Sarah
2008 “
Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise.” In
Oxford Studies in Metaethics 31, ed. by
Russ Shafer-Landau, 87–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMahon, Christopher
2009 Reasonable Disagreement. A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Netz, Hadar
2014 “
Disagreement Patterns in Gifted Classes.”
Journal of Pragmatics 611: 142–160.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1958/2008 Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell
2013 “
Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.”
Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plunkett, David
2015 “
Which Concepts Should We Use? Metalinguistic Negotiation and The Methodology of Philosophy.”
Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. Special Issue: Philosophical Methodology and Metaphilosophy 58 (7–8): 828–874.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “
Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by
J. Maxwell Atkinson and
John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rees-Miller, Janie
2000 “
Power, Severity, and Context in Disagreement.”
Journal of Pragmatics 32 (8): 1087–1111.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, Suzanne
2002 “
Linguistic Feature Variation within Disagreements: An Empirical Investigation”.
Text 22 (2): 301–328.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria
2012 “
Disagreement, Face and Politeness.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1554–1564.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1960 Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1963 Facts and Values: Studies in Ethical Analysis. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stevenson, Charles Leslie
1998 “The Nature of Ethical Disagreement” (reproduction on Facts and Values)
. In
Ethical Theory 1. The Question of Objectivity, ed. by
James Rachel, 43–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah
2002 “
Agonism in Academic Discourse.”
Journal of Pragmatics 34 (11): 1651–1669.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verbruggen, Freddy
1965 “
The Attitude Theory and the Disagreement or Controversy within Philosophy and between Philosophy and Science. A plea for a Theory of Persuasive Communication and Argumentation”.
Philosophica 31: 145–159.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waldron, Vincent R., and James L. Applegate
1994 “
Interpersonal Construct Differentiation and Conversational Planning. An Examination of Two Cognitive Accounts for the Production of Competent Verbal Disagreement Tactics”.
Human Communication Research 21 (1): 3–35.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, Douglas
2001 “
Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments.”
Argumentation and Advocacy 371: 117–132.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, Douglas
2006 Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yule, George
1996 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cambridge Dictionaries Online
[URL]
Merriam Webster Dictionary Online:
[URL]
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
2002 Interacţiunea verbală în limba română actuală. Corpus selectiv. Schiţă de tipologie (Verbal Interaction in Present-day Romanian. Selective Corpora. Typology) [IVLRA]. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
2007 Interacţiunea verbală (IV II). Aspecte teoretice şi aplicative. Corpus] (Verbal Interaction (IV II). Theoretical and Applicative Aspects. Corpora) [IV II1]. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
http://www.realitatea.net/realitatea_romaneasca.html
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Miron, Constantin & Livia Miron
2017.
Case Study on Rehabilitation Solutions for Single Family Homes Using Eco-Sustainable, Natural, Local Materials.
Advanced Engineering Forum 21
► pp. 445 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.