Cover not available
Part of
Interfaces in Grammar
Edited by Jianhua Hu and Haihua Pan
[Language Faculty and Beyond 15] 2019
► pp. 207–244

Chapter 8
The syntax of either and disjunction

| City University of Hong Kong

It is argued that the scope indicator either is base-generated in place and its syntactic relation with disjunction is subject to a phase-theoretic locality constraint. Apparently unbalanced disjunction where either does not occur adjacent to disjunction is in fact syntactically balanced coordination, with parts of the second disjunct possibly deleted by independent processes such as gapping or extraposition. Some facts recalling locality constraints on movement are shown to be due to conditions on deletion independently of movement. Processing may explain some but not all facts.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntactic movement theory
    • 2.1Syntactic movement of the scope indicator either
    • 2.2Disjunction and locality
    • 2.3Some problems with movement theory
  • 3.The reduction theory
    • 3.1Apparently unbalanced disjunction as gapping
    • 3.2Some problems with the reduction theory
      • 3.2.1The finality restriction
      • 3.2.2Impossible disjuncts
      • 3.2.3Correlates of the dangling particles
      • 3.2.4Disjunction with non-finite complements
      • 3.2.5Deletion of subject
      • 3.2.6Silent subject
  • 4.The locality condition for the SI either
    • 4.1Deletion in verb phrase coordination and dangling remnants
    • 4.2Locality of the SI either
    • 4.3Explaining other facts
    • 4.3.1Split coordination
  • 4.3.2Negation
  • 4.3.3Embedded complements
  • 4.3.4Syntactic islands
  • 4.3.5Extraposition
  • 4.4A processing perspective
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.15.08law
References
Belletti, Adriana
1990 Generalized verb movement. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson, Lutz Martin and Masayuki Otsuka
2005 Right node raising, coordination and the dynamics of language processing. Lingua 2005, 503–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
1986 Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivations by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (eds.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1976 A transformational approach to syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Samuel Jay Keyser
1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of semantic relations. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view of building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Han, Chung Hye and Maribel Romero
2002 Ellipsis and movement in the syntax of whether/Q … or questions. In Masako Hirotani (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 32, 197–216. GLSA.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard
1976 Conjunction reduction, gapping and right-node-raising. Language 52, 535–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1971 Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 21–35.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle
1996 Gapping. Ms., University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle
1993 From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay and Postal, Paul
1976 Beginning English grammar. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1978 Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Stanley Peters
1969 Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. In D. A. Reibel and Sanford Shane (eds.), Modern studies in English: readings in transformational grammar, 113–142, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1985 On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 217–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.Google Scholar
May, Robert
1977 The grammar of quantification. Ph.D.diss., MIT.Google Scholar
1985 Logical form: its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan
1993 Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Ph.D.diss., University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Neijt, Anneke
1979 Gapping: A contribution to sentence grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982 Paths and categories. Ph.D.diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–425.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats and Barbara Partee
1982 Conjunction, type ambiguity and wide scope or. In D. Flickenger, M. Macken and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of the first West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 353–362. Linguistics department, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D.diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan
1976 Deletion and logical form. Ph.D.diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan, Gerald Gazdar, Thomas Wasow and Steven Weisler
1985 Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 117–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Bernard
1999 On the syntax of either … or . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 339–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Muffy
1984 Gapping and interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 523–530.Google Scholar
Stillings, Justine T.
1975 The formulation of gapping in English as evidence for variable types in syntactic transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1, 247–273.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert, Paul Schachter and Barbara Partee
1977 Major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1979 Anaphora in generative grammar. Ghent: Story-Scientia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Christopher
1997 Phrasal movement in LF: de re readings, VP-ellipsis and binding. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 27, 423–439. GSLA.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1977 Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–139.Google Scholar
Winter, Yoad
2000 On some scopal asymmetries of coordination. In Hans Bennis, Martin Evaeret, and Eric Reuland (eds.), Interface strategies, 387–405, Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar