Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Styles, Standards and Meaning in Lesser-Studied Languages
Edited by Uri Horesh, Jonathan R. Kasstan and Miriam Meyerhoff
[Language Ecology 4:1] 2020
► pp. 1–16
Introduction

Styles, standards and meaning

Issues in the globalisation of sociolinguistics

| University of Oxford
| University of Rochester
| Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
| Achva Academic College
| University of Westminster
| University of Auckland
| University of Canterbury
Style, in the study of variation and change, is intimately linked with broader questions about linguistic innovation and change, standards, social norms, and individual speakers’ stances. This article examines style when applied to lesser-studied languages. Style is both (i) the product of speakers’ choices among variants, and (ii) something reflexively produced through the association of variants and the social position of the users of those variants. In the context of the languages considered here, we ask “What questions do we have about variation in this language and what notion(s) of style will answer them?” We highlight methodological, conceptual and analytical challenges for the notion of style as it is usually operationalised in variationist sociolinguistics. We demonstrate that style is a useful research heuristic which – when marshalled alongside locally-oriented accounts of, or proxies for “standard” and “prestige”, in apparent time – allows us to describe language and explore change. It is also a means for exploring social meaning, which speakers may have more or less conscious control over.
Keywords: style variation, language standards, minority languages, sociolinguistic theory, superposed variety, indicators, markers, stereotypes
Article outline
  • Style and lesser-studied languages
  • Style as a heuristic tool
  • Meanings of styles
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.00006.mey
References (53)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Wer, Enam, Uri Horesh, Deema AlAmmar, Hind Alaodini, Aziza Al-Essa, Areej Al-Hawamdeh, Khairia Al-Qahtani and Abeer Ab Hussain. 2020. Probing linguistic change in Arabic vernaculars: A sociohistorical perspective. Language in Society. FirstView. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel. 2013. Hyperstyle variation in French: Yet another exception culturelle? In Mari C. Jones and David Hornsby (eds.), Language and Social Structure in Urban France. Oxford: Legenda, pp. 81–91.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty. 2017. From Drag Queens to Leathermen: Language, gender, and gay male subcultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 131:145–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Succeeding waves: Seeking sociolinguistic theory for the twenty-first century. In: Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 391–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, Tucker, Jeff Good and Alice Mitchell. 2014. Beyond the ancestral code: Towards a model for sociolinguistic language documentation. Language Documentation and Conservation. 81: 168–191.Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri, David Vinson and Eleni Orfanidou. 2012. First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgement in British Sign Language. Cognition 1241: 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang and Ruth Wodak-Leodolter. 1977. Language preservation and language death in Brittany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121: 33–44.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 411: 87–100.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logo
. 2018. Meaning and Linguistic Variation: The third wave in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and William Labov. 2017. Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(4): 467–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1968. The speech community. International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, vol. 91, pp. 381–386. Reprinted as Ch. 7 of John J. Gumperz 1971. Language in Social Groups, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 114–128.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Dell Hymes (eds). 1964a. The Ethnography of Communication. Special edition of American Anthropologist 66 No. 6 Pt.2.Google Scholar
(eds.). 1964b. Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. 1987. Male/female differences in speech: An alternative explanation. In Keith M. Dennig, Sharon Inkelas, Faye C. McNair-Knox and John R. Rickford (eds.). Variation in Language: NWAV-X. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics. 173–182.Google Scholar
. 2000. Form and ideology: Arabic sociolinguistics and beyond. Annual Review of Anthropology 291: 61–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. 2016. Sociolinguistic Styles. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Muhammad H. 1986. Standard and prestige language: A problem in Arabic sociolinguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 281:115–126.Google Scholar
Laberge, Suzanne and Gillian Sankoff. 1986. Anything you can do. In Gillian Sankoff (ed.). The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 271–293.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2015. The discovery of the unexpected. Asia Pacific Language Variation 1(1): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. and Andrée Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez and Isabelle Buchstaller. 2015. Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change 271: 319–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa and Umberto Ansaldo. 2015. Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1999. Is sociolinguistics lacking in style? Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 81:9–33.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic Hitchhiker’s guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(2): 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2016. Methods, innovations and extensions: Reflections on half a century of methodology in social dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4): 431–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam and James N. Stanford. 2015. “Tings change, all tings change”: the changing face of sociolinguistics with a global perspective. In Dick Smakman and Patrick Heinrich (eds.), Globalising Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 2018. Linguistic attitudes and contact effects in Toronto’s heritage languages: A variationist sociolinguistic investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism 221:429–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Prodrop in Heritage Cantonese and Korean is not influenced by English contact. Paper presented at NWAV Asia-Pacific 6, National University of Singapore, 17–21 February 2021.
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In: Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–358.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1891. Principles of the History of Language. [Trans. H. A. Strong] London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2000. The phonetic grounding of phonology. Bulletin de la communication parlée 51:7–23.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2008. Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum 511 (Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society – Austin 15), pp 1–14.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. and Penelope Eckert. 2001. Introduction. In Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso. Fc. The role of social meaning in contact-induced variation among new speakers of Basque. Journal of Sociolinguistics.
Sankoff, Gillian. 2019. Language change across the lifespan: Three trajectory types. Language 95(2): 197–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Suzanne Evans Wagner. 2020. The long tail of language change: A trend and panel study of Québecois French futures. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 651: 246–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Satyanath, Shobha. 2017. Kohima: Language variation and change in a small but diverse city in India. In Dick Smakman and Patrick Heinrich (eds.) Urban Sociolinguistics: The city as a linguistic process and experience. London: Routledge, pp.121–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 231: 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starr, Rebecca Lurie, Tianxiao Wang and Christian Go. 2020. Sexuality vs. sensuality: The multimodal construction of affective stance in ASMR performances. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24(4): 492–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, James A. 2010. Variation in Linguistic Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 95–195.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2013. Individual differences in socio-cognitive processing and sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.) Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Hui. 2021. Enregisterment, variation and identity construction in Ningbo Putonghua. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation–Asia Pacific 6. National University of Singapore. 17–20 February 2021.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Mayeux, Oliver
2024. Racial segregation and language variation in Louisiana Creole: Social meaning in language loss. Sociolinguistica 38:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Duhamel, Marie-France
2022. The role of older men in a phonological change. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 8:2 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Povilonis, Natalie & Gregory Guy
2022. Authenticity in language ideology. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 8:2 ► pp. 240 ff. DOI logo
Rodriguez-Ordoñez, Itxaso, Jonathan Kasstan & Bernadette O’Rourke
2022. Responding to sociolinguistic change: New speakers and variationist sociolinguistics. International Journal of Bilingualism 26:5 ► pp. 529 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.