Luigi piace a Laura?
Electrophysiological evidence for thematic reanalysis with Italian dative object experiencer verbs
Alexander Dröge | Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
Laura Maffongelli | RBCS – Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, IIT – Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky | Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany | School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
The syntactic properties of psych verbs have been debated in theoretical linguistics since the seminal paper by Belletti and Rizzi (1988). However, surprisingly little is known about the neural processes underlying the comprehension of psych verb constructions. Here, we report an electrophysiological study on Italian piacere-class verbs, which were presented in sentences with subject-verb-object (SVO) and object-verb-subject (OVS) orders and contrasted with Agent-Theme (“active”) verbs. At the verb position, we observed a biphasic N400–late positivity pattern for active versus piacere-class verbs in object-initial orders and a late positivity for piacere-class versus active verbs in subject-initial orders. These results demonstrate that thematic expectations are generated incrementally and may be based upon only a single argument. They further support the idea of structural differences between piacere-class verbs and other verb classes in Italian and suggest that these are used rapidly to inform language processing.
References (67)
Altmann, Gerry T.M. and Steedman, Mark
1988 “Interaction with context during human sentence processing.”
Cognition
30: 191–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C
1988
Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing
. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C
1997 “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure.” In
Elements of Grammar
,
Liliane Haegeman (Ed.), 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, Elizabeth, McNew, Sandra, MacWhinney, Brain, Devescovi, Antonella and Smith, Stan
1982 “Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study.”
Cognition
11: 245–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayer, Joseph, Bader, Markus and Meng, Michael
2001 “Morphological underspecification meets oblique case: Syntactic and processing effects in German.”
Lingua
111: 465–514.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana
2001 “Inversion as Focalization.” In
Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar
,
Aafke Hulk and
Jean-Yves Pollock (Eds), 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana
2004 “Aspects of the Low IP Area.” In
The Structure of CP and IP
[The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2],
Luigi Rizzi (Ed.), 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi
1988 “Psych-verbs and θ-theory.”
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
6: 291–352.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, Hans
2004 “Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs.” In
The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface
[Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 5],
Artemis Alexiadou,
Elena Anagnostopoulou and
Martin Everaert (Eds), 84–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blumenthal, Peter and Rovere, Giovanni
1998
PONS: Wörterbuch der italienischen Verben: Konstruktionen, Bedeutungen, Übersetzungen
. Stuttgart: Klett.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel, Ina, McElree, Brian, Schlesewsky, Matthias and Friederici, Angela D
2004 “Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking.”
Journal of Memory and Language
51: 495–522.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias
2006 “The extended Argument Dependency Model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages.”
Psychological Review
113: 787–821.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias and Friederici, Angela D
2003 “Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing.”
Language and Cognitive Processes
18: 268–298.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Friederici, Angela D
.,
von Cramon, D. Yves and
Schlesewsky, Matthias 2005 “Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension.”
NeuroImage
26: 221–233.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias
2008a “An alternative perspective on ‘semantic P600’ effects in language comprehension.”
Brain Research Reviews
59: 55–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias
2009a “The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach.”
Language and Linguistics Compass
3: 19–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias
2009b
Processing Syntax and Morphology
.
A Neurocognitive Perspective
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burzio, Luigi
1986
Italian Syntax
. Dordrecht: Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997 “Subjects and Clause Structure.” In
The New Comparative Syntax
,
Liliane Haegeman (Ed.), 33–63. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna
2001 “A second thought on emarginazione: Destressing vs. ‘Right Dislocation’.” In
Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi
[North-Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic Variations 59],
Guglielmo Cinque and
Giampaolo Salvi (Eds), 117–136. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna
2004 “Toward a cartography of subject positions.” In
The Structure of CP and IP
[The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2],
Luigi Rizzi (Ed.), 115–165. New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1981
Lectures on Government and Binding
. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1995
The Minimalist Program
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In
Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik
,
Roger Martin,
David Michaels and
Juan Uriagereka (Eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
2001 “Derivation by Phase.” In
Ken Hale: A Life in Language
,
Michael Kenstowicz (Ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corrigan, Roberta
1988 “Who Dun It? The Influence of Actor-Patient Animacy and Type of Verb in the Making of Causal Attributions.”
Journal of Memory and Language
27: 447–465.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, Stephen and Steedman, Mark
1985 “On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser.” In
Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives
,
David Dowty,
Lauri Karttunen and
Arnold Zwicky (Eds), 320–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crocker, Matthew W
1994 “On the nature of the principle-based sentence processor.” In
Perspectives on sentence processing, Charles Clifton,
Lyn Frazier and
Keith Rayner (Eds), 245–266. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLong, Katherine A., Urbach, Thomas P. and Kutas, Marta
2005 “Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.”
Nature Neuroscience
8: 1117–1121.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Federmeier, Kara D. and Kutas, Marta
1999 “A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing.”
Journal of Memory and Language
41: 469–495.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferreira, Fernanda
1994 “Choice of Passive Voice Is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy.”
