Across all structuralist and generative incarnations, interface theories are based on unwarranted diacritics: #, ω etc. Lowenstamm’s initial CV has paved the way for a non-diacritic interface theory: the carrier of morpho-syntactic information in phonology is syllabic space. The article shows that the initial CV is able to kill three birds with one stone (strength of initial consonants, initial cluster restrictions, syncope of first vowels). It is then argued for the idea that carriers of morpho-syntactic information in phonology reduce to syllabic space (there are no other carriers). Finally, it is shown that boundary information does not belong to the same lexical entry as morphemic information: the initial CV for example is not present in the lexical entry of the word it precedes.
Arbaoui, Nora. 2010. Les dix formes de l’arabe classique à l’interface syntaxe/phonologie. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.
Balogné-Bérces, Katalin. 2005. Strict CV Phonology and the English Cross-Word Puzzle. Ph.D. dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
Bendjaballah, Sabrina. 1999. Trois figures de la structure interne des gabarits. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris 7.
Bendjaballah, Sabrina. 2001. “The Negative Preterite in Kabyle Berber.”Folia Linguistica 34: 185–223.
Bendjaballah, Sabrina. 2012. La grammaire des gabarits. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, University Paris 7.
Bendjaballah, Sabrina, and Martin Haiden. 2003. “Templatic Architecture.”Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 32: 157–168.
Bendjaballah, Sabrina, and Martin Haiden. 2013. “The Representational Anomalies of Floating Markers: Light Prepositions in Taqbaylit of Chemini.” In Challenges to Linearization, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, and Ian Roberts, 331–376. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine, and Tobias Scheer. 2010. “Lenition in Branching Onsets in French and in ALF Dialects.” In Development of Language through the Lens of Formal Linguistics, ed. by Petr Karlík, 15–28. Munich: Lincom.
Charette, Monik. 2003. “Empty and Pseudo-empty Categories.” In Living on the Edge. 28 Papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye, ed. by Stefan Ploch, 465–479. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam, Morris Halle, and Fred Lukoff. 1956. “On Accent and Juncture in English.” In For Roman Jakobson. Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, ed. by Morris Halle, Horace Lunt, Hugh McLean, and Cornelis van Schooneveld, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.
Guerssel, Mohand, and Jean Lowenstamm. 1990. “The Derivational Morphology of the Classical Arabic Verb.” Ms., UQAM and University Paris 7.
Kihm, Alain. 2004. “Les pluriels internes arabes: un essai d’anatomie.”Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 99: 311–361.
Kijak, Artur. 2005. Polish and English Complex Consonantal Onsets: A Contrastive Analysis within the Government Phonology Framework. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Katowice.
Lahrouchi, Mohamed. 2001. Aspects morpho-phonologiques de la dérivation verbale en berbère (parler chleuh d’Agadir). Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris7.
Lowenstamm, Jean. 1996. “CV as the Only Syllable Type.” In Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, vol. 2, ed. by Jacques Durand, and Bernard Laks, 419–441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI. Available at [URL].
Lowenstamm, Jean. 1999. “The Beginning of the Word.” In Phonologica 1996, ed. by John Rennison, and Klaus Kühnhammer, 153–166. La Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. Available at [URL].
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2002. “A Note on the Segmental Identification of Templatic Sites.” Ms., University Paris 7.
Luo, Xiaoliang. 2013. Vers une phonologie gabaritique du chinois. Analyse des interactions entre syllabe, ton et processus morphologiques. Ph.D. thesis, Université d’Orléans.
Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Pagliano, Claudine. 2003. L’épenthèse consonantique en français. Ce que la syntaxe, la sémantique et la morphologie peuvent faire à la phonologie. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Nice.
Pak, Majorie. 2008. The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 16. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Samuels, Bridget. 2009. The Structure of Phonological Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Sanoudaki, Eirini. 2010. “Towards a Typology of Word Initial Consonant Clusters: Evidence from the Acquisition of Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 10: 1–41. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 1999. “A Theory of Consonantal Interaction.” Folia Linguistica 32: 201–237. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 2000. De la Localité, de la Morphologie et de la Phonologie en Phonologie. Habilitation thesis, Université de Nice. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol.1: What is CVCV, and why Should it Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scheer, Tobias. 2007. “On the Status of Word-Initial Clusters in Slavic (And Elsewhere).” In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Toronto Meeting 2006, ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 346–364. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 2008. “Why the Prosodic Hierarchy is a Diacritic and Why the Interface Must Be Direct.” In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–192. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 2009a. “External Sandhi: What the Initial CV is Initial of.” Studi e Saggi Linguistici 47: 43–82. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 2009b. “Representational and Procedural Sandhi Killers: Diagnostics, Distribution, Behaviour.” In Czech in Formal Grammar, ed. by Mojmír Dočekal, and Markéta Ziková, 155–174. München: Lincom. Available at [URL].
