Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 7:3 (2017) ► pp.301335
Anward, Jan
2015Doing Language. Linköping: Department of Culture and Communication.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah
1971 [1978]The Life of the Mind. Book One: Thinking. San Diego: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2005 “Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.” Text 251: 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language.” Language Sciences 311: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Michail M.
1968Rabelais and His World. Translated by H. Iswolsky. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Transl. by Carol Emerson and Michael Holquist, edited by Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. A selection of essays from the Russian original “Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva” [1979] Translated by V. McGee, edited by Carol Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen
2007Meeting the Universe Halfway – Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barwise, John and Jon Perry
1983Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bertau, Marie-Cécile, Gonçalves Miguel, and Peter Raggatt
(Eds.) 2012Dialogic Formations: Investigations into the Origins and Development of the Dialogical Self. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael
1987Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandist, Craig and Galin Tihanov
(eds.) 2000Materializing Bakhtin: The Bakhtin Circle and Social Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brannigan, Holly, Martin Pickering, Janet McLean, and Alexandra Cleland
2007 “Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.” Cognition 1041: 163–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal, and Lena Levin
2017 “Starting out as a driver: Progression in instructed pedal work.” In Memory Practices and Learning: Interactional, Institutional and Sociocultural Perspectives, ed. by Mäkitalo, Åsa, Linell, Per and Säljö, Roger, 113–143. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin
1954Die Schriften über das Dialogische Prinzip: Ich und Du [1923], Zwiesprache [1932], Die Frage an den Einzelnen, Elemente des Zwischenmenschlichen [1954] Heidelberg: Schneider.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal
2013 “On Dialogue Studies.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 11: 9–28.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron
1968The Social Organization of Juvenile Evidence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
1981 “Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis.” In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-sociologies, ed. by Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Cicourel, Aaron, 51–80. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Robin
2005Type Theory with Records. University of Gothenburg. Ms.Google Scholar
Cowley, Stephen
(ed.) 2011Distributed Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowley, Stephen, João Major, Sune V. Steffensen, and Alfredo Dinis
(Eds.) 2010Signifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health. Braga: The Faculty of Philosophy of Braga.Google Scholar
De Boer, Bart
2011 “Self-organization and language evolution.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (e-book), ed. by Talleman, Maggie and Gibson, Kathleen. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John and Arthur Bentley
1949Knowing and the Known. Boston.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage
(Eds.) 1992Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, Jack
2014 “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 251: 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Carol
1997The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Yrjö
2008From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad, Ulrike Lüdtke, Timothy Racine, and Jordan Zlatev
François, Frédéric
1994Morale et mise en mots. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun
2011 “Interpretations of embodied cognition.” In The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, ed. by Tschacher, T. and Bergomi, C., 59–71. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
2002Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Edited and introduced by A. W. Rawls. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gibson, James
1979The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alex and Flora Cornish
2009 “Intersubjectivity: Towards a Dialogical Analysis.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 401: 19–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan
2009The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. London: King’s College.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan and Massimo Poesio
2016 “Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction.” Frontiers in Psychology 71: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2011 “Contextures of Action.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles and LeBaron, Curtis, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2017Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Grice 1975. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossen, Michèle
2010 “Interaction analysis and psychology. A dialogical perspective!Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 441: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, 31: Speech Acts, ed. by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, Wolfgang Imo, and Jörg Bücker
(Eds.) 2014Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1981Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli and Margret Selting
Harris, Roy
1997 “From an integrationist point of view.” In Linguistics Inside Out: Roy Harris and His Critics, ed. by Wolf, George and Nigel Love, 229–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian
2013The Dynamics of Auction: Social Interaction and the Sale of Fine Art and Antiques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Steven Clayman
2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. New York: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Douglas Maynard
(eds.) 2006Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primare Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Hubert and Harry Kempen
1993The Dialogical Self. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert and Agnieszka Hermans-Konopka
2010Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko and Jack Kalus
1985Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Bert, Sune V. Steffensen, and Jim Martin
2012 “Caring, conversing, and realizing values: new directions in language studies.” Language Sciences 341: 499–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeyer, Jesper
2010 “A biosemiotic approach to health.” In Signifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health, ed. by Cowley, Stephen, Major, João, Steffensen, Sune V. and Dinis, Alfredo, 21–41. Braga: The Faculty of Philosophy of Braga.Google Scholar
Holquist, Michael
1986 “Introduction.” In Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. A selection of essays from the Russian original “Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva” [1979] Translated by V. McGee, edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1990Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundsnurscher, Franz
1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” In Akten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongress Basel 1980, ed. by Rupp, Heinz and Roloff, Hans-Gert, 89–95. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
2013 “The cultural ecosystem of human cognition.” Philosophical Psychology, 1–16.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, Sandra
2007Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010 “Bodily quoting in dance correction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 431: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, and Dov Gabbay
2001Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin
2017 “Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 501: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leontiev, Aleksei N.