Journal of Memory and Language
33: 715–736.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Janet D
1998 “Learning to parse.”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
27: 285–319.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frazier, Lyn and Fodor, Janet D
1978 “The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.”
Cognition
6: 291–326.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gabriel, Christoph and Müller, Natascha
2008
Grundlagen der generativen Syntax: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch
. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gattei, Carolina, Vasishth, Shravan and Dickey, Michael W
2011
The Role of Semantic Arguments Order and the Syntax-Semantics Interface in Spanish Sentence Comprehension
. Poster presented at Structuring the Argument/Structurer l’argument (CNRS/Paris 8), Paris, France, September 5–7.
Gennari, Silvia P. and MacDonald, Maryellen C
2008 “Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.”
Journal of Memory and Language
58: 161–187.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Jane
1990
Argument Structure
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hruska, Claudia and Alter, Kai
2004 “Prosody in dialogues and single sentences: How prosody can influence sentence perception.” In
Information structure: Theoretical and empirical evidence
,
Anita Steube (Ed.), 211–226. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huynh, Huynh and Feldt, Leonard S
1970 “Conditions under which the mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions.”
Journal of the American Statistical Association
65: 1582–1589.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaan, Edith, Harris, Anthony, Gibson, Edward and Holcomb, Phillip
2000 “The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty.”
Language and Cognitive Processes
15: 159–201.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kailuweit, Rolf
2005
Linking: Syntax und Semantik französischer und italienischer Gefühlsverben
. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamide, Yuki
2008 “Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing.”
Language and Linguistics Compass
2: 647–670.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kasper, Simon
2008 A comparison of ‘thematic role’ theories. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Philipps-Universität, Marburg.
Kretzschmar, Franziska, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Staub, Adrian, Roehm, Dietmar and Schlesewsky, Matthias
2012 “Prominence facilitates ambiguity resolution: On the interaction between referentiality, thematic roles and word order in syntactic reanalysis.” In
Case, word order and prominence. Interacting cues in language production and comprehension
[Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 40],
Monique Lamers and
Peter de Swart (Eds), 239–271. Berlin: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, Marta, DeLong, Katherine A. and Smith, Nathaniel J
2011 “A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing.” In
Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future
,
Moshe Bar (Ed.), 190–207. New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, Steven A
1984 “Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.”
Nature
307: 161–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutas, Marta, Van Petten, Cyma and Kluender, Robert
2006 “
Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994–2005).” In
Handbook of Psycholinguistics
, 2nd edition,
Matthew J. Traxler and
Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds), 659–724. London: Elsevier.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2010
The Locative Syntax of Experiencers
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, Brian, Bates, Elizabeth and Kliegl, Reinhold
1984 “Cue Validity and Sentence Interpretation in English, German, and Italian.”
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
23: 127–150.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mauchly, John W
1940 “Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution.”
Annual of Mathematical Statistics
11: 204–209.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osterhout, L. and Holcomb, P
1992 “Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.”
Journal of Memory and Language
31: 785–806.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, David
1995
Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Primus, Beatrice
1999
Cases and Thematic Roles – Ergative, Accusative and Active
. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Primus, Beatrice
2004 “Protorollen und Verbtyp: Kasusvariation bei psychischen Verben.” In
Semantische Rollen
,
Rolf Kailuweit and
Martin Hummel (Eds), 377–401. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
1982
Issues in Italian Syntax
. Dordrecht: Foris.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
1986 “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.”
Linguistic Inquiry
17: 501–557.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In
Elements of Grammar
,
Liliane Haegeman (Ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
2004 “Locality and Left Periphery.” In
Structures and Beyond
[The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3],
Adriana Belletti (Ed.), 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
2005 “On Some Properties of Subjects and Topics.” In
Contributions to the 30th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa
,
Laura Brugè,
Giuliana Giusti,
Nicola Munaro,
Walter Schweikert and
Giuseppina Turano (Eds), 203–224. Venezia: Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
2006 “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects.” In
Wh-Movement: Moving On
,
Lisa Cheng and
Norbert Corver (Eds), 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlesewsky, Matthias and Bornkessel, Ina
2006 “Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.”
Brain Research
1098: 139–152.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Cynthia K. and Lee, Miseon
2009 “Psych verb production and comprehension in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia.”
Journal of Neurolinguistics
22: 354–369.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Berkum, Jos J.A., Brown, Colin M., Zwitserlood, Pienie, Kooijman, Valesca and Hagoort, Peter
2005 “
Anticipating Upcoming Words in Discourse: Evidence From ERPs and Reading Times.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
31: 443–467.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van de Meerendonk, Nan, Kolk, Herman H.J., Chwilla, Dorothee J. and Vissers, Constance Th. W.M
2009 “Monitoring in language perception.”
Language and Linguistics Compass
3: 1211–1224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wicha, Nicole Y.Y., Moreno, Eva M. and Kutas, Marta
2004 “Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading.”
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
16: 1272–1288.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, Susann, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Hirotani, Masako and Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
2008 “The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese.”
Brain and Language
107: 133–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara
2016.
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.