Article published in:Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure
Edited by Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy and Linnaea Stockall
[Language Faculty and Beyond 10] 2014
► pp. 45–60
Determining argument structure in sign languages
In this paper we offer an overview of existing analyses of argument structure that sets the stage for further inquiry into this domain. The particular structure of the lexicon in sign languages (SLs) is introduced, with special attention to the agreement patterns found in lexical predicates, as overt agreement marking in the set of verbs that can realize it offers a window into verb meaning and overt argument realization. Classifier predicates, on the other hand, have proven to be a very rich domain for research on argument structure: unaccusative/unergative and unaccusative/transitive alternations have been identified in American Sign Language (ASL) classifier constructions, and replicated in other SLs. As expected, the validity of valency tests is sometimes limited to one language, but the alternations are attested crosslinguistically and can be applied to lexical verbs as well. Specially interesting is the traditional divide between agreement marking in lexical predicates and spatial agreement marking in classifier constructions, often seen as having a different nature. Given the fact that the morphological exponence of agreement is superficially the same (i.e. the path or trajectory that the verbal sign crosses in signing space), the divide must be motivated on empirical arguments, which are not always compatible or consistent with a broad empirical coverage. We identify a number of areas where research should be carried out in order to advance our ounderstanding of argument structure in languages in the visual-gestural modality, in order to determine which of the observed properties is really modality-specific.
Published online: 24 July 2014
Benedicto, E., and Brentari, D.
Benedicto, E., Cvejanov, S., and Quer, J.
Benedicto, E., Cvejanov, S. and J. Quer
Brentari, D., and Padden, C.
Embick, D., and Rolf, N.
Glück, S., and Pfau, R.
1999 A Distributed Morphology account of verbal inflection in German Sign Language. In T. Cambier-Langeveld, A. Lipták, M. Redford, and E.J. v.d. Torre (Eds.), Proceedings of Console VI , 65–80.
Grose, D., Wilbur, R.B. and K. Schalber
Halle, M., and Marantz, A.
Lint, V. de
Mathur, G. and Rathmann, C.
Neidle, C. et al.
Padden, Carol A.
Quadros, R.M. de, and Quer, J.
2008 Back to backwards and moving on: on agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty five papers and three posters from the 9th. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianópolis, Brazil, December 2006, 530–551. Petrópolis, RJ: Editora Arara Azul.
Sandler, W., and Lillo-Martin, D.
Tang, G., and Yang
2003a Word formation below and above little x: Evidence from Sign Language of the Netherlands. In A. Dahl, K. Bentzen and P. Svenonius (Eds.), Nordlyd Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics , Vol. 31, 488–502.