1981 “The problem of activity in psychology.” In The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology ed. by Wertsch, James, 37–71. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel
1969Totality and Infinity. Translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Ligorio, Beatrice and Margarida César
(Eds.) 2013Interplays between Dialogical Learning and Dialogical Self. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, Peter MacNeilage, and Michael Studdert-Kennedy
1984 “Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals.” In Explanation for Language Universals, ed. by Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard and Dahl, Östen, 181–203. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindwall, Oskar and Anna Ekström
2011 “Instruction‐in‐Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of a Manual Skill.” Human Studies 351: 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
2013 “The dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building: processes and resources.” In Units of Talk – Units of Actions, ed. by Szczepek Reed, Beatrice and Raymond, Geoffrey, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Dialogism and the Distributed Language Approach: A rejoinder to Steffensen.” Language Sciences 501: 120–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Self-other interdependences in dialogue.” In Self and Other in Dialogue, ed. by Gille, Johan and Norén, Coco, 7–29. Pieterlen, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Linell, Per, Lennart Gustavsson, and Päivi Juvonen
1988 “Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: A presentation of initiative-response analysis.” Linguistics, 261: 415–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per and Ivana Marková
2014Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
2012 “Alles Soziale besteht aus verschiedenen Niveaus der Objektivierung.” Ein Gespräch mit Thomas Luckmann. In Sozialität in Slow Mootion: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven, ed. by Ayass, Ruth and Meyer, Christian, 21–39. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Luff, Paul, Jon Hindmarsh, and Christian Heath
(eds.) 2000Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mäkitalo, Åsa and Roger Säljö
2002Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. Text 221: 57–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marková, Ivana
2003Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006 “On «the inner alter» in dialogue.” International Journal for Dialogical Science, 11: 125–147.Google Scholar
2014 “Complementarity as epistemology of life.” In Culture Psychology and Its Future: Complementarity in a New Key, ed. by Wagoner, Brady, Chaudhary, Nandita and Hviid, Pernille, 33–50. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
2016The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marková, Ivana and Klaus Foppa
(eds.) 1990The Dynamics of Dialogue. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1991Asymmetries of Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Marková, Ivana and Alex Gillespie
(eds.) 2008Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
(eds.) 2012Trust and Conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marková, Ivana, Carl F. Graumann, and Klaus Foppa
(eds.) 1995Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marková, Ivana, Per Linell, Michèle Grossen, and Anne Salazar Orvig
2007Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathrin
2004 From other to self. Learning as Interactional Change. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Märtsin, Mariann, Brady Wagoner, Emma-Louise Aveling, Irini Kadianaki, and Lisa Whittaker
(eds.) 2012Dialogicality in Focus: Challenges to Theory, Method and Application. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto and Francisco Varela
1980Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matusov, Eugene
2001Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Mercer, Neil
1995The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
1964 “The philosopher and his shadow.” In Signs, ed. by Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 159–81. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian, Jürgen Streeck, and Scott Jordan
(eds.) 2017Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2013 “Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction.” In Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives. (linguae and litterae, 24), ed. by Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, 247–275. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo Rommetveit 1974Google Scholar
Morson, Gary and Carol Emerson
1990Mikhail Bakhtin. Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge
2000Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology, ed. by Gerald Duveen. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2008Psychoanalysis: Its Image and its Public. Translated by David Macey. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Noë, Alva
2004Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson
1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Sarah Bro
2015The Cognitive Ecology of Human Errors in Emergency Medicine: An Interactivity-Based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin and Simon Garrod
2004 “Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271: 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “How tightly are production and comprehension interwoven?Frontiers in Psychology 41: Article 238 (April 2013). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poesio, Massimo and Hannes Rieser
2010 “Competions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue.” Dialogue and Discourse 11: 1–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1996Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul
1998Writing/disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul and Jody Shipka
2003 “Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literateactivity.” In Writing Selves/ Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, ed. by Bazerman, Charles and Russell, David, 180–238. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar
1974On Message Structure. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael and Alfredo Jornet
2014 “Toward a Theory of Experience.” Science Education 981: 106–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, M. Schelling, and Christian Rubattel
