Chapter published in:Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 145–162
The relative salience of consonant nasality and true obstruent voicing
Arguments for a clear affinity between nasality and voicing can be found in the phonology literature (Nasukawa 1998, 2005a; Kula and Marten 1998; Ploch 1999, Botma 2004). In contrast to traditional feature theories, these arguments attempt to capture the nasality-voicing correlation by claiming that the two properties are different phonetic manifestations of a single unified nasal-voice feature |N|: this is interpreted as nasality when non-headed but as true obstruent voicing when headed. Under this approach, headedness contributes to melodic complexity and relative phonetic saliency: a truly-voiced expression (i.e. the realisation of headed |N|) is more complex than its nasal counterpart (i.e. the realisation of non-headed |N|) and also more salient. However, so far there has been no agreement on the precise definition of salience when applied to these two properties, the confusion arising from the use of different types of acoustic measurements. To address this issue, this chapter considers the relative salience of consonant nasality and true obstruent voicing with reference to the modulated-carrier model of speech.
- 1.Representing consonant nasality and true obstruent voicing using a single unified feature
- 2.The relative salience of nasality and true voicing according to the sonority scale
- 3.Relative salience in terms of the modulated carrier-signal of speech
- 4.Consonant nasality and true obstruent voicing
- 4.1Nasal consonants
- 4.2Truly voiced obstruents
- 4.3Modulations: Their comparison and combinatorial possibilities
Published online: 30 November 2017
Abramson, Arthur S. & Leigh Lisker
1970 Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences . Academia, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 569‒573.
1998 Tier geometry: An explanatory model of vowel structure. PhD dissertation, University College London, University of London.
Backley, Phillip & Kuniya Nasukawa
Backley, Phillip & Toyomi Takahashi
Denes, Peter B. & Elliot N. Pinson
2012 Lenition. Intensive Lecture Series, The Graduate School of Tohoku Gakuin University.
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey
Kaye, Jonathan D., Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
Kent, Ray D. & Charles Read
Kula, Nancy C
Kula, Nancy C. & Lutz Marten
1995 Melodic structure and no constraint-ranking in Japanese verbal inflexion. Paper presented at the Autumn Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University of Essex, UK.
Ohala, John J
1992 Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. CLS: Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable , 319–338.
Ohala, John J. & Haruko Kawasaki-Fukumori
Piggott, Glyne N
1999 Nasals on my mind: The phonetic and the cognitive approach to the phonology of nasality. PhD dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O
2005 Speech considered as modulated voice. Ms. Stockhlolms universitet.