Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Ecology
Vol. 3:1 (2019) ► pp.3–27

On the relevance of voice quality in contact varieties

Non-modal phonation type in Afro-Yungueño Spanish

| University of Zurich
| University of Zurich
This paper focuses on the role of voice quality variation in the system of a contact language, Afro-Yungueño Spanish, a restructured variety of Spanish spoken in the Bolivian Yungas valleys. Based on case studies of naturally occurring conversation between multiple speakers, we show that certain non-modal phonation types, in this case falsetto and breathy voice, are used to index expressiveness, intensification, or emphasis. We argue that these practices have discursive meaning that could otherwise also be encoded by means of grammatical and lexical resources, and that they are an integral part of the linguistic system of this variety. We claim that these practices may have resulted from the specific socio-historical context in which this variety evolved. This suggests that voice quality and ecological factors should not be underestimated in order to reach a more complete picture of how meaning is conveyed in apparently simplified contact languages.
Keywords: Afro-Yungueño Spanish, Afro-Bolivians, falsetto, breathy voice quality, language ecology, simplicity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Voice quality and prosody in language contact
  • 3.Afro-Yungueño Spanish
  • 4.Terminology and data
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Falsetto
    • 5.2Breathy voice
  • 6.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.18010.per
References (67)
References
Babel, Anna M. 2010. Contact and Contrast in Valley Spanish. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2008. Pidgins versus creoles versus Pidgincreoles. In Silvia Kouwenberg and John Victor Singler, eds. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. Oxford: Blackwell. 130–157.Google Scholar
. 2009. Phonological complexity in Pidgins. In Nicholas Faraclas and Thomas B. Klein, eds. Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins. London: Battlebridge. 7–27.Google Scholar
Blount, Ben G. and Elise J. Padgug. 1977. Prosodic, paralinguistic, and interactional features in parent-child speech: English and Spanish. Journal of Child Language 4(1): 67–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonnie, Richard J. 2011. The Segmental Features of Ghanaian English Pronunciation: A Description of Usage at the Mesolectal Level. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of Ghana.Google Scholar
Bruyn, Adrienne. 2008. Grammaticalization in pidgins and creoles. In Silvia Kouwenberg and John Victor Singler, eds. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. London: Blackwell. 385–410.Google Scholar
Campbell, Nick and Parham Mokhtari. 2003. Voice quality: The 4th prosodic dimension. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: ICPhS. 2417–2420.Google Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy and Shelome Gooden, eds. 2011. Language Change in Contact Languages: Grammatical and Prosodic Considerations. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colton, Raymond H. and Harry Hollien. 1973. Perceptual differentiation of the modal and falsetto registers. Folia Phoniatrica 251: 270–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric and Peter Bakker. 2017. Typology of Creole languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 254–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society 341: 533–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H. and Jerold A. Edmondson. 2011. Acoustical analysis of voice quality for sociophonetic purposes. In Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, eds. Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London and New York: Routledge. 131–148.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 2009. Suprasegmentals and the myth of the simplicity continuum from ‘Pidgin’, to ‘Creole’, to ‘natural languages’. In Nicholas Faraclas and Thomas B. Klein, eds. Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins. London: Battlebridge. 29–47.Google Scholar
Ferrand, Carole T. 2002. Harmonics-to-noise ratio: An index of vocal aging. Journal of Voice 16(4): 480–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A. 1997. Anthropological Linguistics. An Introduction. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garrett, Paul B. 2006. Contact languages as endangered languages: What is there to lose? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21(1): 175–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, David. 2006. How complex are isolating languages? In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki, and Fred Karlsson, eds. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 109–132.Google Scholar
Gobl, Christer and Ailbhe Ní Chasaide. 2003. The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication 401: 189–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Good, Jeff. 2004. Tone and accent in Saramaccan: Charting a deep split in the phonology of a language. Lingua 114: 575–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew and Peter Ladefoged. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 291: 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grivičić, Tamara and Chad Nilep. 2004. When phonation matters: The use and function of yeah and creaky voice. Colorado Research in Linguistics 17(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1992. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In Martin Pütz, ed. Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 59–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henton, Caroline G. and R. A. W. Bladon. 1985. Breathiness in normal female speech: Inefficiency versus desirability. Language and Communication 5(3): 221–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Navarro, Antonio. 2011. Humor, prosodia e intensificación pragmática en la conversación coloquial española. VERBA 381: 271–292.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala, eds. 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio and Armin Schwegler. 2008. Intonation in Palenquero. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, Christine. 2008. The cultural in Pidgin genesis. In Silvia Kouwenberg and John V. Singler, eds. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. London: Wiley Blackwell. 359–381.