Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 7:2 (2017) ► pp.163–188

A rhetorical change that changed reality

Rouhani vs. Ahmadinejad at the UN

| Wingate Academic College, Netanya (Israel)

This paper is the first to explore the development of Iranian rhetoric from former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the current president Hassan Rouhani, in messages delivered to the international community. The study compares eight speeches given by Ahmadinejad at the UN, to two speeches given on the same platform by Rouhani. The speeches were explored by qualitative research of the prominent rhetorical strategies employed by each president, as well as by quantitative research of the frequently used words in each president’s speeches. The findings reveal a radical change in Iran’s rhetoric since Rouhani succeeded Ahmadinejad in 2013. The newly elected president adopted a moderate, modern and rational discourse regarding both Iran’s attitude to the West and the Iranian nuclear program. The findings suggest that this change made the new president and the “new” Iran possible partners to negotiating with the West, and eventually enabled the historic nuclear deal in 2015.

Keywords: Iran, rhetoric, UN speech, Ahmadinejad, Rouhani, nuclear
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research method
  • 3.Theoretical background
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
    • 4.1The speaker
      • Ahmadinejad speaking as the Iranian president
      • Ahmadinejad speaking as a world leader
      • Ahmadinejad speaking in the name of God
      • Rouhani speaking as the newly elected president
      • Rouhani speaking as a world leader
      • Rouhani speaking as a representative of the Middle East
    • 4.2The addressee
    • 4.3The UN
    • 4.4The West
    • 4.5Iran’s nuclear program and the sanctions
    • 4.6Solutions
  • 5.Quantitative analysis
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 27 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.2.02kay
References
Aristotle
1982 Rhetoric. Trans. John H. Freese. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1986 “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Vern W. McGee (trans.), Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cedroni, Lorella
2013 “Politolinguistics. Towards a New Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. International Workshop, Political Speech 2010, ed. by Isabella Poggi, Francesca D’Errico, Laura Vincze, and Alessandro Vinciarelli, 220–232. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ensink, Titus
1996 “The Footing of a Royal Address: An Analysis of Representativeness in Political Speech, Exemplified in Queen Beatrix’s Address to the Knesset on March 28, 1995.” Current Issues in Language and Society 3 (3): 205–233.Google Scholar
Harris, Melanie
2014 “Leadership Analysis: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.” Journal of Public and International Affairs, 73–87. The Trustees of Princeton University.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis
2000 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Rachel
1988 The Rhetoric of Political Speech in Israel [in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv: Akad Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Beverly and Zohar Livnat
2016 “ ‘Like Everyone Else in the Nation, I Was Also Moved’: Recruitment Strategies in PM Netanyahu’s Hebrew Speeches.” [in Hebrew] Israel Studies in Language and Society 9(1–2): 29–51.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar
2014 “Dialogism in the Political Discourse: Who did Netanyahu Speak to in Bar Ilan Speech?” [in Hebrew] Xelkat Lashon 471: 120–142.Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar and Beverly A. Lewin
2016 “The Interpersonal Strand of Political Speech: Recruiting the Audience in PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speeches.” Language and Dialogue 6(2): 275–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oktar, Lütfiye
2001 “The Ideological Organization of Representational Processes in the Presentation of Us and Them.” Discourse & Society 12 (3): 313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaim
1984 The Kingdom of Rhetoric [in Hebrew]. Hebrew University Jerusalem: Magnus Press.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (1958) Translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1976 A Comprehensive Grammer of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2008 “Analyzing Political Rhetoric.” In Qualitative Discourse in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michal Kryzanowski, 96–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 243–269. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sardabi, Narges, Reza Biria, and Nooshin Azin
2014 “Rouhani’s UN Speech: A Change in Ideology Or Strategy.” International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics World 7(3): 84–97.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2001 “Discourse, Ideology and Context.” Folia Linguistica 35(1–2): 11–40.Google Scholar
2004 “Politics, Ideology and Discourse”. In Encyclopedia of Language and Politics ed. by Ruth Wodak, 728–740. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17 (2): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, John
1990 Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sun, Jing & Zhenqian Liu
2023. Evaluation Mechanism of Political Discourse: A Holistic Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6 ► pp. 2143 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.