Lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic sources of countability
An experimental exploration of the mass-count distinction
In this chapter, we suggest that the meanings of mass and count nouns result from the interaction of three components of language - lexical roots, syntax, and pragmatic inference. We begin by providing a brief history of early work on the mass-count distinction, and show how the experimental literature gradually converged on the idea that the mass-count distinction is rooted in quantification, rather than in the object/substance distinction. Next, we review experimental evidence suggesting that the mass-count distinction is asymmetric, such that although children and adults expect count nouns to denote individuals, they think that mass nouns can denote a wider range of phenomena including objects, substances, and actions (whether individuated or not). Based on these data, we propose a model in which count syntax takes unindividuated semantic representations as input, and specifies quantification over countable individuals, while mass syntax leaves the measuring dimension up to individual semantic representations, such that some nouns quantify according to mass/volume, while others are lexically specified for individuation and thus quantify according to number. Finally, we suggest that although syntax and lexical semantic representations help determine whether a noun denotes countable individuals, they do not specify which countable individuals they denote. Drawing on evidence from young children's surprising failures in countIng object pieces as whole objects, we propose that nouns themselves do not encode full conceptual criteria for individuation, but instead encode partial criteria that are filled out pragmatically, by contrasting alternative descriptions of objects and their parts.
Article outline
- 1.
Introduction
- 2.Lexical and syntactic sources of countability
- 2.1Early experimental studies of the mass-count distinction: Objects and substances
- 2.2Quantification over individuals and mass-count asymmetry: Evidence for lexical and syntactic sources of
individuation
- 2.3Conceptual and pragmatic sources of countability
- 3.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (122)
References
Ameel, E., Malt, B., & Storms, G.
(
2008)
Object
naming and later lexical development: From baby bottle to beer
bottle.
Journal of Memory and
Language, 58(2), 262–285.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, E.
(
1986)
The
algebra of events.
Linguistics and
Philosophy, 9(1), 5–16.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bale, A. C., & Barner, D.
(
2009)
The
interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore
the mass/count distinction.
Journal
of
Semantics,26(3), 217–252.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., & Bachrach, A.
(
2010)
Inference
and exact numerical representation in early language
development.
Cognitive
Psychology, 60, 40–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A.
(
2011)
Accessing
the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic
inference.
Cognition, 188, 87–96.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., Inagaki, S., & Li, P.
(
2009)
Language,
thought, and real
nouns.
Cognition, 111(3), 329–344.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., Li, P., & Snedeker, J.
(
2010)
Words
as windows to thought: The case of object
representation.
Current Directions in
Psychological
Science, 19(3), 195–200.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J.
(
2005)
Quantity
judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns
count.
Cognition, 97(1), 41–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J.
(
2006)
Children’s
early understanding of mass-count syntax: individuation, lexical
content, and the number asymmetry
hypothesis.
Language Learning and
Development, 2(3), 163–194.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., Wagner, L., & Snedeker, J.
(
2008)
Events
and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating
mass and count
nouns.
Cognition, 106(2), 805–832.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berko, J.
(
1958)
The
child’s learning of English
morphology
(Doctoral
dissertation). Radcliffe College.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bloom, P., & Kelemen, D.
(
1995)
Syntactic
cues in the acquisition of collective
nouns.
Cognition, 56, 1–30.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, P.
(
1996)
Intention,
history, and artifact
concepts.
Cognition, 60(1), 1–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, P.
(
1999)
The
Role of Semantics in Solving the Bootstrapping
Problem. In
R. Jackendoff,
P. Bloom, &
K. Wynn (Eds.),
Language,
logic, and concepts: Essays in memory of John
Macnamara (pp. 285–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, P.
(
1994)
Semantic
competence as an explanation for some transitions in language
development. In
Y. Levy (Ed.),
Other
children, other languages: Theoretical issues in language
development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, L.
(
1933)
Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Braine, M. D. S.
(
1992)
What
sort of structure is needed to “bootstrap” into
syntax? Cognition, 45, 77–100.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, N., Audet, J., & Barner, D.
(
2012)
Pragmatic
inference, not semantic competence, guides 3-year-olds’
interpretation of unknown number
words.
Developmental
Psychology, 49, 1066–1075.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, N., Pogue, A., & Barner, D.
(
2011)
Piecing
together numerical language: children’s use of default units in
early counting and
quantification.
Developmental
Science, 14(1), 44–57.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, R.
(
1957)
Linguistic
determinism and the part of
speech.
Journal of Abnormal and
Social
Psychology, 55, 1–5.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, R.
(
1973)
A
first language: The early
stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bunt, H. C.
(
1979)
Ensembles
and the formal semantic properties of mass
terms. In
Mass
terms: Some philosophical
problems (pp. 249–277). Netherlands: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bunt, H. C.
(
1985)
Mass
terms and model-theoretic
semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burge, T.
(
1972)
Truth
and mass terms.
Journal of
Philosophy, 69, 263–282.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carey, S.
(
2009)
The
Origin of
Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carey, S., & Bartlett, E.
(
1978)
Acquiring
a single new word.
Papers and Reports
on Child Language
Development, 15, 17–29.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, C. Y.
(
1973)
Response
to
Moravcsik. In
J. Hintikkia,
J. Moravcsik, &
P. Suppes (Eds.),
Approaches
to natural
language (pp. 286–288). Dordrecht: Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R.
(
1998)
Yi-wan
tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and
massifiers.
Tsing Hua Journal of
Chinese
Studies, 28(3), 385–412.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R.
(
1999)
Bare
and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of
NP.
Linguistic
inquiry, 30(4), 509–542.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chien, Y.-C., Lust, B., & Chiang, C.-P.
(
2003)
Chinese
children’s comprehension of count-classifiers and
mass-classifiers.
Journal of East
Asian
Linguistics, 12, 91–120.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G.
(
1998)
Plurality
of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In Events and
grammar (pp. 53–103). Netherlands: Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G.
(
2010)
Mass
nouns, vagueness and semantic
variation.
Synthese, 174(1), 99–149.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, E. V.
(
1987)
The
principle of contrast: A constraint on language
acquisition. In
B. MacWhinney (Ed.),
Mechanisms
of language
acquisition (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, E. V.
(
1990)
On
the pragmatics of contrast.
Journal
of Child
Language, 17, 417–431.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dewar, K. M., & Xu, F.
(
2007)
Do
9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to
kinds?.
Developmental
psychology, 43(5), 1227–1238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dewar, K. M., & Xu, F.
(
2010)
Induction,
overhypothesis, and the origin of abstract knowledge evidence from
9-month-old infants.
Psychological
Science, 21(12), 1871–1877.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickinson, D. K.
(
1988)
Learning
names for material: factors constraining and limiting hypotheses
about word meaning.
Cognitive
Development, 3, 15–35.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S.
(
1994)
Variability
in early communicative
development.
Monographs of the
Society for Research in Child
Development, 5, 242
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Féron, J., Gentaz, E., & Streri, A.
(
2006)
Evidence
of amodal representation of small numbers across visuo-tactile
modalities in 5-month-old
infants.
Cognitive
Development, 21(2), 81–92.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, J. A.
(
1981)
Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foppolo, F., Guasti, M. T., & Chierchia, G.
(
2011)
Scalar
implicatures in child language: Give children a
chance.
Language Learning and
Development, 8, 365–394.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gathercole, V. C.
(
1985)
More
and more and more about
more
.
Journal of
Experimental Child
Psychology, 40(1), 73–104.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gelman, S. A., & Taylor, M.
(
1984)
How
two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for
unfamiliar objects.
Child
Development, 55(4), 1535–1540.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D.
(
1982)
Why
nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural
partitioning. In
S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.),
Language
development: Language, thought, and
culture (Vol.
2, pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L.
