Chapter published in:
Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 117–132

Uniqueness in element signatures

| University of Essex
Representations of segments using elements or features face the challenge of whether cross-linguistic representations of the same sound should have the same representation. In line with a universal view of phonology, it is generally argued that the same phonetic output should have identical representations across systems. This paper discusses some cases where this position is challenged, particularly in cases involving language change and so-called crazy rules. It is argued that the phonological patterning of segments is what should be the crucial deciding factor in their representation, allowing different elemental combinations of the same sound from different languages to map onto identical patterns in the speech signal.
Keywords: elements, features, universal interpretation, sound patterns, acoustic signal, lenition, Bantu spirantization, palatalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Elemental representations and signatures
  • 3.Disparate phonological representations
  • 4.Diachrony as motivating contrasting representations
  • 5.Possible evidence for synchronic knowledge of diachronic processes
    • 5.1Bemba spirantization
    • 5.2Tswana sound alternations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c7
References
Bach, Emmon & R.T. Harms
1972 How do languages get crazy rules? In Robert Stockwell & Ronald Macaulay (eds.), Linguistic Change and Generative Theory, 1–21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Backley, Philip
2011 An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip & Kuniya Nasukawa
2009 Headship as melodic strength. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds.), Strength Relations in Phonology, 47–77. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batibo, Herman
2015 The classical laws and rules in Bantu languages: How plausible are they. In Nancy C. Kula & Maxwell Kadenge (eds.), Special issue of Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(3): 247–260.Google Scholar
Bellem, Alex
2007 Towards a comparative typology of emphatics. Across Semitic and into Arabic dialect phonology. PhD dissertation, SOAS.
Bostoen, Koen
2008 Bantu Spirantization: Morphologization, lexicalization and historical classification. Diachronica 25(3): 299–356.Google Scholar
Botma, Bert
2004 Phonological Aspects of Nasality. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Botma, Bert, Nancy C. Kula & Kuniya Nasukawa
2013 Features. In Nancy C. Kula, Bert Botma & Kuniya Nasukawa (eds.), Bloomsbury Companion to Phonology, 33–63. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cole, D.T
1955 An Introduction to Tswana Grammar. Gaborone: Longman.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz
1996 The parametric occurrence of elements in phonological systems. In Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds.), A Festschrift for Edmund Gussmann from His Friends and Colleagues, 75–98. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.Google Scholar
2014 Between Phonology and Phonetics: Polish Voicing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John
1990 Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7: 255–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey
1992 Segmental decomposition and the signal. In W.U. Dressler, M. Prinzhorn & J.R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1992: Proceedings of the 11th International Phonology Meeting, 96–106. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
1995 The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Huber, Daniel
2003 Velars and empty-headedness in Government Phonology. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 45–56.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M
1994 Cyclic phonology and morphology in ChiBemba. In Jennifer Cole & Charles Kisseberth (eds.), Perspectives in Phonology, 81–112. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D
2000 A users' guide to Government Phonology. Ms., University of Ulster.
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1990 Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7: 193–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kula, Nancy C
1999 On the representation of NC clusters in Bemba. In R. van Bezooijen & R. Kager (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999, 135–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 The Phonology/Morphology interface: Consonant mutations in Bemba. In Helen de Hoop & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999, 171–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 The Phonology of Verbal Derivation in Bemba. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
2012 On the representation of tone in Element Theory. In Cyran, et al., (eds.), Sound Structure and Sense, 353–367. Lublin: Wynadictwo.Google Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. & Lutz Marten
1998 Aspects of nasality in Bemba. SOAS Working Papers in Phonetics and Linguistics 8: 191–208.Google Scholar
Ngolo, Naledi
2014 The mental representation of Setswana deverbative nouns: A psycholinguistic analysis of Class 1 and 9 nominalisations. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
Labroussi, Catherine
1999 Vowel systems and spirantization in Southwest Tanzania. In J.M. Hombert & L.M. Hyman (eds.), Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, 335–377. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Mogapi, K
1984 Thutapuo ya Setswana. Gaborone: Longman.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya
1998 An integrated approach to nasality and voicing. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and Interpretation. Studies in Phonology, 205–225. Lublin: Folium.Google Scholar
2005 A Unified Approach to Nasality and Voicing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ploch, Stefan
1999 Nasals on My Mind: The Phonetic and the Cognitive approach to the Phonology of Nasality. Ph.D. dissertation, SOAS.Google Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C
1995 Spirantization and the 7-to-5 Vowel Merger in Bantu. In M. Dominicy & D. Demolin (eds.), Sound Change, 73–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
1996 Une théorie de l’interaction directe entre consonnes. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris 7.
1999 A theory of consonantal interaction. Folia Linguistica 32: 201–237.Google Scholar
2015 How diachronic is synchronic grammar? Crazy rules, regularity and naturalness. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Phonology, 313–336. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar