Part of
Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure
Edited by Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy and Linnaea Stockall
[Language Faculty and Beyond 10] 2014
► pp. 185200
References
Altmann, Gerry T
1997 The Ascent of Babel . Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bard, E., C. Frenck-Mestre, and A. Sorace
2010Processing auxiliary selection with italian intransitive verbs. Linguistics 48 2: 325–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring Sense: An Exo-Skeletal Trilogy . Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan and Liina Pylkkanen
2010Processing psych verbs: Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 25 6: 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2003The morpheme that wouldn’t go away. Handout on Urdu causatives. Ms., University of Konstanz (http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/butt).Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface , edited by Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert, pp. 22–59. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (first circulated in 1989). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1998Event structure in argument linking. In The Projection of Arguments , edited by Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella
2001On the relation of priority between causative and inchoative constructions. In Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory 1999 , edited by Johan Rooryck Yves D’Hulst and Jan Schroten, pp. 143–166. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, Silvia and David Poeppel
2003Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition 89 2: 27–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity , edited by Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky, pp. 87–120. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husband, E.M., L. Stockall, and A. Beretta
2008Vp-internal event composition: Processing evidence for phrase-level event interpretation. Ms. Michigan State University, Hampshire College.Google Scholar
Kim, Mikyong and Cynthia Thompson
2004Verb deficits in alzheimer’s disease and agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language 88 1: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005 Argument Realization. Research Surveys in Linguistics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
2013Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G. and T. Macfarland
2000Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76: 833–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs. Cognitive Psychology 45: 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence
1990 Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1999 Words and Rules . New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995 The Generative Lexicon . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon . Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Argument structure and argument structure alternations. In Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax edited by Marcel den Dikken pp. 265 321 Cambridge University Press
Reinhart, T
2002The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28 3.Google Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia
2003Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: A syntactic account of verb production deficits. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16: 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia and M. Lee
2009Psych verb production and comprehension in agrammatic broca’s aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22 4: 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar