Cover not available
Part of
Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque
Edited by Beatriz Fernández and Jon Ortiz de Urbina
[Language Faculty and Beyond 13] 2016
► pp. 195–218

Nominals in Basque and their existential interpretation

| CNRS – IKER, UMR5478
Assuming that Souletin, the Basque dialect from Zuberoa, is a previous stage compared to Standard Basque (cf. Michelena 1964, Camino 2015; cf. also Manterola 2012, 2015), this paper tries to explain how Basque historically moves from a situation where bare nouns are allowed (Souletin dialect) to a situation where bare nouns are not allowed in argument position (Standard Basque). The reason we move from system A to system B is argued to be due to a semantic weakening and loss of the null D: (i) in Souletin BNs are full DPs with an empty head occupied by a phonetically null D (with indefinite reference and unspecified for number); (ii) this null D loses its semantic features and since it is null it cannot be reanalyzed and gets lost; (iii) in Standard Basque, due to the fact that null D is no longer available, the definite article [-a] -a semantically flexible element, cf. Etxeberria 2005 et seq- takes its place, as is phonologically a weak element, i.e. a suffix, and so the closest phonological alternative to the null D.
Keywords: bare nouns, definite article, existential interpretation, number neutrality
Published online: 9 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.07etx
References (75)
References
Artiagoitia, Xabier. 1997. “DP predicates in Basque.” In University of Washington Working Papers on Linguistics 15, A. Taff (ed.), 161-198. Washington: University of Washington.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Determinatzaile Sintagmaren Hipotesia Euskal Gramatikan.” Uztaro 27: 33-61.Google Scholar
. 2002. “The functional structure of Basque noun phrases.” In Erramu Boneta: Festschrift for Rudolf P. G. de Rijk, Xabier Artiagoitia, Patxi Goenaga and Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), 73-90. Vitoria-Gasteiz: ASJU.Google Scholar
. 2006. Euskarazko izen sintagma: arkitektura eta egitura funtzionala. Ms., UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2012. “The DP hypothesis in the grammar of Basque.” In NPs and Nominalizations in Basque: Syntax and Semantics, Urtzi Etxeberria, Ricardo Etxepare and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), 21-78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarate, M. & P. Altuna. 2001. Euskal morfologiaren historia. Donostia: Elkar.Google Scholar
Azkue, R.M. 1905. Diccionario Vasco-Español-Francés. Bilbo.Google Scholar
Bechert, Johannes. 1993. “Definiteness and article systems.” Eurotyp Working Papers I/4.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. 1998. The distribution and interpretation of adjectives in French: a consequence of bare phrase structure. Probus 10, 139-183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces – why languages vary. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Camino, Iñaki. 2015. “Ekialdeko euskararen iragana.” In Euskal dialektologia: lehena eta oraina. [Supplements of ASJU 69], Irantzu Epelde (eds.), 87-153. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, UMass.Google Scholar
Casenave-Harigile, Junes. 2006. Xiberotar gramatika llaburra. Maule: Sü Azia.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998a. “Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’.” In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 53-103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998b. “Reference to kind across languages.” Natural Language Semantics 6: 339-405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contreras, Heles. 1986. “Spanish Bare NPs and the ECP.” In Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Ivonne Bordelois, Heles Contreras and Karen Zagona (eds.), 25-49. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyos, Battittu. 1999. Le parler basque souletin des Arbailles: Une approche de l'ergativité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia and Espinal, M.Teresa. 2014. “Bare nominals in Brazilian Portuguese: more on the DP/NP analysis.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 471-521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2004. “Number Marking and (In)definiteness in Kind Terms.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393-450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delfitto, Denis. and Schroten, Jan. 1991. “Bare plurals and the number affix in DP.” Probus 3: 155-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2012. “Number as a feature.” In Functional Heads, L. Brugé et al. (eds.), 304-324. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, J. 1997. Quantifiers and Selection. On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Eguren, Luis. 2006. “Non-canonical uses of the article in Basque.” In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, M.J. Hauser et al. (eds.). Berkeley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Predication markers in Basque.” In NPs and Nominalizations in Basque: Syntax and Semantics, Urtzi Etxeberria, Ricardo Etxepare and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), 243-266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1994. “The development of the definite article in French.” In Perspectives on grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 63-80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.Teresa and McNally, Louise. 2011. “Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan.” Journal of Linguistics 47(1): 87-128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Etxebarne, Jüje. 2006. Xiberotar gramatika. Maule: Sü Azia.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2005. Quantification and domain restriction in Basque. Ph.D. dissertation, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2008. “On quantification in Basque and on how some languages restrict their quantificational domain overtly.” In Quantification: A crosslinguistic perspective, Lisa Matthewson (ed.), 225-276. London: Emerald.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Making a definite be interpreted as an indefinite.” In Thematic Volume on Bare Nominals – Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, Roberta Pires and Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin (eds.), 29-52. Lisboa: Univ. of Lisboa.Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Quantification in Basque.” In Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 90], Edward Keenan and Denis Paperno (eds.), 83-164. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “The way the definite determiner affects quantifiers in Basque (and beyond).” In Noun Phrase and Nominalizations in Basque, Urtzi Etxeberria, Ricardo Etxepare and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), 79-110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Basque nominals: from a system with bare nouns to a system without.” In Weak Referentiality, Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn, and Joost Zwarts (eds.), 335-364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Linguistics Today Series. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. in prep. Nominal expressions in Basque. CNRS-IKER.
Etxeberria, Urtzi and Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2010. “Contextual Restriction and the Definite Determiner.” In Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity, Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic and Neftali Villanueva (eds.), 93-126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. “D-heads, domain restriction, and variation: from Greek and Basque to St’át’imcets Salish.” In The Structure of NP/DP in Slavic and beyond, Lilia Schürcks, Urtzi Etxeberria, and Anastasia Giannakidou (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Etxegorri, Philippe. 2013. Biarnoko Euskaldunak. Zingi-Zango Legazpiko Euskara Elkartea/Eusko Jaurlaritza.Google Scholar
Euskaltzaindia. 1993. Euskal Gramatika Laburra: Perpaus Bakuna, Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Fara, Delia Graff. 2001. “Descriptions as Predicates.” Philosophical Studies 102: 1-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goenaga, Patxi. 1980. Gramatika Bideetan. Donostia: Erein.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Izen Sintagmaren Egituraz.” In Memoriae L. Michelena Magistri Sacrum, Joseba A. Lakarra and Iñigo Ruiz (ed.), 847-865. Donostia: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. “How does a language acquire gender markers?” In Universals of Human Language, J.H. Greenberg et al. (eds.), 47-82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2001. “Articles.” In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), 831-841. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Irigoien, Alfonso. 1987. “Euskarako izen sintagma mugatzailerik gabekoez.” Euskera XXX: 129-139.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. 1990. L’article LE generique sur le mode massif. Geneve-Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred et al. 1995. “Genericity: an introduction.” In The generic book, Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), 1-124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2004.- “Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither?”. In Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics5; Selected Papers from CSSP 2003, Bonami, O. & P. Cabredo-Hofherr (eds.). Paris.Google Scholar
Lafon, René. 1954. “Le nombre dans la déclinaison basque.” Via Domitia 1: 111–121.Google Scholar
. 1970. “Structure de la déclinaison basque.” Actes du Xeme Congrès International del Linguistes. 279–301.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1993. “Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusative that assign accusative.” In Papers on case and agreement I, [MITWPL 18], Jonathan D. Bobaljik and Colin Phillips (eds.), 149-172. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael. 1961. “Del demostrativo al artículo.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 15: 23-44.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. “Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form.” Linguistic Inquiry 25.4: 609-665.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters, and problems.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Linguistic Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), 562-603. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manterola, Julen. 2006. “-a euskal artikulu definituaren gainean zenbait ohar.” In Studies in Basque and Historical Linguistics in Memory of R.L. Trask - R.L. Trasken oroitzapenetan ikerketak euskalaritzaz eta hizkuntzalaritza historikoaz, Joseba A. Lakarra and José Ignacio Hualde (eds.), 651-676. Donostia-Bilbo: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia-UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2008. “-a morfemaren erabilera (eza) ekialdeko euskaretan.” In Koldo Mitxeleran Katedraren II. Biltzarraren Aktak, Joseba A. Lakarra, Joaquín Gorrotxategi and Blanca Urgell (eds.). Bilbo: UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Synchronic ubiquity of the Basque article -a: A look from diachrony.” In NPs and Nominalizations in Basque: Syntax and Semantics, Urtzi Etxeberria, Ricardo Etxepare and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), 179-208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Euskararen morfologia historikorako: artikuluak eta erakusleak. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).Google Scholar
Michelena, Luis. 1964. Sobre el pasado de la lengua vasca. Donostia: Auñamendi.Google Scholar
Michelena, L. 1979. “Miscelanea Filológica Vasca IV”. Fontes Linguae Vasconum XI, 33. 377-406.Google Scholar
Michelena, Luis. 1987. Palabras y Textos. Bilbao: University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
De Mulder, Walter and Carlier, Anne (2006). “Du démonstratif à l'article défini : le cas de ce en français moderne.” Langue française 152: 96-1.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan and Schmitt, Christina. 2005. “Number and indefinites.” Lingua 115: 821-855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oyharçabal, Bernard. 1994. “Contribution de la comparaison typologique à une analyse des rapports ergativité-(in)transitivité en basque.” In La langue basque parmi les autres (influences et comparaison), Jean Baptiste Orpustan (ed.), 115-148. Saint-Etienne-de-Baigorry: Izpegi.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Sonia. 2003. Euskal artikuluaren sintaxiaz. Ms., UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Rullmann, Hotze and You, A. 2006. “General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in Mandarin Chinese.” In Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, Klaus von Heusinger and Ken Turner (eds.), 175-196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriette, Winter, Yoad, and Zwarts, Joost. 2007. “Bare nominals and reference capacities.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(1): 195-222 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trask, Larry. 2003. “The Noun Phrase: Nouns, Determiners, and Modifiers; Pronouns and Names’.” In A Grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 92-134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Txillardegi. 1977. “L’emploi de l’indéfini en souletin.” Fontes Linguae Vasconum 25: 29-54.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Andrea. 2008. Bare nouns and number in Dene Suline. Natural Language Semantics 16: 39-68 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabala, Igone. 1993. Predikazioaren teoriak gramatika sortzailean. Ph.D. dissertation, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Nominal predication: copulative sentences and secondary predication.” In A grammar of Basque, José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), 324-339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, Roberto. 1998. “A Theory of Kinds, Partitives and Of/Z Possessives.” In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder (eds.), 259-304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar