In this paper I present several arguments that argue against the assumption in current generative syntactic theory that certain formal features are semantically active as well (so-called interpretable formal features). Instead, I propose that the set of formal features and the set of semantic features (to the extent that they are featural in the first place) are fully independent. An acquisitional and diachronic theory further constrains the possible combinations of syntactic and semantic features that can be lexically stored, which results in the apparent overlap in the distribution of particular syntactic and semantic features (which has originally been the cause of taking them on a par).
1989“Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP.”Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
2000 “An introduction to the grammar of squat.” Ms., NYU.
2005“Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items.” In Negation in Slavic, S. Brown & A. Przepiórkowski (eds), Slavica Publishers.
1997“The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2004The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2001 “Move Dissolves Into Merge: A Theory of Locality.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
2004“On the Inexistence of Specifiers and the Nature of Heads.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.