Cover not available
Part of
Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure
Edited by Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy and Linnaea Stockall
[Language Faculty and Beyond 10] 2014
► pp. 169–183

Argument structure

Between linguistics and neuroimaging

Published online: 24 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.10.08she
References
Bachrach, Asaf
2008  Imaging neural correlates of syntactic complexity in a naturalistic context . Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ben-Shachar, Michal, Hendler, Talma, Kahn, Itamar, Ben-Bashat, Dafna and Grodzinsky, Yosef
2003 The neural reality of syntactic transformations: Evidence from fMRI. Psychological Science 14: 433–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2004 The grammar machine. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle , Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), 288–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Dan
1984  On the content of empty categories . Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986  Italian syntax . Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caplan, David
2007 Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: A critical selective review. Language and Linguistic compass 1: 32–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L
1970  Meaning and the Structure of Language . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965  Aspects of the theory of syntax . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1989  A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences . Ms., Cornell University.Google Scholar
2004 A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle , Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), pp. 22–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart Max
2006 What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)? Cortex 42: 323–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. and Frisch, Stefan
2000 Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument specific information. Journal of Language and Memory 43: 476–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1979 Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar
1982 On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics. In The mental representation of grammatical relations , Joan Bresnan (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef and Friederici, Angela D
2006 Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 240–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henson, Richard
2006 Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: Dissociations versus associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 64–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Julia and Siloni Tal
2009 Hebrew idioms: The organization of the lexical component. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 283–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
1992  Linking and projection based on event structure . Ms, Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A., Keller, Timothy A., Eddy, William F. and Thulborn, Keith R
1996 Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274: 114–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, Edith and Swaab, Tamara
2002 The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in cognitive neuroscience 6: 350–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1988 Romance se/si. Abstract presented at the GLOW 11 Colloquium, Budapest, GLOW newsletter 20: 33.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth A. and Rappaport-Hovav, Malka
1995  Unaccusativity . Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1984  On the nature of grammatical relations . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S.F., & Fazio, F
2001 Syntax and the brain: Disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage 13: 110–118.Google Scholar
den Ouden, Dirk-Bart, Fix, Steve, Parrish, Todd B. and Thompson, Cynthia K
2009 Argument Structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22: 196–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, David and Embick, David
2005 Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones , Anne Cutler (Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M
1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 159–189. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. and Postal, Paul M
1984 The 1-advancement exclusiveness hypothesis. In Studies in relational grammar 2 , David M. Perlmutter and Carol Rosen (Eds), 81–126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David M
1995 Zero syntax: Experiencer and cascades. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1996 Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht University, OTS, Utrecht.Google Scholar
2002 The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya and Siloni, Tali
2004 Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle , Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), pp. 159–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lewis P., Gordon, Betty, Hack, Nancy and Killackey, Jennifer
1993 Verb argument processing in complex sentences in Broca and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language 45: 423–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, Einat and Friedmann, Naama
2012 Stretched, jumped and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage .Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Friedmann, Naama and Hadar, Uri
2009 An fMRI study of syntactic layers: Sentential and lexical aspects of embedding. Neuroimage 48: 707–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2306–2315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b The representation of optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 31: 770–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Linzen, Tal and Friedmann, Naama
2011 The effects of complement predictability on the processing of verb’s complementation options. Poster presented at the 3rd Neurobiology of Language Conference, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Shetreet, Einat, Palti, Dafna, Friedmann, Naama and Hadar Uri
2007 Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1958–1969. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siloni, T
2008 On the Hitpa’el template. In Theoretical Hebrew Linguistics , Galia Hatav (Ed.), pp. 111–138. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
Stromswold, Karin, Caplan, David, Alpert, Nathaniel and Rauch, Scott
1996 Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language 52: 452–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia K., Bonakdarpour, Borna, Fix, Stephen C., Blumenfeld, Henrike K., Parrish, Todd B., Gitelman, Darren R. and Mesulam, M. -Marsel
2007 Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1753–1767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Valin, Robert D
2001  An introduction to syntax . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar