Part of
Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 267286
References (66)
References
Bane, Max. 2008. “Quantifying and measuring morphological complexity.” In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 69–76. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua and Shamir, Eli. 1960. “Finite-state languages: Formal representations and adequacy problems.” Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel 8(3): 155–166.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert and Chomsky, Noam. 2011. “The biolinguistic program. The current state of its development.” In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, Anna Maria Di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx (eds), 19–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1998. “The creation and re-creation of language.” In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications, Charles B. Crawford and Dennis I. Krebs (eds), 613–634. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1990. Language and Species. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2006. Linguistic Minimalism. Origins, Concepts, Methods and Aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke and Kampers-Mahne, Brigitte. 2005. “Taking a closer look at Romance VN compounds.” In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics, vol. 1: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, Chiyo Nishida and Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (eds), 13–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carden, Guy. 1983. “The non-finiteness of the word formation component.” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 537–547.Google Scholar
Chaitin, Gregory J. 1987. Algorithmic Information Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2011. The Poverty of the Stimulus: Unfinished Business. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
. 2008. “On phases.” In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Three factors in language design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, D. Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
. 1956. “Three models for the description of language.” IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2(2): 113–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Miller, George A. 1963. “Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages.” In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 2, Robert Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush and Eugene Galanter (eds), 269–321. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa and Sybesma, Rint. 1999. “Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP.” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2001. “Eliminating labels.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2005. “Endangered numeral systems.” In Bedrohte Vielfalt: Aspekte des Sprach (en)tods [Endangered Diversity: Aspects of Language Death], Jan Wohlgemuth and Tyko Dirksmeyer (eds), 203–230. Berlin: Weißensee Verlag.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1978. Gramática, Semántica, Universales. Estudios de Lingüística Funcional, Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Culy, Christopher. 1985. “The complexity of the vocabulary of Bambara.” Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 345–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria. 2013. “Morphology and the complement adjunct asymmetry.” In Exploring Word Structure at the Interface, Máire Noonan, Glyne Piggott and Lisa Travis (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Perspectives on morphological complexity.” In Morphology. (Ir)regularity, Frequency, Typology, Ferenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi and Péter Siptar (eds), 105–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Fossils in language?” Paper presented at the 44th Annnual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europea , Logrono, September 8–11, 2011.
. 2009. “Why are compounds part of natural languages: A view from asymmetry theory.” In Handbook of Compounds, Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds), 145–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Affixes at the edge.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics.” Special edition 50th Anniversary 50: 83–117.Google Scholar
. 2005c. “Decomposing compounds.” SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2: 14–33.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2003. “Asymmetry in grammar, volume 1: morphology, phonology and acquisition.” Asymmetry in Grammar, Volume 2: Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. “Des principes généraux qui couvrent la syntaxe et la morphologie: le cas des composés syntaxiques.” Recherche de linguistique à Montréal 18: 197–210.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Boeckx, Cedric (eds). 2011. The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Tomioka, Naoko. 2011. “Compound representation at the interface.” Proceedings of Generative Linguistics in Poland: GLiP-6. Cambridge Scholar.
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo, Wexler, Kenneth, Berwick, Robert C., Boeckx, Cedric, Jenkins, Lyle, Uriagereka, Juan, Stromswold, Karin, Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, Harley, Heidi, Wedel, Andrew, McGilvray, James, van Gelderen, Elly and Bever, Thomas G. 2010. “The biological nature of human language.” Biolinguistics 4: 4–34.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Isac, Dana. 2008. “The asymmetry of merge.” Biolinguistics 2(4): 260–290.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., Thomas G. Bever and Merrill F. Garrett. 1974. The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico. 2010. A nanosyntactic account of Romance VN compounds. Universit‡ Ca’ Foscari, Venezia.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2011. Where Does Predication Come From? Ms., Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec. 1993. “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection.” In The View from Building 20, Kenneth Hale and S. Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?” Science 298: 1569–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James, Studdert-Kennedy, Michael and Knight, Chris. 1998. Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2011. The Human Language Faculty. Ms. Tufts University.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds), 105–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(7): 272–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2011. “Why are there no directionality parameters?” In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer and Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), 1–23, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kimball, John. 1973. “Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural Language.” Cognition 2: 15–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, Andrey N. 1965. “Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information.” Problems in Information Transmission 1: 1–7.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard, Deprez, Viviane and Yamakido, Hiroko. 2010. The Evolution of Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1981. “The generative capacity of word-formation component.” Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 320–322.Google Scholar
Milin, Petar, Kuperman, Victor, Kostic, Aleksandar and Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. “Paradigms bit by bit: An information theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation.” In Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds), 214–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moscoso Del Prado Martín, Fermín, Kostic, Aleksandar and Baayen, R. Harald. 2004. “An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing.” Cognition 94(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther. 2001. “T–to–C: Causes and consequences.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language (Current Studies in Linguistics 36), Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo, Uriagereka, Juan and Salaburu, Pello (eds). 2009. Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana and Locke, John L. 2009. “The urge to merge: Ritual insult and the evolution of syntax.” Biolinguistics 3(2): 337–354.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky (James) 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart. 1985. “Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 333–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tollemache, Federico. 1945. Le parole composte nella lingua italiana. Roma: Rores.Google Scholar
Tsapini, Kyrana, Jarema, Gonia and Di Sciullo, Anna Maria. 2004. “The role of configurational asymmetry in the lexical access of prefixed verbs: Evidence from French.” Brain and Language 90: 143–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2011. “Structure and order: Asymmetric merge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 96–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Roeper, Tom, Marcus Maia & Aniela Improta França
2020. Old Story, New Results and Analyses. Cadernos de Linguística 1:1  pp. 01 ff. DOI logo
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Calixto Aguero-Bautista
2016. The biolinguistics program. In Biolinguistic Investigations on the Language Faculty [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 235],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kosta, Peter
2015. On the Causative/Anti-Causative Alternation as Principle of Affix Ordering in the Light of the Mirror Principle, the Lexical Integrity Principle and the Distributed Morphology. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 60:4  pp. 570 ff. DOI logo
Nóbrega, Vitor A. & Shigeru Miyagawa
2015. The precedence of syntax in the rapid emergence of human language in evolution as defined by the integration hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.