Article published in:
Language Ecology
Vol. 3:1 (2019) ► pp. 89–119

Creole typology is analytic typology

| University of Hong Kong
| University of Chicago
| University of Hong Kong | University of Sydney
This paper reviews a number of specific features typical of analytic languages, in an attempt to investigate whether Creole languages can indeed be grouped, at least structurally, with other languages of the analytic (or isolating) type. Based on Sybesma et al. (forthcoming), a study of the nature of analyticity, we select eight features which constitute rather obvious structural parallels between two unrelated groups, namely Sinitic and Kwa. In terms of Creole languages, these eight features can be also clearly located within the APiCS (Michaelis et al. 2013). Contrary to works like Bakker et al. (2011) which argue for the existence of a “Creole Prototype”, our results show that Creole languages do not cluster with each other against other non-Creole languages. Instead, various Creoles clearly owe their grammatical profile to the languages that dominate the typological environment in which they are formed.
Keywords: analytic language, Creole, linguistic complexity, phylogenetic network, Kwa, Sinitic
Published online: 12 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.17003.sze
References

References

Aboh, Enoch O.
2010 The morphosyntax of the noun phrase. In Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds. Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 11–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(2): 400–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 114 ]
Aboh, Enoch O. and Michel DeGraff
2014 Some notes on bare nouns in Haitian creole and in Gungbe: A transatlantic Sprachbund perspective. In Tor A. Åfalí and Brit Mæhlum, eds. The Sociolinguistics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 203–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 A null theory of Creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In Ian Roberts, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 401–458.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. and James Essegbey
2010 General properties of the clause. In Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds. Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 39–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. and Norval Smith
2012 The morphosyntax of non-iconic reduplications: A case study in Eastern Gbe and the Surinam creoles. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 27–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Hertz
2012 Reduplication beyond the word level: A cross-linguistic view. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K.
2008 Aspect and modality in Ewe: A survey. In Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 135–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu
2008 Imperfective constructions: Progressive and prospective in Ewe and Dangme. In Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 215–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto
2009 Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Contact and Asian varieties of English. In Raymond Hickey, ed. The Handbook of Language Contact. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. 498–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Sri Lanka Malay and its Lankan abstrates. In Claire Lefebvre, ed. Creoles, Their Substrates, and Language Typology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 367–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall and Ingo Plag
2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse and Jacqueline Guéron
eds. 2007 Noun Phrases in Creole Languages: A Multi-Faceted Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
1984 The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2): 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis and Martin Haspelmath
2017 Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour 1: 723–729. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brousseau, Anne-Marie
1988 Triptyque sur les composés: les noms composés en français, fongbe et haïtien en regard des notions de tête et de percolation. Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien 2: 1–109.Google Scholar
[ p. 115 ]
Bryant, David and Vincent Moulton
2004 Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2): 255–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
2008 Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12(1): 45–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
1994 The factive construction in Kwa. Ms. Cornell University.Google Scholar
1997 Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 461–497.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric
2013 First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 274–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dede, Keith
2007 The deep end of the feature pool: Syntactic hybridization in Chinese dialects. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 35(1): 58–80.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel
2007 Kreyòl or Haitian Creole. In John Holm and Peter L. Patrick, eds. Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge. 101–126.Google Scholar
Essegbey, James
1999 Inherent Complement Verbs Revisited: Towards an Understanding of Argument Structure in Ewe. PhD thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
2008 The potential morpheme in Ewe. In Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 195–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fattier, Dominique
2013 Haitian Creole. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 195–204.Google Scholar
Fon Sing, Guillaume
2017 Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Language Ecology 1(1): 44–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gil, David
2009 How Much grammar does it take to sail a boat? In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil and Peter Trudgill, eds. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 19–33.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glaude, Herby and Anne Zribi-Hertz
2012 Verb focus in Haitian: From lexical reiteration to Predicate Cleft. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, Diana
2011 The Syntax and Semantics of a Determiner System: A Case Study of Mauritian Creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holm, John
2007 Creole typology and substrate typology. Presentation at the Symposium on Language Contact and the Dynamics of Language: Theory and Implications: Max Planck Institute, Germany, May 10–13.
Holm, John and Peter L. Patrick
eds. 2007 Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Yafei Li
2009 The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huson, Daniel H. and David Bryant
2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2): 254–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 116 ]
Larson, Martha
2010 The Empty Subject construction: Verb serialization in Baule. In Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds. Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 195–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire
1998 Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of Grammar: The Case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2010 On the relevance of Pidgins and Creoles in the debate on the origins of language. Presentation at the Summer Institute on The Origins of Language: Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada, June 21–30.
Lefebvre, Claire and Anne-Marie Brousseau
2002 A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa
2007 Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 27(4): 446–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa and Umberto Ansaldo
2006 Keeping Kirinda vital: The endangerment-empowerment dilemma in the documentation of Sri Lanka Malay. In Enoch O. Aboh and Miriam van Staden, eds. ACLC (Amsterdam Centre for Language & Communication) Working Papers 1: 51–66.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol
1974 Causative constructions in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 5: 195–204.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-kwong
1990 Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manfredi, Victor
1991 Agbo and Ehugbo: Igbo Linguistic Consciousness, its Origins and Limits. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2010 Romani in Britain: The Afterlife of a Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Philippe and the APiCS Consortium
2013a Tense-aspect systems. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 192–195.Google Scholar
2013b Tone. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 480–483.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H.
2011 Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why do Languages Undress? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber
eds. 2013 The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael
2008 The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson, eds. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 265–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfänder, Stefan
2013 Guyanais. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220–228.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah Julianne
1998 The role of diffusion in the genesis of Hawaiian creole. Language 74(1): 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 117 ]
Schwegler, Armin
1990 Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Palenquero. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 182–192.Google Scholar
Stewart, Osamuyimen
2001 The Serial Verb Construction Parameter. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Su, Lily I-wen
2004 Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Studies in Linguistics 30(1): 19–40.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint, Enoch O. Aboh, Umberto Ansaldo and Lisa L. S. Cheng
forthcoming). Analyticity: A Comparison of Sinitic and Kwa. Unpublished draft.
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Umberto Ansaldo and Stephen Matthews
2018 Typological variation across Mandarin dialects: An areal perspective with a quantitative approach. Linguistic Typology 22(2): 233–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jian
2015 Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: A typological perspective. In Hilary M. Chappell, ed. Diversity in Sinitic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110–133.Google Scholar
Xu, Dan
2014 甘青一帶的賓格標記及其類型學上的意義 Gānqīng yīdài de bīngé biājì jí qí lèixíngxué shàng de yìyì [Accusative case marking in the Gansu-Qinghai region and its significance on typological studies]. In Che Wah Ho and Shengli Feng, eds. 承繼與拓新：漢語語言文字學研究 Chéngjì yǔ tuòxīn: Hànyǔ yǔyán wénzìxué yánjiū [Inheritance and Innovations: Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Philology]. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press. 494–514.Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi
2012 Reiteration in Pichi: Forms, functions and areal-typological perspectives. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 251–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Pichi. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 194–205.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Szeto, Pui Yiu & Chingduang Yurayong
2021. Sinitic as a typological sandwich: revisiting the notions of Altaicization and Taicization. Linguistic Typology 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.