(
2001)
Individuation,
relational relativity and early word
learning. In
M. Bowerman &
S. Levinson (Eds.),
Language
acquisition and conceptual
development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon, B. S.
(
1992)
Towards
a common semantics for English count and mass
nouns.
Linguistics and
Philosophy, 15(6), 597–639.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon, B. S.
(
1996)
Collectivity
and distributivity internal to English noun
phrases.
Language
Sciences, 18 (1-2), 443–468.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon, B., Kehayia, E., & Taler, V.
(
1999)
The
mass/count distinction: Evidence from on-line psycholinguistic
performance.
Brain and
Language, 68(1), 205–211.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, P.
(
1985)
Evaluating
the semantic categories hypothesis: The case of the count/mass
distinction.
Cognition, 20(3), 209–242.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, P.
(
1988)
Count/mass
category acquisition: Distributional distinctions in children’s
speech.
Journal of Child
Language, 15(1), 109–128.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, P.
(
1969)
Utterer’s
meaning and intensions.
The
Philosophical
Review, 68, 147–177.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, J.
(
1981)
Form,
function and the language acquisition
device. In
C. L. Baker, &
J. L. McCarthy (Eds.),
The
logical problem of language
acquisition (pp. 165–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grossman, M., Carvell, S. & Peltzer, L.
(
1994)
The
sum and substance of it: The appreciation of mass and count
quantifiers in Parkinson’s
disease.
Brain and
Language, 44, 351–384.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T.
(
2001)
At
the semantics/pragmatics interface in child
language. In
Proceedings
of SALT (Vol.
11, pp. 231–247).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hespos, S. J., Saylor, M. M., & Grossman, S. R.
(
2009)
Infants’
ability to parse continuous
actions.
Developmental
Psychology, 45(2), 575–585.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Higginbotham, J.
(
1994)
Mass
and count quantifiers.
Linguistics
and
Philosophy, 17(5), 447–480.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Imai, M., & Gentner, D.
(
1997)
A
cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and
linguistic
influence.
Cognition, 62(2), 169–200.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N.
(
1994)
Children’s
theories of word meaning: The role of shape similarity in early
acquisition.
Cognitive
Development, 9(1), 45–75.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Inagaki, S., & Barner, D.
(
2009)
Countability
in absence of count syntax: Evidence from Japanese quantity
judgments. In
M. Hirakawa,
S. Inagaki,
Y. Hirakawa,
H. Sirai,
S. Arita,
H. Morikawa,
M. Nakayama, &
J. Tsubakita (Eds.),
Studies
in Language Sciences (8): Papers from the Eighth Annual Conference
of the Japanese Society for Language
Sciences. Tokyo: Kurosio.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P. & Vigliocco, G.
(
2010)
Does
the grammatical count/mass distinction affect semantic
representations? Evidence from experiments in English and
Japanese.
Language and Cognitive
Processes, 25(2), 189–223.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A.
(
2009)
Newborn
infants perceive abstract
numbers.
Proceedings of the National
Academy of
Sciences, 106(25), 10382–10385.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O.
(
1924)
The
Philosophy of
Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, N., Baker, E., & Macnamara, J.
(
1974)
What’s
in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper
names.
Child
Development, 469–473.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kobayashi, T., Hiraki, K., Mugitani, R., & Hasegawa, T.
(
2004)
Baby
arithmetic: One object plus one
tone.
Cognition, 91, B23–B34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, M.
(
1989)
Nominal
reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event
semantics. In
J. van Benthem,
R. Bartsch, &
P. van Emde Boas (Eds.),
Semantics
and contextual
expression. Foris: Dordrecht.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, M.
(
1995)
Common
nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and
English. In
G. Carlson, &
F. Pelletier (Eds.),
The
generic
book (pp. 398–411). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S.
(
1988)
The
importance of shape in early lexical
learning.
Cognitive
Development, 3(3), 299–321.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landman, F.
(
1991)
Structures
for semantics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E.
(
1999)
Concepts
and cognitive
science. In
E. Margolis, &
S. Laurence (Eds.),
Concepts:
Core
readings (pp. 3–82). Cambridge: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, P., Barner, D. & Huang, B.
(
2008)
Classifiers
as count syntax: Individuation and measurement in the acquisition of
Mandarin Chinese.
Language, Learning,
and
Development, 4(4), 249–290.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, P., Ogura, T., Barner, D., Yang, S.-J., & Carey, S.
(
2009)
Does
the conceptual distinction between singular and plural sets depend
on language? Developmental
Psychology, 45, 1644–1653.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, P., Dunham, Y., & Carey, S.
(
2009)
Of
substance: The nature of language effects on entity
construal.
Cognitive
Psychology, 58(4), 487–524.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Link, G.
(
1983)
The
logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical
approach. In
R. Bauerle,
C. Schwarze, &
A. Stechow (Eds.),
Meaning,
use, and interpretation of
Language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Link, G.
(
1998)
Algebraic
Semantics in Language and Philosophy. Center for the Study
of Language and Information.
Stanford,
CA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lucy, J. A.
(
1992)
Language
diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity
hypothesis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macnamara, J.
(
1982)
Names
for things: A study of human
learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macnamara, J.
(
1986)
A
Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in
Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malt, B. C.
(
2010)
Naming
artifacts: Patterns and
processes. In
B. H. Ross (Ed.),
The
psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and
theory (Vol.
52, pp. 1–38). San Diego: Academic Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F.
(
1988)
Children’s
use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of
words.
Cognitive
Psychology, 20(2), 121–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markman, E.
(
1985)
Why
superordinate category terms can be mass
nouns.
Cognition, 19, 31–53.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Y.
(
1987)
Order
of acquisition in the lexicon: Implication from Japanese numeral
classifiers. In
K. E. Nelson &
A. van Kleeck (Eds.)
Children’s
language (Vol.
6, pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mazuka, R., & Friedman, R. S.
(
2000)
Linguistic
relativity in Japanese and English: Is language the primary
determinant in object
classification? Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 9(4), 353–377.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moltmann, F.
(
1997)
Parts
and wholes in
semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moltmann, F.
(
1998)
Part
structures, integrity, and the mass-count
distinction.
Synthese, 116, 75–111.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Bisiacchi, P., Spironelli, C., Marinelli, K. & Semenza, C.
(
2008)
Mass
and count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on
early components.
Neuroscience
Letters, 430(1), 48–53.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parsons, T.
(
1970)
An
analysis of mass and amount
terms.
Foundations of
Language, 6, 362–388.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelletier, F. J.
(
1979)
Mass
terms: Some philosophical problems [
Synthese
Language Library 6]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelletier, F. J.
(
2010)
A
philosophical introduction to mass
nouns. In
F. Pelletier (Ed.),
Kinds,
things, and stuff [
New Directions in
Cognitive
Science] (pp. 123–131). New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S.
(
1984)
Language
learnability and language
development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prasada, S.,
Ferenz, K., &
Haskell, T. (
2002)
Conceiving
of entities as objects and
stuff.
Cognition, 83, 141–165.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, W. V. O.
(
1960)
Word
and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, W. V. O.
(
1969)
Ontological
relativity and other
essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothstein, S.
(
2010)
Counting
and the mass/count
distinction.
Journal of
Semantics, 27(3), 343–397.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B.
(
1999)
Early
noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure, and syntax
correspond? Cognition, 73, 1–33.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlesinger, I. M.
(
1971)
Semantic
assimilation in the development of relational
categories. In
D. I. Slobin (Ed.),
The
ontogenesis of
grammar (pp. 63–101). San Diego, CA: Academic.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwarzschild, R.
(
1996)
On
the meaning of definite plural noun
phrases (Vol.
61). Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Senft, G.
(
2000)
Systems
of nominal classification [
Language,
Culture, and Cognition 4]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sharon, T., & Wynn, K.
(
1998)
Individuation
of actions from continuous
motion.
