Part of
Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfacesEdited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 109–128
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 109–128
On the uninterpretability of interpretable features
In this paper I present several arguments that argue against the assumption in current generative syntactic theory that certain formal features are semantically active as well (so-called interpretable formal features). Instead, I propose that the set of formal features and the set of semantic features (to the extent that they are featural in the first place) are fully independent. An acquisitional and diachronic theory further constrains the possible combinations of syntactic and semantic features that can be lexically stored, which results in the apparent overlap in the distribution of particular syntactic and semantic features (which has originally been the cause of taking them on a par).
References
Beghelli, Filippo and Stowell, Tim
1997 “Distributivity and negation. The syntax of each and every.” In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 
Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Thrainsson, Höskuldur
1998 “Two heads aren’t always better than one.” Syntax 1: 37–71.
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Brown, Sue
1999 The Syntax of negation in Russian: A Minimalist approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Chierchia, Gennaro
2006 “Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the “Logicality” of language.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590.
2011 “Meaning as an inferential system. Polarity and free-choice phenomena.” Ms., Harvard University.
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2002 “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2005 “Three factors in language design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(ed.) 2002 Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(ed.) 2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, Samuel David, Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko and Kitahara, Hisatsugu
1998 A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, Samuel David and Seely, Daniel
2002 Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Grimshaw, Jane
1997 “Projections, heads and optimality.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–442.
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, Raffaella
1991 “Negative heads and the neg criterion.” The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.
1996 “Negative concord in West Flemish.” In Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds), 117–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane and Lohndal, Terje
2010 “Negative concord and multiple agree: A case study of West Flemish.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211.
Herburger, Elena
2001 “The negative concord puzzle revisited.” Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333.
Iatridou, Sabine
1990 “About AgrP.” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 421–459.
Jäger, Agnes
2010 “Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 787–822.
Kadmon, Nirit and Landman, Fred
1993 “Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422.
Kayne, Richard
2000 Parameters and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koeneman, Olaf
2000 “The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Krifka, Manfred
1995 “The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items in assertion.” Linguistic Analysis 15: 209–257.
Laka, I
1990 “Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2010 Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nilsen, Øystein
2003 Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentential Modification. Ph.D. disseration, Universiteit Utrecht.
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther
2007 “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy W. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 “Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
Postal, Paul
2000 “An introduction to the grammar of squat.” Ms., NYU.
Progovac, Ljiljiana
2005 “Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items.” In Negation in Slavic, S. Brown & A. Przepiórkowski (eds), Slavica Publishers.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2004 The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Anna
2003 Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starke, Michal
2001 “Move Dissolves Into Merge: A Theory of Locality.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
2004 “On the Inexistence of Specifiers and the Nature of Heads.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Svenonius, Peter
2006 “Interpreting uninterpretable features.” Linguistic Analysis 33: 375–413.
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1991 “Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zeijlstra, Hedzer Hugo
2004 “Sentential Negation and Negative Concord.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
2008 “On the syntactic flexibility of formal features.” In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation, 143–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2010 “On French negation.” In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, Iksoo Kwon, Hannah. Pritchett & Justin Spence (eds). Berkely, CA: BLS.
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Adenuga, Priscilla
2022. Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè. In A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives [Language Faculty and Beyond, 17], ► pp. 155 ff. 
Amsili, Pascal & Claire Beyssade
2021. Plus in the French negative system. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 30 ff.
Biberauer, Theresa
2019. Some thoughts on the complexity of syntactic complexity
. Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4 ► pp. 259 ff.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. & Hedde Zeijlstra
2019. Checking Up on (ϕ-)Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50:3 ► pp. 527 ff.
Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra
2021. The Complex Beauty of Boundary Adverbials: In Years and Until. Linguistic Inquiry 52:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Larson, Richard K.
2022. Adjectives, case and concord. In A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives [Language Faculty and Beyond, 17], ► pp. 73 ff.
Walkden, George & Anne Breitbarth
2019. Interpreting (un)interpretability. Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4 ► pp. 309 ff.
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2022. Negation and Negative Dependencies,
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Abbreviations. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.