Article published in:
Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 109128
References

References

Beghelli, Filippo and Stowell, Tim
1997“Distributivity and negation. The syntax of each and every.” In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Thrainsson, Höskuldur
1998“Two heads aren’t always better than one.” Syntax 1: 37–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Sue
1999The Syntax of negation in Russian: A Minimalist approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2006 “Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the “Logicality” of language.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Meaning as an inferential system. Polarity and free-choice phenomena.” Ms., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002“Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005“Three factors in language design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2006Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel David, Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko and Kitahara, Hisatsugu
1998A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel David and Seely, Daniel
2002Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1997“Projections, heads and optimality.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–442.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, Raffaella
1991“Negative heads and the neg criterion.” The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996“Negative concord in West Flemish.” In Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds), 117–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Lohndal, Terje
2010“Negative concord and multiple agree: A case study of West Flemish.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herburger, Elena
2001“The negative concord puzzle revisited.” Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine
1990“About AgrP.” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 421–459.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010 “Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 787–822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit and Landman, Fred
1993“Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
2000Parameters and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf
2000 “The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1995“The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items in assertion.” Linguistic Analysis 15: 209–257.Google Scholar
Laka, I.
1990 “Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2010Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein
2003Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentential Modification. Ph.D. disseration, Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther
2007“The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy W. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989“Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul
2000 “An introduction to the grammar of squat.” Ms., NYU.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljiana
2005“Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items.” In Negation in Slavic, S. Brown & A. Przepiórkowski (eds), Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997“The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2004The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001 “Move Dissolves Into Merge: A Theory of Locality.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
2004“On the Inexistence of Specifiers and the Nature of Heads.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2006“Interpreting uninterpretable features.” Linguistic Analysis 33: 375–413.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1991 “Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedzer Hugo
2004 “Sentential Negation and Negative Concord.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2008“On the syntactic flexibility of formal features.” In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation, 143–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010“On French negation.” In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, Iksoo Kwon, Hannah. Pritchett & Justin Spence (eds). Berkely, CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Syntax of Information-Structural Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 268], Crossref logo
Biberauer, Theresa
2019. Some thoughts on the complexity of syntactic complexity . Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. & Hedde Zeijlstra
2019. Checking Up on (ϕ-)Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50:3  pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo
Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra
2021. The Complex Beauty of Boundary Adverbials: In Years and Until. Linguistic Inquiry 52:1  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Walkden, George & Anne Breitbarth
2019. Interpreting (un)interpretability. Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.