This essay examines the importance of semioethics in relationship to the work of Levinas. The interplay of semioethics and Levinas’s commitment to “ethics as first philosophy” announces the communicative height and weight of a semiotic signification that demands responsive human action. Semioethics is a communicative act that wades through the plethora of signs in the global communication production system with the objective of discerning signs of ill health that curtail care of life. Semioethics necessitates attentiveness and responsiveness to Otherness and difference. Semioethics functions as resistance, the unwillingness to accept and abide within an unreflective communication production system composed of taken-for-granted sameness of process and procedure.
2004 “A Dialogic Ethic ‘Between’ Buber and Levinas: A Responsive Ethical ‘I,’” In Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter, and Kenneth N. Cissna, 75–90. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Arnett, Ronald C.
2015 “Awakening Communicative Justice: Attending to the Precariat.” Social Transformations 11: 1–43.
Arnett, Ronald C.
2017Levinas’s Rhetorical Demand: The Unending Obligation of Communication Ethics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bahktin, Mikhail
1984Rabelais and His World. Bloomingdale, IN: Indiana University Press. First published 1965.
Bernard, Jeff
1991 “Ferruccio Rossi-Landi and a Short History of the Rossi-Landi Network.” Paper presented at the Institute for Socio-Economic Studies, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from [URL].
Bourdieu, Pierre
2000Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Caputo, John D.
1993Against Ethics: Contributions to a Politics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Darwin, Charles
1909On the Origin of Species. New York, NY: P. F. Collier and Son Company. First published 1859.
Deely, John
2008 “From semiosis to semioethics: The full vista of the action of signs.” Sign Systems Studies 361: 437–490.
Deely, John
2009Augustine and Poinsot: The Protosemiotic Development. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.
Deely, John
2013 “Lady Welby and Lady Petrilli.” Semiotica 1961: 13–20.
Eco, Umberto
1976A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Eco, Umberto
1990The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Ellul, Jacques
2012Violence: Reflections from a Christian Perspective. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers. First published in 1969 by Seabury Press.
Neubauer, Deana
2013 “Lady Welby: Significs and the interpretive mind.” Semiotica 1961: 243–260.
Levinas, Emmanuel
1985Ethics and Infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Peirce, Charles S.
1960Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, Charles S.
2014Illustrations of the Logic of Science. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
Petrilli, Susan
2004 “Semioethics, subjectivity, and communication: For the humanism of otherness.” Semiotica 1481: 69–91.
Petrilli, Susan
2009 “Semiotics as semioethics in the era of global communication.” Semiotica 1731: 343–367.
Petrilli, Susan
2011Signifying and Understanding: Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement. Berlin: de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
Petrilli, Susan
2013a “Semioethics and translation as communication in and across genres.” Semiotica 1951: 97–118.
Petrilli, Susan
2013b “Presentation: Two texts at the beginning of a research itinerary. From significs to semioethics.” Semiotica 1961: 513–519.
Petrilli, Susan
2014Sign Studies and Semioethics: Communication, Translation and Values. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Petrilli, Susan
2015a “Language, communication, and speech: Human signs in global semiosis Supplemented by an interview with Thomas A Sebeok.” Semiotica 2041: 173–237.
Petrilli, Susan
2015bVictoria Welby and the Science of Signs. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Petrilli, Susan and Augusto Ponzio
2011 “Transcendence and alterity: On life, communication, and subjectivity.” Semiotica 1841: 229–250.
Ponzio, Augusto
1988 “Rossi-Landi and the Philosophy of Language.” Adriatica.
Ponzio, Augusto
1990Man as a Sign. Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ponzio, Augusto
2013 “Theory of meaning and theory of knowledge: Vailati and Welby” Semiotica 1961: 521–532.
Sebeok, Thomas A. and Danesi, Marcel
2000The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Sebeok, Thomas A.
2001Global Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Sebeok, Thomas A., Susan Petrilli and Augusto Ponzio
2001Semiotica dell’io. Rome: Meltemi editore srl.
Shaw, Bernard
1949Back to Methuselah. New York, NY: Penguin Books, Inc.
Song, Wen
2013 “In search of the other: Reading Victoria Welby’s significs.” Semiotica 1961: 443–455.
Standing, Guy
2011The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. New York, NY: Bloomsburg Academic.
Welby, Victoria
1985Significs and Language: with an introduction by H. W. Schmitz. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Karolak, Hannah
2020. Communication Ethics Literacy and Counterterrorism. In Examining Ethics and Intercultural Interactions in International Relations [Advances in Public Policy and Administration, ], ► pp. 224 ff.
Moser, Keith
2022. Michel Serres’s Biosemiotic Thought: Writing the “Immense Rhapsody” or “Great Story” of Life. In Contemporary French Environmental Thought in the Post-COVID-19 Era [Sustainable Development Goals Series, ], ► pp. 21 ff.
Weigand, Edda
2018. The theory myth. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.