1985L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation. Vols. I-II1. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, Anne
1999Les mouvements du discourse. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant and Celia Roberts
(Eds.) 1999Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1992 “Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 951: 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 “Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Thompson, Sandra, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, Sune Vork
2013 “Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild.” In Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice, ed. by Cowley, Stephen and Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric, 195–221. Dordrect: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron
(Eds.) 2011Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice and Raymond Geoffrey
(eds.) 2013Units of Talk – Units of Actions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallis, Raymond
2011Aping Mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity. (Acumen) New printing (2014): London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael
1964Der Andere: Studien zur Sozialontologie der Gegenwart. (New edition, Berlin: de Gruyter 1965).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn
1979 “Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity.” In Before Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Bullowa, Margaret, 321–347. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valsiner, Jaan
2014An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. Los Angeles, etc: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vice, Susan
1997Introducing Bakhtin. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev
1987Thinking and Speech. Edited and translated by N. Minick. Russian original [1934] New York and London: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wegerif, Rupert
2007Dialogic, Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. New York and Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “How to verify a theory of dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 61: 349–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “IADA history: The unity of dialogue and its multiple faces.” Language and Dialogue 71: 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Ethics in Dialogue: Ideals and reality.” In Dialogic Ethics, ed. by Arnett, Ronald and Cooren, François. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, James
1985Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1998Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wieder, Lawrence
1974Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling the Convict Code. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2013 “The mimesis hierarchy of semiotic development: Five stages of intersubjectivity in children.” Public Journal of Semiotices 41: 47–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Botaș, Adina
Cowley, Stephen J. & Anneliese Kuhle
2020. The rise of languaging. Biosystems 198  pp. 104264 ff. DOI logo
Dollar, Natalie J.
2021. Engaging contested community issues. Language and Dialogue 11:1  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Druzhinin, Andrey S., Tom Scholte & Tatiana A. Fomina
Foolen, Ad
2019. Quo vadis pragmatics? From adaptation to participatory sense-making. Journal of Pragmatics 145  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Alex & Alex Gillespie
2023. Textual Indicators of Deliberative Dialogue: A Systematic Review of Methods for Studying the Quality of Online Dialogues. Social Science Computer Review 41:6  pp. 2364 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2023. Dialogue and dialogic perspectives on actions, interactions and practices across contexts. Journal of Pragmatics 203  pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Lantz-Andersson, Annika, Ewa Skantz-Åberg, Apostolia Roka, Mona Lundin & Pia Williams
2022. Teachers' collaborative reflective discussions on technology-mediated teaching: Envisioned and enacted transformative agency. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 35  pp. 100645 ff. DOI logo
Leskinen, Kirsi
2023. Refugee-background students negotiating academic literacy practices in L2: a dialogical and nexus analytical approach. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 11:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Linell, Per
2018. Dialogism is an integrationism. Language and Dialogue 8:2  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Delin
2022. Review of Pickering & Garrod (2021): Understanding Dialogue: Language Use and Social Interaction. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 23:2  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Mustajoki, Arto, Tatiana Sherstinova & Ulla Tuomarla
2018. Types and functions of pseudo-dialogues. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Rapanta, Chrysi, Andrea Miralda-Banda, Mercè Garcia-Milà, Maria Vrikki, Fabrizio Macagno & Maria Evagorou
2023. Detecting the factors affecting classroom dialogue quality. Linguistics and Education 77  pp. 101223 ff. DOI logo
Rinholm, Hanne, Ida Heiberg Solem & Inger Ulleberg
2023. Dialogues in education: Exploring cases from music and mathematics education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 11:1  pp. A60 ff. DOI logo
Ro, Eunseok & Hanbyul Jung
2022. “Aratda!”: Intersubjectivity-in-action in a multilingual Korean reality TV show. Journal of Pragmatics 201  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Simonsen, Line Maria
2021. Hybrid presence: Integrating interprofessional interactions with digital consultations. Nordicom Review 42:s4  pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Soukup, Barbara
2020. Survey area selection in Variationist Linguistic Landscape Study (VaLLS). Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 6:1  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Trasmundi, Sarah Bro & Per Linell
2017. Insights and their emergence in everyday practices. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:1  pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Weigand, Edda
2018. The theory myth. Language and Dialogue 8:2  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Guocai
2021. Repetition in Mandarin-speaking children’s dialogs: its distribution and structural dimensions. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.