Typological approaches involving the study of Creole languages have long triggered an unsettled dispute among creolists. Some claim that Creoles do not differ from non-Creole languages, and can only be defined socio-historically and not structurally, while others claim that Creoles are ʺdistinctʺ in many respects, and/or form a special class with specific typological properties. In an attempt to settle this dispute, Bakker et al. (2011) drew on a phylogenetic approach to provide evidence that Creoles form a structurally distinguishable subgroup within the world’s languages. However, their methods and conclusions appear to be questionable, as they are likely to be flawed. Standing as a challenge to the aforementioned article, this paper will reconsider their methodological and empirical approaches by re-evaluating the sets of Creoles and non-Creoles on the basis of identical or near-identical principles. It will ultimately appear that their conclusion could be an artefact of the selection as well.
To appear. A null theory of Creole formation, based on Universal Grammar. In Ian Roberts ed. The Oxford Handbook on Universal Grammar New York Oxford University Press
Ansaldo, Umberto
2004Contact, typology and the speaker: The essentials of language. Language Sciences 261: 485–494.
Ansaldo, Umberto and Stephen Matthews
2007Deconstructing creole: The rationale. In Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews and Lisa Lim, eds. Deconstructing Creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–18.
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall and Ingo Plag
1992Split-decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11 : 242–252.
Benveniste, Emile
1993 [1966]Problèmes de linguistique générale, I1. Paris : Gallimard.
Bickerton, Derek
1975Dynamics of a Creole System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bickerton, Derek
1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers, Inc.
Bickerton, Derek and Talmy Givón
1976Pidginization and language change: From SXV and VSX to SVX. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker and Salikoko S. Mufwene, eds. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago. 9–39.
Binger, Louis-Gustave
1886Essai sur la langue Bambara, parlée dans le Kaarta et dans le Bélédougou, suivi d'un vocabulaire. Paris: Maisonneuve Frères et Ch. Leclerc.
1875A Grammar of the Asante and Fante Language called Tshi: Based on the Akuapem Dialect with Reference to the Other (Akan and Fante) Dialects. Basel: Basel Evangelical Missionary Society.
DeGraff, Michel
2001Morphology in Creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology. In Michael Kenstowicz, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press.
DeGraff, Michel
2003Against Creole Exceptionalism. Language 79(2): 391–410.
DeGraff, Michel
2005Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society 34(4): 533–591.
Everett, Dan
1986Pirahã. In Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum, eds. Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 11. Berlin: Moutin de Gruyter. 200–325.
Fon Sing, Guillaume, Jean Leoue and Corinna Bartoletti
2011Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Paper presented at the GRGC Workshop 2011, Creole Grammars – Linguistic Theories. Paris 23–24June 2011.
Fon Sing, Guillaume and Jean Leoue
2012Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Paper presented at the 9th Creolistics Workshop, Contact languages in a global context: Past and present. Aarhus University, Denmark 11–13April 2012.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
and Adrian C. Edwards2005A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Givón, Talmy
1973The time-axis phenomenon. Language 491: 890–925.
Hancock, Ian
1987A preliminary classification of the anglophone Atlantic creoles with syntactic data from thirty-three representative dialects. In Glenn Gilbert, ed. Pidgin and Creole Languages: Essays in Memory of John E. Reineck. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. 264–333.
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie
eds.2005The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heath, Jeffrey
1998A Grammar of Koyra Chiini: The Songhay of Timbuktu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2006Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23(2): 254–267.
Kay, Paul and Gillian Sankoff
1974A language-universals approach to pidgins and creoles. In David DeCamp and Ian F. Hancock, eds. Pidgins and Creoles: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 46–84.
Li, Charles
and Sandra A. Thompson1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Maia, António da Silva
1964Lições de gramática de quimbundo: portugês e banto, dialecto omumbuim. Cucujães: Escola Tipográfica.
Maslova, Elena
2003A Grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Markey, T.L.
1982Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole?Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 491: 169–207.
Maurer, Philippe
1995L’Angolar, un Créole Afro-Portugais parlé à São Tomé. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
McWhorter, John H.
1998Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74(4): 788–818.
McWhorter, John H.
2001The world's simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2/3): 125–166. With peer commentaries: 167–387.
McWhorter, John H.
2005Defining Creole. New York: Oxford University Press.
1977Language change in childhood and in history. In John Macnamara, ed. Language Learning and Thought. Academic Press. 185–214.
Sneddon, James N.
1996Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Taylor, Douglas
1956Language contact in the West Indies. Word 121: 391–414.
Traugott, E.C.
1977Pidginization, creolization, and language change. In A. Valdman, ed. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 70–98.
Troubetzkoy N.S.
1939Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague. [Trad. Fr. 1947, Principes de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck].
Véronique, Daniel
2009 Review of John Holm and Peter L. Patrick, eds. Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. Journal of Language Contact – VARIA 21: 153–157.
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Aboh, Enoch O.
2017. The emergence of hybrid grammars: A rejoinder to Peter Bakker. <i>WORD</i> 63:3 ► pp. 207 ff.
Aboh, Enoch O. & Michel DeGraff
2022. Perspectives on Creole Formation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 257 ff.
Ansaldo, Umberto
2018. Complexity reboot: A rejoinder to Parkvall, Bakker and McWhorter. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 234 ff.
Barrière, Isabelle, Blandine Joseph, Katsiaryna Aharodnik, Sarah Kresh, Guetjens Prince Fleurio, Géraldine Legendre & Thierry Nazzi
2022. Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 255 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.