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2010. Contact and new varieties. In Raymond Hickey, ed. The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 230–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Thomas B. 2011. Typology of Creole phonology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuster, Wouter. 2006. Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson, eds. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3–22.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, Kim E. A. Silverman, Frank Tolkmitt, Günther Bergmann and Klaus R. Scherer. 1985. Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78(2): 435–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laver, John. 1980. The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 2008. Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. ‘Toned-up’ Spanish: Stress → pitch → tone(?) in Equatorial Guinea. In Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya, and Teresa O’Neill, eds. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 91. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 233–256.Google Scholar
Lucchesi, Dante, Alan Baxter, and Ilza Ribeiro, eds. 2009. O português afro-brasileiro. Salvador: EDUFBA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron and Jeannette Sakel. 2007. Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2011. Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why do Languages Undress? Berlin: DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker’s guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(2): 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam and Anna Strycharz. 2013. Communities of practice. In J. K. Chambers and Natalie Schilling, eds. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley. 428–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996. Linguistic adaptation to changed environmental conditions: Some lessons from the past. In Alwin Fill, ed. Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. 105–130.Google Scholar
Newman, Michael and Angela Wu. 2011. ‘Do you sound Asian when you speak English?’ Racial identification and voice in Chinese and Korean Americans’ English. American Speech 86(2): 152–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus. 2010. ‘I ain’t never been charged with nothing!’: The use of falsetto speech as a linguistic strategy of indignation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2): 110–121.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala, eds. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 325–347.Google Scholar
Perez, Danae. 2014. Contact languages in contact: On the challenge of compiling the corpus of Afro-Yungueño Spanish. Paper presented at Contact, Variation and Change: Afro-Latin Language Varieties, Aarhus, Denmark.
. 2015. Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30(2): 307–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. fc. Social conditioning of the transmission of areal features in the Central Andes. In Eeva Sippola and Danae M. Perez, eds. Postcolonial Varieties in the Americas. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4): 478–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Gender and the social meaning of non-modal phonation types. In Chundra Cathcart, I-Hsuan Chen, Greg Finley, Shinae Kang, Clare S. Sandy, and Elise Stickles, eds. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 427–448.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. and Patrick Callier. 2015. Voice quality and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 351: 173–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Castillo, Yolanda. 2011. Subsystem interface and tone typology in Papiamentu. In J. Clancy Clements and Shelome Gooden, eds. Language Change in Contact Languages. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 2014. Portuguese remnants in the Afro-Hispanic diaspora. In Patrícia Amaral and Ana M. Carvalho, eds. Portuguese–Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, Synchrony, and Contact. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 403–441.Google Scholar
Sessarego, Sandro. 2013. On the non-Creole bases for Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 281: 363–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2010. Shifting voices with participant roles: Voice qualities and speech registers in Mesoamerica. Language in Society 391: 521–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Voice registers. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, eds. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden: Wiley. 105–126.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jason F. 2010. Decreolization: A critical review. In J. Clancy Clements, Megan E. Solon, Jason F. Siegel, and B. Devan Steiner, eds. ULC Working Papers 9: New Perspectives on Language Contact and Contact-Induced Language Change. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 83–98.Google Scholar
Stross, Brian. 2013. Falsetto voice and observational logic: Motivated meanings. Language in Society 42(2): 139–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 1999. Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Paul Foulkes and Gerald Docherty, eds. Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 203–222.Google Scholar
Studer, Elena F. S. de. 1984 [1958]. La trata de Negros en el Río de la Plata durante el siglo XVIII. Buenos Aires: Edigraf.Google Scholar
Szakay, Anita. 2012. Voice quality as a marker of ethnicity in New Zealand: From acoustics to perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(3): 382–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trittin, Pamela Jean and Andrés des Santos y Lleó. 1995. Voice quality analysis of male and female Spanish speakers. Speech Communication 161: 359–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann. 2001. The Music of Everyday Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2018. A Grammar of Pichi. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Yuasa, Ikuko Patricia. 2010. Creaky voice: A new feminine voice quality for young urban-oriented upwardly mobile American women? American Speech 85(3): 315–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ozerov, Pavel
2021. Prosodic salience in Anal Naga: where non-arbitrariness, phaticity and engagement meet. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Danae Perez, Marianne Hundt, Johannes Kabatek & Daniel Schreier
2021. English and Spanish, DOI logo
Perez, Danae M.
2021. Contact Scenarios and Varieties of Spanish beyond Europe. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.