In this paper I present several arguments that argue against the assumption in current generative syntactic theory that certain formal features are semantically active as well (so-called interpretable formal features). Instead, I propose that the set of formal features and the set of semantic features (to the extent that they are featural in the first place) are fully independent. An acquisitional and diachronic theory further constrains the possible combinations of syntactic and semantic features that can be lexically stored, which results in the apparent overlap in the distribution of particular syntactic and semantic features (which has originally been the cause of taking them on a par).
Beghelli, Filippo and Stowell, Tim. 1997. “Distributivity and negation. The syntax of each and every.” In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Thrainsson, Höskuldur. 1998. “Two heads aren’t always better than one.”Syntax 1: 37–71.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Brown, Sue. 1999. The Syntax of negation in Russian: A Minimalist approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. “Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the “Logicality” of language.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2011. “Meaning as an inferential system. Polarity and free-choice phenomena.” Ms., Harvard University.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2002. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. “Three factors in language design.”Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo (ed.). 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo (ed.). 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, Samuel David, Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko and Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1998. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, Samuel David and Seely, Daniel. 2002. Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. “Projections, heads and optimality.”Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–442.
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. “Negative heads and the neg criterion.”The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1996. “Negative concord in West Flemish.” In Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds), 117–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane and Lohndal, Terje. 2010. “Negative concord and multiple agree: A case study of West Flemish.”Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211.
Herburger, Elena. 2001. “The negative concord puzzle revisited.”Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333.
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. “Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 787–822.
Kadmon, Nirit and Landman, Fred. 1993. “Any.”Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422.
Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. “The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. “The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items in assertion.”Linguistic Analysis 15: 209–257.
Laka, I. 1990. “Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentential Modification. Ph.D. disseration, Universiteit Utrecht.
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther. 2007. “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy W. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. “Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP.”Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
Postal, Paul. 2000. “An introduction to the grammar of squat.” Ms., NYU.
Progovac, Ljiljiana. 2005. “Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items.” In Negation in Slavic, S. Brown & A. Przepiórkowski (eds), Slavica Publishers.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starke, Michal. 2001. “Move Dissolves Into Merge: A Theory of Locality.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Starke, Michal. 2004. “On the Inexistence of Specifiers and the Nature of Heads.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeijlstra, Hedzer Hugo. 2010. “On French negation.” In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, Iksoo Kwon, Hannah. Pritchett & Justin Spence (eds). Berkely, CA: BLS.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.