Cover not available
Part of
Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque
Edited by Beatriz Fernández and Jon Ortiz de Urbina
[Language Faculty and Beyond 13] 2016
► pp. 139–192

Gaps and stopgaps in Basque finite verb agreement*

 | CNRS – IKER, UMR5478
This chapter surveys gaps in Basque finite verb agreement, their sources, and their theoretical consequences. First come interpretive gaps due to Condition B. In Basque they are grammaticalised, and reveal a useful distinction between agreement and clitic systems. Next are gaps due to conditions on syntactic dependencies, two taken up in detail. One is the impossibility of dative agreement across an absolutive, which does not rule out any forms but certain pairings of form and meaning. The second is the Person Case Constraint, a gap with repairs through otherwise unavailable syntactic structures and novel agreeing forms. Last and in most detail are taken up morphological gaps in many western dialects, where some or all 1st person plural + 2nd person combinations are missing. In their place are often found stopgaps, forms that fail to code features of the arguments involved, including forms surface-identical to impersonals. A concern throughout is the potential of gaps and responses to them in helping understand the boundaries and interactions of morphology, syntax and interpretation.
Keywords: agreement, gaps, morphology, repair strategies, syntax
Published online: 9 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.06rez
References (170)
10. References
Agirretxe, Joxe Luix, Lersundi, Mikel and Olaetxea Ortzuri. 1998. Pasaiako hizkera. Pasaia: Pasaiko Udala.Google Scholar
Albizu, Pablo. 1997a. The Syntax of Person Agreement. Ph.D. dissertation draft, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
. 1997b. “Generalized Person-Case Constraint: A case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology.” In Theoretical Issues on the Morphology-Syntax Interface, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria and Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), 1-33. Donostia: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Impersonal constructions of Basque revisited.” Handout from Mayfest ‘98 , July 6-8 1998, University of Maryland.
2001. “Sobre la distribución sintáctica de las formas finitas del verbo vasco.” ASJU 35: 65-106.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Basque verbal morphology: Redefining cases.” In Erramu Boneta, Xabier Artiagoitia, Patxi Goenaga, and Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), 1-19. Bilbao: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Micro-variación en las construcciones inacusativas de dativo posesivo del euskera.” Handout from Wedisyn 2, University of Barcelona, February 17-18, 2011.
Albright, Adam. 2006. “Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps.” Ms., MIT. On-line: [URL].
Anand, Pranav. 2007. De de se. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Aramaio, Itziar. 2001. Berriatuako aditz laguntzailea. BA Thesis, Deustuko Unibertsitatea, Bilbo.Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos. 2004. “The have/be alternation in Basque.” Ms., University of Illinois. On-line: [URL].
Arregi, Karlos and Nevins, Andrew. 2006. “Obliteration vs. impoverishment in the Basque g-/z- constraint.” In Penn Linguistics Colloquium 30: 1-14.Google Scholar
. 2011. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Arregui, Anna. 2007. “Being me, being you: pronoun puzzles in modal contexts.” Sinn und Bedeutung 11: 31-45.Google Scholar
Arteatx, Iñigo. 2007. “Euskarazko oharmen-aditzen osagarrietako perpaus jokatugabeak.” Uztaro 63: 31–63.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Perception verb complements in Basque.” In Noun Phrases and Nominalizations in Basque Urtzi Etxeberria, Ricardo Etxepare and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), 397-436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arretxe, Jon. 1994. Basauriko euskara. Basauri: Basauriko Udala.Google Scholar
Artiagoitia, Xabier. 2000. Hatsarreak eta parametroak lantzen. Vitoria-Gasteiz: UPV/EHU and Arabako Foru Aldundia.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Reciprocal and reflexive constructions.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 607-631. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariztimuño, Borja. 2013. “Finite verbal morphology.” In Basque and Proto-Basque, Mikel Martinez-Areta (ed.), 359-428. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Azkue, Resurrección María de. 1923-1925. Morfología vasca. Bilbo: Editorial Vasca.Google Scholar
Baauw, Sergio and Delfitto, Denis. 2005. “New views on reflexivity: Delay effects in Romance.” Probus 17: 145-184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville G. and Brown, Dunstan (eds.). 2010. Defective Paradigms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1992. “Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms.” Journal of Semantics 9: 69-93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béjar, Susana and Rezac, Milan. 2009. “Cyclic Agree.” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 35-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1975. Recherches en vue d’une théorie de la grammaire française: Essai d’application à la syntaxe des pronoms. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911. “Chinook.” In Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40: 559-677.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and Branigan, Phillip. 2006. “Eccentric agreement and multiple Case checking.” In Ergativity: Emerging Issues, Alana Johns, Diane Massam and Juvenal Ndayiragije (eds.), 47-77. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 1994. “The Person-Case constraint: A morphological approach.” MITWPL 22: 33-52.Google Scholar
