Article published in:
Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure
Edited by Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy and Linnaea Stockall
[Language Faculty and Beyond 10] 2014
► pp. 4560
References

References

Baker, M.C.
1988 Incorporation. A theory of grammatical function changing . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benedicto, E., and Brentari, D.
2004Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 743–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedicto, E., Cvejanov, S., and Quer, J.
2007Valency in classifier predicates: A syntactic Analysis. Lingua 117: 1202–1215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedicto, E., Cvejanov, S. and J. Quer
2008The morphosyntax of verbs of motion in serial constructions: a crosslinguistic study in three signed languages. In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004 , 111–132. Seedorf: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Borer, H.
2005 Structuring Sense (2 vol.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D.
1998 A prosodic model of sign language phonology . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, D., and Padden, C.
2001A Language with Multiple Origins: Native and Foreign Vocabulary in American Sign Language. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Language: A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Word Formation , 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Embick, D., and Rolf, N.
2007Distributed Morphology and the Syntax/morphology Interface. In G. Catriona Ramchand (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces , 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E.
1993 Space in Danish Sign Language . Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Glück, S., and Pfau, R.
1999A Distributed Morphology account of verbal inflection in German Sign Language. In T. Cambier-Langeveld, A. Lipták, M. Redford, and E.J. v.d. Torre (Eds.), Proceedings of Console VI , 65–80.
Grose, D., Wilbur, R.B. and K. Schalber
2007Events and telicity in classifier predicates: A reanalysis of body part classifier predicates in ASL. Lingua 117: 1258–1284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., and Marantz, A.
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (Eds.)., The View from Building 20 , 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. and Noyer, R.
1999Distributed Morphology. Glot International 4(4): 3-9.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1997 The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Communication . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008Construction After Construction and Its Theoretical Challenges. Language 84 (1): 8–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janis, W.D.
1995A crosslinguistic perspective on ASL verb agreement. In Language, Gesture, and Space . Karen Emmorey and Judy S. Reilly (Eds.), 255–286. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Kegl, J.
1990Predicate Argument Structure and Verb-Class Organization in the ASL Lexicon. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues , 149–175. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lint, V. de
2010Argument Structure in Classifier Constructions in ASL: an Experimental approach. MA dissertation , Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Mathur, G. and Rathmann, C.
2007The argument structure of classifier predicates in American Sign Language. In A. Rose Deal (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of Semantics of Underrepresented Languages of Americas . Amherst, MA: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Students Association).Google Scholar
Meier, R.P.
1981Icons and morphemes: Models of the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. Papers and reports on child language development 20: 92–99.Google Scholar
Meir, I.
1998Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics 1.1: 3–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli Sign Language. Yearbook of Morphology 1999: 295–315.Google Scholar
2002A Cross-Modality Perspective on Verb Agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 413–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, C. et al.
. 2000 The Syntax of American Sign Language. Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C.A.
1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics, series IV). New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A.
1990The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Quadros, R.M. de, and Quer, J.
2008Back to backwards and moving on: on agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty five papers and three posters from the 9th. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianópolis, Brazil, December 2006, 530–551. Petrópolis, RJ: Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G.C.
2008 Verb meaning and the lexicon. A first phase syntax . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T.
2002The Theta System: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., and Lillo-Martin, D.
2006 Sign Language and Linguistic Universals . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univerisity Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schalber, K.
2006Event visibility in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Sign Language & Linguistics 1/2: 207–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, T.
1990Serial verbs of motion in American Sign Language. In S. Fischer (Ed.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, 129–152. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tang, G., and Yang
2007Events of motion and causation in Hong Kong Sign Language. Lingua 117(7): 1216–1257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur. R.
2008Complex Predicates involving Events, Time and Aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time , 217–250. Seedorf: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I.
2003aWord formation below and above little x: Evidence from Sign Language of the Netherlands. In A. Dahl, K. Bentzen and P. Svenonius (Eds.), Nordlyd Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics , Vol. 31, 488–502.
2003bClassifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar