Cover not available
Part of
The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in honor of Jean Lowenstamm
Edited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi and Nicola Lampitelli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 12] 2014
► pp. 361–374

The interpretation of Construct-State morphology

| The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
The paper argues that both nouns and adjectives are interpreted as relational in the construct state. Accordingly, relational nouns can all be inflected in the construct state, and so can some sortal nouns which can be coerced to a relational interpretation. Similarly, relational adjectives can all be inflected in the construct state, and so can some predicative adjectives which can be reinterpreted as relational when in construct with a relational annex. The present approach accounts for the non-modifiability of such relational annex, and the restriction of its denotation to intra-individual relations. The latter restriction also accounts for the possible reinterpretation of a possessive affix on the annex of a nominal construct as the possessor of the construct as a whole.
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.12.28dor
References (39)
References
Berman, Ruth A. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel-Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Language Knowledge and Language Use: Binominal Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” General Linguistics 28: 261–285.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “On the Morphological Parallelism between Compounds and Constructs.” In Yearbook of Morphology 1, ed. by Geert Booij, and Jaap van Marle, 45–65. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1996. “The Construct in Review.” In Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm, and Ur Shlonsky, 30–61. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Deconstructing the Construct.” In Beyond Principles and Parameters, ed. by Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts, 43–98. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Compounds: The View from Hebrew.” In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. by Rochelle Lieber, and Pavol Štekauer, 491–511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coffin, Edna A., and Shmuel Bolozky. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danon, Gabi. 2001. “Syntactic Definiteness in the Grammar of Modern Hebrew.” Linguistics 39: 1071–1116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Definiteness Spreading in the Hebrew Construct State.” Lingua 118: 872–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “The Definiteness Feature at the Syntax-semantics Interface.” In Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics, ed. by Anna Kibort, and Greville G. Corbett, 143–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2000. “(In)definiteness Spread: From Romanian Genitives to Hebrew Construct State Nominals.” In Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, ed. by Virginia Motapanyaneh, 177–226. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2003. “From DPs to NPs: A Bare Phrase Structure Account of Genitives.” In From NP to DP, volume 2: The Expression of Possession in Noun Phrases, ed. by Martine Coene, and Yves D’hulst, 75–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit, and Irit Meir. 2010. “Definiteness in Standard and Colloquial Hebrew.” talk at BAALL, University Paris 7.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Construct State: Modern Hebrew.” In The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, vol. I, ed. by Geoffrey Khan, 581–589. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Amount Definites.” Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 42: 139–165.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Miriam. 1998. The Syntax of Nominalized Properties. Ph.D. dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
. 2000. “The Projection of Argument-taking Nominals.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 41–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faust, Noam. 2011. Forme et fonction dans la morphologie nominale de l’hébreu moderne. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris Diderot.Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hazout, Ilan. 1991. Verbal Nouns: Theta-theoretic Studies in Hebrew and Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Action Nominalization and the Lexicalist Hypothesis.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 355–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Adjectival Genitive Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” The Linguistic Review 17: 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, Daphna. 2002. “Possession as a Lexical Relation: Evidence from the Hebrew Construct State.” In Proceedings of WCCFL 21: Proceedings of the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Line Mikkelsen, and Christopher Potts, 127–140. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Kremers, Joost. 2005. “Adjectival Constructs in Arabic.” Linguistische Berichte 203: 331–348.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, and Edit Doron. 2013. “Degrammaticalization as Linguistic Change: The Case of the Definite Article in Modern Hebrew.” (in Hebrew). Leshonénu 75 (2–3): 317–358.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., and Vladimir Borschev. 2001. “Some Puzzles of Predicate Possession.” In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, ed. by Robert M. Harnish, and István Kenesei, 91–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Genitives, Relational Nouns, and Argument-modifier Ambiguity.” In Modifying Adjuncts (Interface Explorations 4), ed. by Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn, and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, 67–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit, and Yitzhak Shlesinger. 1995. “Factors in the Selection of Compound-type in Spoken and Written Hebrew.” Language Sciences 17: 147–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1988. “A Head Movement Approach to Construct-state Noun Phrases.” Linguistics 26: 909–929. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosén, Haiim. 1957. ivrit tova: iyunim betaxbir. Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2009. “Individuating and Measure Readings of Classifier Constructions: Evidence from Modern Hebrew.” Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 106–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Adjectivally Headed Construct States.” Lecture at the Tel-Aviv University Linguistics Colloquium .
Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. “The Form of Semitic Noun Phrases.” Lingua 114: 1465–1526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siloni, Tal. 2000. “Nonnominal Constructs.” In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar 2, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm, and Ur Shlonsky, 301–323. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Construct States at the PF Interface.” In Linguistic Variation Yearbook, vol. 1, ed. by Pierre Pica, and Johan Rooryck, 229–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Adjectival Constructs and Inalienable Constructions.” In Themes in Arabic and Hebrew Syntax, ed. by Jamal Ouhalla, and Ur Shlonsky, 161–187. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Prosodic Case Checking Domain: The Case of Constructs.” In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar 2, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, 481–510. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Carl, and Per Anker Jensen. 2002. “A Semantic Analysis of the English Genitive. Interaction of Lexical and Formal Semantics.” Studia Linguistica 56: 191–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar