Cover not available
Part of
Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque
Edited by Beatriz Fernández and Jon Ortiz de Urbina
[Language Faculty and Beyond 13] 2016
► pp. 67–92

Datives in Basque bivalent unergatives

| Deusto University
| UPV | EHU
Bivalent predicates which mark their sole object dative rather than absolutive/accusative are unexpected under the assumption that dative is associated with a ‘second complement’. Apparently first complements of morphologically transitive verbs are also found in Basque, in the main semantic classes already identified by Blume (1998). Morphologically, this sole object is indistinguishable from the indirect object of trivalent predicates of the give-type: both of them share dative case and trigger identical agreement marking on a ditransitive-like auxiliary form. In this chapter, we will focus on the syntactic behavior of these datives and, following McFadden (2004), we will show that similarities with indirect objects extends also to syntax, as attested in: (i) secondary predication, (ii) impersonal/passive clauses, (iii) adnominals, and (iv) causativization and relativization. These dative objects, then, differ from DOM dative complements in Basque (Fernández and Rezac, this volume) both in syntactic behavior and in distribution.
Keywords: adnominals, DOM, dative, impersonal clauses, indirect objects, secondary predicates, unergatives
Published online: 9 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.04ort
References
Aissen, Judith
2003 “Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21:435-483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albizu, Pablo
1998 “En torno a la inacusitividad sintáctica de las construcciones impersonales en euskera.” Interlingüística 8:13-18.Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos and Molina-Azaola, Gainko
2004 “Restructuring in Basque and the theory of agreement.” In Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 43-56. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Blake, Barry
2001 Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blume, Kerstin
1998 “A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative complements.” Linguistics 36.2: 253-280.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D.
1993.”On ergativity and ergative unergatives.” In Papers on Case and Agreement II [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19], Colin Phillips (ed.), 45-88. Cambridge, Mas.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1991 “Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond.” In New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, Douglas Kibbee and Dieter Wanner (eds.), 143-170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe.” In Actance et Valence dans les langues d’Europe, Jacques Feuillet (ed.), 193-258. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2012 “Differential Object Marking revisited.” Plenary talk, Syntax of the World’s Languages V, Dubrovnik, October 1-4.
Deustuko Hizkuntzalaritza Mintegia
1989 “Inkorporazioa perpaus kausatiboetan.” In Sintaxi teoria eta euskara, Pello Salaburu (ed.), 87-119. VII. Udako Ikastaroak. Donostia: UPVEHU.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo and Oyharçabal, Bernard
2008a “Dative structures in standard and north-eastern Basque.” Licensing conditions at the interface. International Encounter at the Summer Courses of the University of the Basque Country . XXVI. Donostia, June 23–24
Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés
1999 “Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), 1317-1397. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz & Milan Rezac
2010 “Datibo osagarri bitxiak eta Datiboaren Lekualdatzea: ari nai diyot eta kanta egin nazu bidegurutzean.” In Euskara eta euskarak: aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai, Beatriz Fernández, Pablo Albizu and Ricardo Etxepare (eds.), 113-149. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz and Rezac Milan
This volume. “Differential object marking in Basque varieties.”
Fernández, Beatriz
2008 “Quirky dative objects in Basque.” European Dialect Syntax Meeting III, Venice, September 18-21.
Fernández, Beatriz and Ortiz de Urbina, Jon
2012 “Dative (first) complements in Basque.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 11-1, 83-98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz, Ortiz de Urbina, Jon and Landa, Josu
2009 “Komunztadurarik gabeko datiboen gakoez.” In Beñat Oihartzabali gorazarre, Ricardo Etxepare, Ricardo Gómez and Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), 352-380. Bilbo: UPV/EHUGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz and Ortiz de Urbina, Jon
2010 Datiboa Hiztegian. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1985 “The case of German.” In Studies in German Grammar, Jindřich Toman (ed.), 65-101. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. and Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993 “On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations.” In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), 53-109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard
1977 “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 8.1, 63-99.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1993 “Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative.” In Papers on Case and Agreement I [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18], Jonathan D. Bobaljik and Colin Phillips (eds.), 149-172. Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1983 On the nature of ergativity. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
2001 “Le marquage différential de l'object.” In Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard Köning, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), 16-50. Delhi: Bahri Publications.Google Scholar
Maling Joan
2001 “Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles.” Lingua 111: 419-464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden Thomas
2004 The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
1999 “Construcciones con se: pasivas, medias e impersonales.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), 1631-1722. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Michelena, Luis
1977 “Notas sobre compuestos verbales vascos”. Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares XXXIII, 245-271.Google Scholar
Mounole, Celine
2012 “Evolution of the transitive verbs in Basque and apparition of datively marked patients.” In Ergativity, Valency and Voice, Gilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds.), 355-379. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2008 “Depictive secondary predicates in German and English.” In Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), 255-274. Oldenburg: Bis-Verlag.Google Scholar
Odria, Ane
2014 “Differential Object Marking and the nature of dative case in Basque varieties.” Linguistic Variation, 14-2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 289-317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In progress. Differential Object Marking in Basque syntax. A microcomparative survey. Ph.D. dissertation, UPV/EHU.
OEH
. Orotariko Euskal Hiztegia [General Basque Dictionary] 1987-2005 Luis Mitxelena and Ibon Sarasola. Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia, Desclée de Brower, Mensajero. [Available online at [URL]]Google Scholar
Ormazabal, Javier and Romero, Juan
1998 “On the syntactic nature of the Me-lui and the Person Case Constraint.” ASJU 32(2), 415-433.Google Scholar
2001 “A brief description of some agreement restrictions.” In Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean. On case and agreement, Beatriz Fernández and Pablo Albizu (eds.), 215-241. Bilbo: UPV/EHU Editorial Services.Google Scholar
2007 “Object agreement restrictions.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 315-347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “The derivation of dative alternations.” In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A cross-linguistic perspective, Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro & Nerea Madariaga (eds.), 202-232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a “Differential object marking, case and agreement.” Borealis . An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2): 221–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “Non accusative objects.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 155–173.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, Jon
1987 “Interferentzia sintaktiko berezi batez [On a special type of syntactic interference]”. 2nd World Basque Conference. San Sebastian, July 31, 1987.
2003a “Impersonal clauses.” In A Grammar of Basque, Jose Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 572-590. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b “Causatives.” In A Grammar of Basque, Jose Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 592-607. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oyharçabal, Bernard
1987 Etude descriptive de constructions complexes en basque: propositions relatives, temporelles, conditionnelles et concessives. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Paris VII.Google Scholar
2003 “Relative clauses.” In A grammar of Basque, Jose Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 762-823. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 “Basque Ditransitives.” In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro and Herea Madariaga (eds.), 233-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
1985 “Prädikativ und Koprädikativ.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 13:154-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2012 “The absence of an implicit object in unergatives: new and old evidence from Basque.” Lingua 122(3): 278–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf de
1972 Studies in Basque Syntax: Relative Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sáez, Luis
2009 “Applicative phrases hosting accusative clitics.” In Little Words: Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, and Acquisition, Ronald P. Leow, Hector Campos and Donna Lardiere (eds.), 61-75. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva and Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2004 “Depictive secondary predicates in cross-linguistic perspective.” Linguistic Typology 8:59-131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2004 “Icelandic non-nominative subjects: facts and implications.” In Non-nominative Subjects, vol. 2, Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds.), 137-159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Jane
2005 “Depictives in English and Warlpiri.” In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), 69-106. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther
2010 “Variability in the case patterns of causative formation in Romance and its implications.” Linguistic Inquiry, 41:3, 445-470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabala, Igone
1993 Predikazioaren teoriak gramatika sortzailean [Predication Theories in Generative Grammar], Ph.D. dissertation, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Berro, Ane & Beatriz Fernández
2019. Applicatives without verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:4 ► pp. 1273 ff. DOI logo
Berro, Ane, Ane Odria & Beatriz Fernández
2022. Person matters in impersonality. Syntax 25:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Beatriz & Ane Berro
2022. Basque impersonals in comparison. Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 1039 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Beatriz, Fernando Zúñiga & Ane Berro
2020. Datives with psych nouns and adjectives in Basque. Folia Linguistica 54:3 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Beatriz, Fernando Zúñiga & Ane Berro
2020. Datives with psych nouns and adjectives in Basque. Folia Linguistica 54:3 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Odria, Ane, Ane Berro & Beatriz Fernández
2022. Pertsona murriztapenak ditu egitura inpertsonalak: euskararen kasua. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :133 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.