Scheer, Tobias. 2011. A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories. How Extra-Phonological Information is Treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scheer, Tobias. 2012. Direct Interface and One-Channel Translation. A Non-Diacritic Theory of the Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface. Vol.2 of a Lateral Theory of Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Scheer, Tobias, and Markéta Ziková. 2010. “The Coda Mirror v2.”Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57 (4): 411–431.
Ségéral, Philippe, and Tobias Scheer. 2001. “La Coda-Miroir.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 96: 107–152. Available at [URL].
Ségéral, Philippe, and Tobias Scheer. 2008a. “Positional Factors in Lenition and Fortition.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 131–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at [URL].
Ségéral, Philippe, and Tobias Scheer. 2008b. “The Coda Mirror, Stress and Positional Parameters.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 483–518. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at [URL].
Seigneur-Froli, Delphine. 2006. Le Statut phonologique du début de mot grec. Lénitions consonantiques et libertés phonotactiques initiales dans la diachronie de la langue commune et dans le dialecte de Lesbos. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nice. Available at [URL].
Cited by (38)
Cited by 38 other publications
Basbøll, Hans
2022. Phonology in Glossematics in Northern and Western Europe. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 331 ff.
Battistella, Edwin
2022. The Prague School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 221 ff.
Bohas, Georges & Jean Lowenstamm
2022. Thetaṣrīfin the medieval Arabic grammatical tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 83 ff.
Calabrese, Andrea
2022. Historical notes on constraint-and-repair approaches. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 530 ff.
Chandlee, Jane & Adam Jardine
2022. Phonological theory and computational modelling. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 656 ff.
de Boer, Bart
2022. Phonology and evolution. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 694 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Daniel Currie Hall
2022. Developments leading towards generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 372 ff.
Dresher, B. Elan & Harry van der Hulst
2022. Introduction. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 1 ff.
B. Elan Dresher & Harry van der Hulst
2022. The Oxford History of Phonology,
Duanmu, San & Haruo Kubozono
2022. The East Asian tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 64 ff.
Fruehwald, Josef
2022. The study of variation. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 569 ff.
Hall, Kathleen Currie
2022. Corpora and phonological analysis. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 619 ff.
Heinz, Jeffrey & Jonathan Rawski
2022. Learnability in phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 677 ff.
Hulst, Harry van der
2022. The (early) history of sign language phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 284 ff.
Iosad, Pavel
2022. Phonology in the Soviet Union. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 309 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2022. Saussure and structural phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 203 ff.
Kenstowicz, Michael J.
2022. The Sound Pattern of Englishand early generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 396 ff.
Kenstowicz, Michael J. & Charles W. Kisseberth
2022. Phonological derivation in early generative phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 419 ff.
Kingston, John
2022. Phonetic explanation in phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 593 ff.
Kiparsky, Paul
2022. Pāṇini. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 38 ff.
Kisseberth, Charles W.
2022. Representations in generative phonology in the 1970s and 1980s. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 440 ff.
Ladd, D. Robert
2022. Mid-century American phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 356 ff.
Lahiri, Aditi & Frans Plank
2022. Phonological phrasing. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 134 ff.
Moro, Elena Battaner & Richard Ogden
2022. John R. Firth and the London School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 242 ff.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2022. More than seventy years of probabilistic phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 639 ff.
Radwańska-Williams, Joanna
2022. The Kazan School. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 179 ff.
Ritter, Nancy A.
2022. Government Phonology in historical perspective. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 509 ff.
Salmons, Joseph
2022. Nineteenth-century historical linguists’ contributions to phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 163 ff.
Scheer, Tobias
2022. The interaction between phonology and morphosyntax in generative grammar. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 462 ff.
Sen, Ranjan
2022. The Greco-Roman tradition. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 109 ff.
Silverstein, Michael
2022. Boas—Sapir—Bloomfield. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 260 ff.
Sproat, Richard
2022. Writing systems. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 19 ff.
Staun, Jørgen
2022. Dependency Phonology. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 485 ff.
van Oostendorp, Marc
2022. Optimality Theory. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. 551 ff.
Scheer, Tobias & Philippe Ségéral
2020. Elastic s+C and Left-moving Yod in the Evolution from Latin to French. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Figures and Tables. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Oxford History of Phonology, ► pp. iv ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.