Article published in:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 7:3 (2017) ► pp. 360386


Agyekum, Kofi
2002 “Menstruation as a Verbal Taboo among the Akan.” Journal of Anthropological Research 58: 367–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Honorifics and Status Indexing in Akan Communication.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24(5): 369–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Aspects of Persuasion in Akan Communication.” International Journal of Language and Communication RASK 21: 63–96.Google Scholar
2005 “The Pragmatics of Requests in Akan Communication.” Legon Journal of Humanities 16: 1–26.Google Scholar
[ p. 385 ]
2010Akan Verbal Taboos in the Context of the Ethnography of Communication. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
2013Introduction to Literature. 3rd edition. Accra: Adwinsa Publishers.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Elite Olshtain
1984 “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)”. Applied Linguistics 5(3): 196–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolatito, Ojenike
2012 “Linkage between Persuasion Principles and advertising.” New Media and Mass Communication 8: 7–11.Google Scholar
Bonvillain, Nancy
1993Language, Culture and Communication: The Meanings of Messages. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Braun-Latour, Kathryn. A. and Gerald Zaltman
2006 “Memory Change: An Intimate Measure of Persuasion”. Journal of Advertising Research 46(1): 57–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan D.
2004Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
El-daly, Hosney M.
2011 “Towards an Understanding of the Discourse of Advertising: Review of Research with Special Reference to the Egyptian Media.” African Nebula 3: 25–47.Google Scholar
Ghana Statistical Service
2000Population and Housing Census (PHC) of Ghana.Google Scholar
Grein, Marion
2007 “The Speech Act of Refusal within the Minimal Action Game: A Comparative Study of German and Japanese.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 1–19. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Ralph. E.
2011Mass Communication: Living in a Media World. 3rd edition. Washington DC: CQ Press (SAGE).Google Scholar
Jamieson, G. Harry
1985Communication and Persuasion. London/Sydney: Croom Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. C.
2006 “Deixis.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward, 97–121. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mikolajczak-Degrauwe, Kalina and Malaika Brengman
2014 “The Influence of Advertising on Compulsive Buying – The Role of Persuasion Knowledge”. Journal of Behavioural Addictions 3(1): 65–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olátéjú, Adesola
2009 “Jèdí Ò M’Akòwé (Haemorrhoid Respects Not Even the Educated Elite): A Sociolinguistic-Stylistic Analysis of the Language of Yorùbá Herbal Medicine Practitioners.” In Selected Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. by Akinloye Ojo and Lioba Moshi, 156–165. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Pearson, Judy C., Paul E. Nelson, Scott Titsworth and Lynn Harter
2003Human Communication. New York: McGraw Hill Publishers.Google Scholar
Rapaille, Clotaire
2007The Culture Code: An Ingenious Way to Understand why People Around the World Buy and Live as they do. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Russo, Edward J. and Anne-Sophie Chaxel
2010 “How Persuasive Messages can Influence Behavior without Awareness.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 20: 338–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 386 ]
2009Language as Dialogue: From Rules of Principles of Probability. Sebastian Feller (ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a “Language as Dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7(3): 505–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bDialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012a “Professional Action Games: Theory and Practice.” In Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Stanca Măda and Răzvan Săftoiu, 43–59. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “The Challenge of Complexity: Body, Mind and Language in Interaction.” In Moving Ourselves, Moving Others, Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, ed. by Ad Foolen, Ulrike M. Lüdtke, Timothy P. Racine and Jordan Zlatev, 383–406. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Persuasion or the Integration of Grammar and Rhetoric.” In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue ed. by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda, 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar