Article published in:
The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in honor of Jean Lowenstamm
Edited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi and Nicola Lampitelli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 12] 2014
► pp. 315330
Arbaoui, Nora
2010Les dix formes de l’arabe classique à l’interface syntaxe/phonologie. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
Balogné-Bérces, Katalin
2005Strict CV Phonology and the English Cross-Word Puzzle. Ph.D. dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.Google Scholar
Bendjaballah, Sabrina
1999Trois figures de la structure interne des gabarits. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
2001“The Negative Preterite in Kabyle Berber.” Folia Linguistica 34: 185–223.Google Scholar
2012La grammaire des gabarits. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, University Paris 7.Google Scholar
Bendjaballah, Sabrina, and Martin Haiden
2003“Templatic Architecture.” Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 32: 157–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013“The Representational Anomalies of Floating Markers: Light Prepositions in Taqbaylit of Chemini.” In Challenges to Linearization, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, and Ian Roberts, 331–376. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine, and Tobias Scheer
2010“Lenition in Branching Onsets in French and in ALF Dialects.” In Development of Language through the Lens of Formal Linguistics, ed. by Petr Karlík, 15–28. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Charette, Monik
2003“Empty and Pseudo-empty Categories.” In Living on the Edge. 28 Papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye, ed. by Stefan Ploch, 465–479. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Morris Halle, and Fred Lukoff
1956“On Accent and Juncture in English.” In For Roman Jakobson. Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, ed. by Morris Halle, Horace Lunt, Hugh McLean, and Cornelis van Schooneveld, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Guerssel, Mohand, and Jean Lowenstamm
1990“The Derivational Morphology of the Classical Arabic Verb.” Ms., UQAM and University Paris 7.
Kihm, Alain
2004“Les pluriels internes arabes: un essai d’anatomie.” Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 99: 311–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kijak, Artur
2005Polish and English Complex Consonantal Onsets: A Contrastive Analysis within the Government Phonology Framework. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Katowice.Google Scholar
Lahrouchi, Mohamed
2001Aspects morpho-phonologiques de la dérivation verbale en berbère (parler chleuh d’Agadir). Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris7.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
1996“CV as the Only Syllable Type.” In Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, vol. 2, ed. by Jacques Durand, and Bernard Laks, 419–441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
1999“The Beginning of the Word.” In Phonologica 1996, ed. by John Rennison, and Klaus Kühnhammer, 153–166. La Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2002“A Note on the Segmental Identification of Templatic Sites.” Ms., University Paris 7.
Luo, Xiaoliang
2013Vers une phonologie gabaritique du chinois. Analyse des interactions entre syllabe, ton et processus morphologiques. Ph.D. thesis, Université d’Orléans.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel
1986Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pagliano, Claudine
2003L’épenthèse consonantique en français. Ce que la syntaxe, la sémantique et la morphologie peuvent faire à la phonologie. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Nice.Google Scholar
Pak, Majorie
2008The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990Relativized Minimality. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 16. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget
2009The Structure of Phonological Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sanoudaki, Eirini
2010 “Towards a Typology of Word Initial Consonant Clusters: Evidence from the Acquisition of Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 10: 1–41. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer. DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
1999 “A Theory of Consonantal Interaction.” Folia Linguistica 32: 201–237. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2000De la Localité, de la Morphologie et de la Phonologie en Phonologie. Habilitation thesis, Université de Nice. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2004A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol.1: What is CVCV, and why Should it Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007“On the Status of Word-Initial Clusters in Slavic (And Elsewhere).” In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Toronto Meeting 2006, ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 346–364. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2008“Why the Prosodic Hierarchy is a Diacritic and Why the Interface Must Be Direct.” In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–192. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2009a “External Sandhi: What the Initial CV is Initial of.” Studi e Saggi Linguistici 47: 43–82. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2009b“Representational and Procedural Sandhi Killers: Diagnostics, Distribution, Behaviour.” In Czech in Formal Grammar, ed. by Mojmír Dočekal, and Markéta Ziková, 155–174. München: Lincom. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2011A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories. How Extra-Phonological Information is Treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012Direct Interface and One-Channel Translation. A Non-Diacritic Theory of the Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface. Vol.2 of a Lateral Theory of Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias, and Markéta Ziková
2010“The Coda Mirror v2.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57 (4): 411–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ségéral, Philippe
2000“Théorie de l’apophonie et organisation des schèmes en sémitique.” In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm, and Ur Shlonsky, 263–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer. DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ségéral, Philippe, and Tobias Scheer
2001 “La Coda-Miroir.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 96: 107–152. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer. DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008a“Positional Factors in Lenition and Fortition.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 131–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
2008b“The Coda Mirror, Stress and Positional Parameters.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 483–518. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar
Seigneur-Froli, Delphine
2006Le Statut phonologique du début de mot grec. Lénitions consonantiques et libertés phonotactiques initiales dans la diachronie de la langue commune et dans le dialecte de Lesbos. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nice. Available at http://​sites​.unice​.fr​/scheer.Google Scholar