Article published in:
The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in honor of Jean Lowenstamm
Edited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi and Nicola Lampitelli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 12] 2014
► pp. 193–208

Staying away from the weak left edge

A strengthening strategy

| Tel-Aviv University
The left edge of the word is a strong position; it tends to resist phonological processes and be the left anchor in the formation of hypocoristics, in Hebrew (e.g. [matitjáhu] → [máti]) as well as in other languages. However, when the left edge of the base name hosts a weak segment, it has a good chance of being truncated (e.g. [jisʁaéla] → [ʁéli]). Truncation at the left edge (apheresis), as I show, is gradual; the weaker the segment at the left edge of the base, the greater the tendency to truncate this edge. Truncation at the left edge, as I argue, is a strengthening strategy – strengthening by avoiding the weak.
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.12.15bat
References

References

Adam, Galit, and Outi Bat-El
2009 “When Do Universal Preferences Emerge in Language Development? The Acquisition of Hebrew Stress.” Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bat-El, Outi
2002 “True Truncation in Colloquial Hebrew Imperatives.” Language 78: 651–683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “The Emergence of the Trochaic Foot in Hebrew Hypocoristics.” Phonology 22: 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983 “Consonant Strength Hierarchies and Danish.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 6: 115–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N.
1998 Positional Faithfulness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Ben-David, Avivit
2012 “The Development of Prosodic Structure: Evidence from Typical Longitudinal Data.” Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 4: 55–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral
(eds) 2008 Lenition and Fortition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A., and Ashley W. Farris-Trimble
2008a “Developmental Shifts in Phonological Strength Relations.” In Strength Relations in Phonology, ed. by Kuniya Nasukawa, and Phillip Backley, 113–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008b “The Prominence Paradox.” In Optimality Theory, Phonological Acquisition and Disorders, ed. by Daniel Dinnsen, and Judith Gierut, 277–308. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Escure, Geneviève
1977 “Hierarchies and Phonological Weakening.” Lingua 43: 55–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, James
1977 Foundations of Theoretical Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodglass, Harold, Arthur Wingfield, Mary R. Hyde, Jean Berko Gleason, Nancy L. Bowles, and Roberta E. Gallagher
1997 “The Importance of Word-initial Phonology: Error Patterns in Prolonged Naming Efforts by Aphasic Patients.” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3: 128–138.Google Scholar
Halicki, Eric C.
2008 “Accorciamenti, Hypocoristics, and Foot Structure: Against the Ternary Foot in Italian.” IULC Working Papers Online. Catalina Mendez-Vallejo, and Ken De Jong (eds) 7: 1–13.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1990 “Segmental Complexity and Phonological Government.” Phonology 7: 255–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Why Final Devoicing is Weakening.” In Strength Relations in Phonology, ed. by Kuniya Nasukawa, and Phillip Backley, 9–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick
2008 “Lenition, Weakening and Consonantal Strength: Tracing Concepts through the History of Phonology.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 9–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
1975 Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Katamba, Francis
1979 “How Hierarchical and Universal Is Consonant Strength?” Theoretical Linguistics 6: 23–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karni, Noa
2012 “Minimizing Faithfulness Violations in the Acquisition of Onset.” Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 4: 80–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1985 “The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government.” Phonology Yearbook 2: 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Robert M.
1998 An Effort-based Approach to Consonant Lenition. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Kula, Nancy, and Lutz Marten
2009 “Defining Initial Strength in Clusterless Languages in Strict CV.” In Strength Relations in Phonology, ed. by Kuniya Nasukawa, and Phillip Backley, 47–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lipski, John
1995 “Spanish Hypocoristics: Towards a Unified Prosodic Analysis.” Hispanic Linguistics 6/7: 387–434.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
1999 “The Beginning of the Word.” In Phonologica 1996: Syllables!?, ed. by John R. Rennison, and Klaus Kühnhammer, 153–166. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William
1987 “Functional Parallelism in Spoken Word Recognition.” Cognition 25: 71–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William, and Pienie Zwitserlood
1989 “Accessing Spoken Words: The Importance of Word Onset.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 15: 576–585.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya, and Phillip Backley
(eds) 2009 Strength Relations in Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Nicole
1998 “Mixed Anchoring in French Hypocoristic Formation.” RuLing Papers 1 (Working Papers from Rutgers University): 185–199.Google Scholar
Piñeros, Carlos Eduardo
2000 “Prosodic and Segmental Unmarkedness in Spanish Truncation.” Linguistics 38: 63–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren D.
1992 “On Deriving Sonority: A Structural Account of Sonority Relationships.” Phonology 9: 61–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ségéral, Philippe, and Tobias Scheer
2008a “Positional Factors in Lenition and Fortition.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 131–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008b “The Coda Mirror, Stress and Positional Parameters.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 483–518. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shiraishi, Hidetoshi
2009 “Modeling Initial Weakening.” In Strength Relations in Phonology, ed. by Kuniya Nasukawa, and Phillip Backley, 183–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L.
2002 Phonological Augmentation in Prominent Positions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1994 “Positional Neutralization and the Expression of Contrast.” Ms., UCLA.
Thornton, Anna M.
1996 “On Some Phenomena of Prosodic Morphology in Italian: Accorciamenti, Hypocoristics, and Prosodic Delimitation.” Probus 8: 81–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weeda, Donald S.
1992 Word Truncation in Prosodic Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2012 “Left­edge Deletion in English and Subject Omission in Diaries.” English Language and Linguistics 16: 105–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ben-David, Avivit & Outi Bat-El
2016.  In Acquisition and Development of Hebrew [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 19], ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.