Psychological
Science, 9(5), 357–362.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shatz, M., Tare, M., Nguyen, S. P., & Young, T.
(
2010)
Acquiring
non-object terms: The case for time
words.
Journal of Cognition and
Development, 11(1), 16–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shipley, E., & Shepperson, B.
(
1990)
Countable
entities: Developmental
changes.
Cognition, 34, 109–136.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soja, N. N.
(
1992)
Inferences
about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and
syntax.
Cognitive
Development, 7(1), 29–45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S.
(
1991)
Ontological
categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object
terms and substance
terms.
Cognition, 38(2), 179–211.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sophian, C., & Kalihiwa, C.
(
1998)
Units
of counting: Developmental
changes.
Cognitive
Development, 13, 561–585.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Srinivasan, M.
(
2010)
Do
classifiers predict differences in cognitive processing? A study of
nominal classification in Mandarin
Chinese.
Language and
Cognition, 2(2). 177–190.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Srinivasan, M., Chestnut, E., Li, P., & Barner, D.
(
2013)
Sortal
concepts and pragmatic inference in children’s early quantification
of objects.
Cognitive
Psychology, 66(3), 302–326.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Starkey, P., Spelke, E. S., & Gelman, R.
(
1983)
Detection
of intermodal numerical correspondences by human
infants.
Science, 222(4620), 179–181.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stiller, A., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C.
(
2011)
Ad-hoc
scalar implicatures in adults and
children.
Proceedings
of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science
Society
.
Subrahmanyam, K., Landau, B., & Gelman, R.
(
1999)
Shape,
material, and syntax: Interacting forces in children’s learning in
novel words for objects and
substances.
Language and Cognitive
Processes, 14(3), 249–281.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tare, M., Shatz, M., & Gilbertson, L.
(
2008)
Maternal
uses of non-object terms in child-directed speech: Color, number and
time.
First
Language, 28(1), 87–100.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verkuyl, H.
(
1993)
A
theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and
atemporal structure [
Cambridge Studies in
Linguistics, 64]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Martin, R. C., & Garrett, M. F.
(
1999)
Is
“count” and “mass” information available when the noun is not? An
investigation of tip of the tongue states and
anomia.
Journal of Memory and
Language, 40(4), 534–558.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, L., & Carey, S.
(
2003)
Individuation
of objects and events: A developmental
study.
Cognition, 90(2), 163–191.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, K., Dobkins, K., & Barner, D.
(
2013)
Slow
mapping: Color word learning as a gradual inductive
process.
Cognition, 127(3), 307–317.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waxman, S. R. & Markow, D. B.
(
1995)
Words
as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12-to 13-month-old
infants.
Cognitive
psychology, 29(3), 257–302.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wisniewski, E. J., Imai, M. & Casey, L.
(
1996)
On
the equivalence of superordinate
concepts.
Cognition, 60, 269–298.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wynn, K.
(
1990)
Children’s
understanding of
counting.
Cognition, 36, 155–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wynn, K.
(
1992)
Children’s
acquisition of number words and the counting
system.
Cognitive
Psychology, 24, 220–251.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wynn, K.
(
1996)
Infants’
individuation and enumeration of physical
actions.
Psychological
Science, 7, 164–169.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Chiang, W. C.
(
2002)
Enumeration
of collective entities by 5-month-old
infants.
Cognition, 83(3), B55–B62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, F.
(
2007)
Sortal
concepts, object individuation, and
language.
Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 11, 400–406.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, F., & Carey, S.
(
1996)
Infants’
metaphysics: The case of numerical
identity.
Cognitive
Psychology, 30(2), 111–153.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamamoto, K. & Keil, F.
(
2000)
The
acquisition of Japanese numeral classifiers: Linkage between
grammatical forms and conceptual
categories.
Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 9(4), 379–409.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Huang, Aijun, Xiaomei Zhang & Stephen Crain
2024.
The interpretation of animate nouns in child and adult Mandarin: from the Universal Grinder to syntactic structure.
Linguistics 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.