Broadbent, Judith M. 2009. “The *amn’t gap: The view from West Yorkshire.” Journal of Linguistics 45: 251-284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. “Explaining morphosyntactic competition.” In Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), 1-44. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Danel. 2005. Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Brewer, Mary A. 1980. “Explanation in morphophonemics: changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms.” Lingua 52: 201-242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabodevilla, Josu. 1991. Aetzen Uskara. Iruñea: Nafarroako Gobernua.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna and Starke, Michael. 1999. “The typology of structural deficiency.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Problems of projection.” Lingua 130: 33-49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. “On si constructions and the theory of Arb .” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521-581.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael, and Fernández Landaluce, Javier. 2012. “On the (im)possibility of partial argument coreference.” Linguistics 50: 765-782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and Linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Phase extension: A reply.” Theoretical Linguistics 33: 133-63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel, Lipták, Anikó and Zvolenszky, Zsófia. 2001. “On inclusive reference anaphora: New perspectives from Hungarian.” WCCFL 20: 137-149.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2003. Basic Linguistic Theory 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Egaña, Aitzane. 1984. “Bermeoko aditzaren azterketa lorratzak.” Bermeo 4: 13-43.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2000. “Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect.” Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185-230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf. 2001. “Movement operations after syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry. 32-4. 555-595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), 289-324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Embick, David and Marantz, Alec. 2008. “Architecture and blocking.” Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1-53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1999. “How clitics license null phrases.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 291-367. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Epelde, Irantzu. 2003. Larresoroko Euskara. Ph.D. dissertation, UPV-EHU.Google Scholar
Etxabe, Karmele and Garmendia, Larraitz. 2003. Zaldibiako euskara: Bertako bizimodua, ohiturak, eta pasadizoak. Zaldibia: Zaldibiako Udala.Google Scholar
Etxebarria, Juan Manuel. 1998. Zeberio haraneko euskararen azterketa etno-linguistikoa. Bilbo: Deustuko Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 2003a. “Urruneko komunztadura eta menpeko infinitiboak euskaraz.” Lapurdum 8: 167-206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. “Valency and argument structure in the Basque verb.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 363-384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Number long distance agreement in (substandard) Basque.” In Studies in Basque and Historical Linguistics in Memory of R.L. Trask – R.L. Trasken oroitzapenetan ikerketak euskalaritzaz eta hizkuntzalaritza historikoaz [Supplements of ASJU 40], Joseba A. Lakarra and José Ignacio Hualde: 303-350. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2012. Agreement Configurations: Lessons from Distance. Habilitation thesis, IKER, CNRS.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo and Oyharçabal, Bernard. 2013. “Datives and adpositions in northeastern Basque.” In Variation in Datives: A Micro-comparative Perspective, Beatriz Fernández and Ricardo Etxepare (eds.), 50-95. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo and Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2012. “Denominal necessity modals in Basque.” In Noun Phrases and Nominalization in Basque, Urtzi Etxeberria, Ricardo Etxepare and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), 282-330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, Claudia. 1999. Verbal Complement Clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz. 2001. “Absolutibo komunztaduradun ergatiboak, absolutibo komunztaduradun datiboak: Ergatiboaren Lekualdatzetik Datiboaren Lekualdatzera.” In On Case and Agreement, Beatriz Fernández and Pablo Albizu (eds.), 147-165. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Goi- eta behe-datiboak eta datibo-komunztaduraren murriztapena.” In Euskal dialektologia: lehena eta oraina [Supplements of ASJU 69], Irantzu Epelde (ed.), 37-64, Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Beatriz and Albizu, Pablo. 2006. “Agreement doubling in Basque dialects.” Slides from Workshop on Syntactic Doubling , March 2006, Amsterdam.
Fernández, Beatriz, Ortiz de Urbina, Jon and Landa, Josu. 2009. “Datibo komunztaduraren gakoez.” In Beñat Oihartzabali gorazarre. Festschrift for Bernard Oyharçabal [Supplements of ASJU 43], Ricardo Etxepare, Ricardo Gómez and Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), 352-380. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz and Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 2010. Datiboa hiztegian. Bilbao: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean and Inoue, Atsu. 1994. “The diagnosis and cure of garden paths.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23: 407-434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Jon. 1993. On Object Agreement in Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaminde, Iñaki, Romero, Asier and Legarra, Hiart. 2012. Gramatika eta hizkuntz bariazioa Bermeon. Bermeo: Bermeoko Udala eta Campos Hegaluzea.Google Scholar
Gaminde, Iñaki. 1992. Foruko euskararen morfosintaxiaz. Forua: Foruko Udala.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia. 1971. “Unspeakable sentences: Book 2”. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 601-2.Google Scholar
Haas, Josef. 1909. Neufranzösische Syntax. Halle an der Saale.Google Scholar
Hamann, Cornelia. 2011. “Binding and coreference: Views from child language.” In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, Jill de Villiers and Tom Roeper (eds.), 247-290. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf. 1999. “Distributed Morphology.” Glot International 4.4: 3-9.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. “Explaining the ditransitive Person Case Constraint: A usage-based approach.” Constructions 2. [[URL]]Google Scholar
Heap, David. 2008. “Morphosyntactic theory needs Iberian linguistic geography (and vice versa).” Dialectologia 1: 45-64.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1991. “Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms.” In Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection, Frans Plank (ed.), 75-89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Pragmatic skewing in 1↔2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages.” International Journal of American Linguistics 64: 83-104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1998. “Anaphora and semantic interpretation: A reinterpretation of Reinhart’s approach.” MITWPL 25: 205-246.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Forks in the road to Rule I.” NELS 38: 339-358.Google Scholar
Heger, M. Klaus. 1966. “La conjugaison objective en français et en espagnol.” Persée 1: 19-38.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2002. “On the loss of ergative displacement in Basque and the role of analogy in the development of morphological paradigms.” In The Linguist’s Linguist: A Collection of Papers in Honour of Alexis Manaster Ramer, Fabrice Cavoto (ed.), 219-230. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Finite forms.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 205-245. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, Jose Ignacio, Elordieta, Gorka and Elordieta, Arantzazu. 1994. The Basque Dialect of Lequeitio. Bilbao: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2000. “I amn’t.” Language 76: 297–323.Google Scholar
Ibarra, Orreaga. 1995. Ultzamako hizkera. Inguruko euskalkiekiko harremanak. Iruñea: Nafarroako Gobernua.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Pronouns and their antecedents.” In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seely (eds.), 133-166. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafitte, Pierre. 1979 [1995]. Grammaire Basque (Navarro-Labourdin littéraire). Donostia: Elkar.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1993a. “The structure of inflection.” In Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 21-70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993b. “Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative.” MITWPL 18: 149-172.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Thetablind Case: Burzio’s Generalisation and its image in the mirror.” In Arguments and Case, Eric Reuland (ed.), 103-129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laka, Enara, Olondo, Leire and Gaminde, Iñaki. 2012. “Bermeoko gazteen euskararen aditz morfologiaz.” Euskalingua 13: 27-36.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981. Topic, Antitopic, and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrañaga, Jone. 1998. Antzuolako hizkera. Antzuola: Antzuolako Udala.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1981. “On two recent treatments of disjoint reference.” Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 48–58.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1998. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. “Construcciones con se: medias, pasivas e impersonales.” In Gramática de la lengua española, vol. 2, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), 1631-1722. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance.” Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 290-336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Philip H. and Sag, Ivan A. 1997. “French clitic movement without clitics or movement.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.573-639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Jerry L. 1972. “Verb agreement as a rule of English.” CLS 8: 278-86.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1978. “Interprétation des pronoms et des réfléchis en français.” In Cahier de linguistique 8: 337-76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. “Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual.” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 413-444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Haplological dissimilation at distinct stages of exponence.” In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 84-116. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
N’Diaye, Genevieve. 1970. Structure du dialect basque de Maya. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Odria, Ane. in prep. Differential Object Marking in Basque Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, UPV-EHU.
Ormazabal, Javier and Romero, Juan. 2013. “Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation.” Probus 25: 301-344.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1989. Parameters in the Grammar of Basque. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 2003a. “Causatives.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 592-607. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. “Impersonal clauses.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 572-591. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003c. “Periphrastic constructions.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 284-299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Old Basque (medio)passives.” ASJU 40: 763-786.Google Scholar
Oyharçabal, Beñat. 1993. “Verb agreement with non arguments: On allocutive agreement.” In Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 89-114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Lexical causatives and causative alternation in Basque.” In Inquiries into the Lexicon-Syntax Relations in Basque. [Supplements of ASJU 46], Beñat Oyharçabal (ed.) 223-253, Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Tokiz kanpoko numero komunztadura.” Iker 17: 395-408.Google Scholar
Oyharçabal, Beñat and Etxepare, Ricardo. 2012. “The absence of Person-Case Constraints in early Lapurdian.” In Second Conference of the Luis Michelena Chair, Joseba A. Lakarra, Joaquín Gorrochategui and Blanca Urgell (eds.), 149-170. Vitoria-Gasteiz: UPV-EHU.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Constraints in Syntax. New York: Rinehart and Winston Inc.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1983. “On characterizing French grammatical structure.” Linguistic Analysis 11: 361-417.Google Scholar
. 1984. “French indirect object cliticisation and SSC/BT.” Linguistic Analysis 14: 111-172.Google Scholar
. 1990. “French indirect object demotion.” In Studies in Relational Grammar 3, Paul M. Postal and Brian D. Joseph (eds.), 104-200. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer. 2009. “Breaking agreements.” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 619-666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The absence of an implicit object from unergatives: New and old evidence from Basque.” Lingua 122: 278-288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey. 2013. “The central question in comparative syntactic metatheory.” Mind and Language 28: 492-521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey and Zwicky, Arnold. 1999. “Gerund participles and head-complement inflection conditions.” In The Clause in English, Peter Collins and David Lee (eds.), 251-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rebuschi, George. 1983. Structure de l’énoncé en basque. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface Strategies. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya and Reuland, Eric. 1993. “Reflexivity.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2003. “The fine structure of cyclic Agree.” Syntax 6: 156-182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Agreement displacement in Basque.” Ms., UPV/EHU. On-line: [URL].
. 2008a. “Phi-Agree and theta-related Case.” In Phi theory: Phi-features across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger, and Susana Béjar (eds.), 83-129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008b. “The syntax of eccentric agreement: The Person Case Constraint and Absolutive Displacement in Basque.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 61-106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “On the unifiability of repairs of the Person Case Constraint: French, Basque, Georgian, and Chinook.” In Beñat Oihartzabali gorazarre. Festschrift for Bernard Oyharçabal [Supplements of ASJU 43], Ricardo Etxepare, Ricardo Gómez and Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), 769-790. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2010a. “Ineffability through modularity: Gaps in French clitic clusters.” In Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, and Dunstan Brown (eds.), 151-180. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “Review of Agreement Restrictions.” Language 86: 348-353.Google Scholar
. 2010c. “Phi-Agree vs. movement: Evidence from floating quantifiers.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 496-508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of Language. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Person restrictions in Basque intransitives.” Lapurdum 13: 305-322.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan and Fernández, Beatriz. 2013. “Dative displacement in Basque.” In Variation in Datives: A Micro-comparative Perspective, Beatriz Fernández and Ricardo Etxepare (eds.), 256-282. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan and Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2015. “The ways of referential deficiency: French impersonal on and its kin.” Ms., CNRS.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan, Albizu, Pablo and Etxepare, Ricardo. 2014. “The structural ergative of Basque and the theory of Case.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1273-1330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 1993. “Syntax vs. morphology: A chicken and egg problem.” BLS 19: 139-147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf P.G. de. 2008. Standard Basque. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rivas, Albert Mario. 1977. A Theory of Clitics. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, Floris. 2008. Anaphora Resolved. Ph.D. dissertation, ILLC.Google Scholar
Rollo, William. 1925. The Basque Dialect of Marquina. Amsterdam: H. J. Paris.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 2006. “Binding into pronouns.” Lingua 116: 1561-1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1972. “Doubl-ing.” Linguistic Inquiry 3: 61-86.Google Scholar
Rotaetxe, Karmele. 1978. Estudio estructural del euskera de Ondarroa. Durango: Leopoldo Zugaza.Google Scholar
Safir, Ken. 2004. The Syntax of Anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Syntax, binding, and patterns of anaphora.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 515-576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. “Nonredundancy: Towards a semantic reinterpretation of the Binding Theory.” Natural Language Semantics 13: 1-92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Hierarchy of features and ergativity.” In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. 1997. “Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses.” Linguistic Inquiry 2: 318-343.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1988. “The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 391-434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1981. Concreteness in generative phonology: Evidence from French. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L. 1981. “Basque verbal morphology.” Iker 1: 285-304.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles, Kyle Gorman, Preys, Jennifer and Browczyk, Margaret. 2012. “Productivity and paradigmatic gaps.” Handout from NELS 43, CUNY, October 19-21, 2012. On-line: [URL].
Yrizar, Pedro de. 1981. Contribución a la dialectología de la lengua vasca. Donostia: Gipuzkoako Kutxa.Google Scholar
. 1991. Morfología del verbo auxiliar gipuzcoano, vol. 2. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
. 1992a. Morfología del verbo auxiliar vizcaino, vol. 1. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
. 1992b. Morfología del verbo auxiliar alto navarro septentrional. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1982. “La construction se-moyen du français et son statut dans le triangle : moyen-passif-réfléchi.” Lingvisticae Investigationes 6: 345-401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Le médiopassif à SN préverbal en français : pour une approche multifactorielle.” Congrès mondial de linguistique française 2008: 2645–62.Google Scholar
Zuazo, Koldo. 1998. “Nafarroako euskal hizkerak.” In Nafarroako hizkerak, Iñaki Camino (ed.), 1-22. Bilbo: UEU.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Rezac, Milan
2024. The rise and fall of a person-case constraint in Breton. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 42:3 ► pp. 1233 ff. DOI logo
Berro, Ane, Ane Odria & Beatriz Fernández
2022. Person matters in impersonality. Syntax 25:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Haddican, Bill & Urtzi Etxeberria
2022. Embedded allocutivity in Basque. Syntax 25:4 ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Odria, Ane, Ane Berro & Beatriz Fernández
2022. Pertsona murriztapenak ditu egitura inpertsonalak: euskararen kasua. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :133 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.